Let Shurmur play
McCrary just isn't the answer. I say spend the next 2 weeks getting Shurmur ready for the future. IMMYAXL
Re: Let Shurmur play
No. Unless you're a crack baby.
DeefromAtlanta wrote: No. Unless you're a crack baby.
This explains so much to me... Thanks
The problem is they will still chalk up a "guaranteed" win against Kentucky (not likely, they looked decent last night against Auburn) and UT (not ****ing happening this year) even with a loss to USCe.
Trust me, in their delusion ridden minds they will find six wins on their remaining schedule to justify the reasoning they will make a bowl game.
I don't know about the 6 wins, but your first part is spot on. They have some even saying after last night they "always" thought UK and Mizzou were better shots at wins because they are at Vandy.
My favorite from VM was the "charity" for USCe since they just had the flooding.
Apparently since everyone felt sorry for South Carolina going through the natural disaster, the refs and Vandy were going to be more lenient towards USCe out of pity. And that's the reason they lost.
I guess LSU is just a bunch of heartless jerks then since they didn't feel like letting SC win last week.
I'd also like to know what alternate universe they live in where Vandy has ever had a homefield advantage. UK will definitely have their stadium at least 50% blue and Mizzou will bring 10-15K at least.
It's been mentioned several times in this thread but could someone list the outrageous academic requirements for the players?
It's a great question Coug. I have had the opportunity to work with a few ex Vandy players and I seriously question the notion that they have a really high academic bar for their players.
I honestly think Vandy wins this game, and I almost fainted while typing this. I've seen Missouri play twice this year, and they have both EASILY been the worst college football I've seen in years (Uconn and UGA). They are horrible, horrible, horrible. Missouri will not win another game all year.
