Just as there is no perfectly played or coached game, there is never a perfectly officiated game. Players make mistakes, coaches call the wrong play, and officials miss calls. If perfection is the standard, fans and coaches are going to live a disappointed life.
But, the real world is supervisors review every game, grade every official, and make employment decisions based on performance. Just as one great call doesn't make one a great official; one bad call doesn't make one a bad official. Redding, the supervisor of SEC officiating, will grade that crew on their collective body of work. He may break up the crew, he may fire some of the crew and he may not. At the end of the day he's the only one that's qualified to make those decisions.
There are plenty of unethical members of the media out there who will carelessy or even intentionally exploit every opportunity to damage the image of various SEC coaches, SEC schools and the SEC as a whole. That's why the SEC needs a near zero tolerance policy for AD personnel, coaches, players, etc. criticizing officials and fellow coaches in the media. Slive's suggested change to stiffen the penalties for doing so was an excellent move and that's why it was unanimously approved by the ADs and university presidents.
Quality officiating is very important in protecting the huge financial stakes every SEC school, president, AD and coach has riding on the quality and image of SEC sports. Arguments that it is necessary for any of those parties to make criticism noise in the media in order to achieve improvements in the quality of SEC officiating are ridiculously invalid.
Criticism by SEC coaches of officiating or other SEC coaches is what it is -- whiny childish behavior.