The Disease of Liberalism

Wasn’t sure where to put this but it’s hilarious. Not sure if the article referred to “they/them” as a “he” on purpose or not.

 
  • Like
Reactions: marcusluvsvols
Wasn’t sure where to put this but it’s hilarious. Not sure if the article referred to “they/them” as a “he” on purpose or not.


LOL And they wonder why women's BB can't be taken seriously.
 
LOL And they wonder why women's BB can't be taken seriously.

I saw a snippet of the incident. The person just ran off the court mid game holding a huge raccoon. Everyone was laughing and the announcers held back their laughter while trying to cover it up. You can hear the official at the scorers table talking about the fan being ejected for making fun of the situation. 😂
 
Hope you all got your vaccinations for the woke mind virus. It's the only way to prevent liberalism
 
Funny how everything the Republicans do its always a "threat to our democracy".
These moron idiots have used that line now so much it means nothing at all.
Same old lie these scumbag dems like to use to try and scare people as usual.
 
Funny how everything the Republicans do its always a "threat to our democracy".
These moron idiots have used that line now so much it means nothing at all.
Same old lie these scumbag dems like to use to try and scare people as usual.

Crockett about to lose her seat..bye beech.
 
  • Like
Reactions: UT_Dutchman



grok:
Jim Acosta, a former CNN journalist, conducted an interview with an AI-generated avatar of Joaquin Oliver, a 17-year-old victim of the 2018 Parkland school shooting, on what would have been Oliver’s 25th birthday, August 4, 2025. The interview, aired on Acosta’s Substack, was facilitated by Oliver’s parents, Manuel and Patricia, who created the AI using their son’s writings and posts to advocate for gun control through their organization, Change the Ref.

The AI avatar discussed gun violence solutions, suggesting stronger gun control laws, mental health support, and community engagement, and also touched on lighter topics like basketball and movies such as Star Wars and Remember the Titans.Manuel Oliver emphasized that the AI was not an attempt to “bring back” his son but a way to hear his voice again and amplify his message on gun safety. He noted the AI was trained on Joaquin’s own words, making it “very legit,” and expressed plans to continue using it for advocacy, including posting videos to build a following. This was not the first use of Joaquin’s AI likeness; in 2024, it was used in a robocalling campaign called The Shotline to urge lawmakers to act on gun reform.

The interview sparked significant controversy. Critics on social media platforms like X and Bluesky called it “creepy,” “unsettling,” “exploitative,” and “grotesque,” arguing it was unethical to use an AI recreation of a deceased person for journalistic purposes. Some, like Reason reporter Billy Binion, criticized it as “chasing clicks” by animating a child to speak words he never said, while others questioned the journalistic ethics of platforming an AI over living survivors.

Supporters, however, viewed it as a touching experiment and an expression of the Oliver family’s love for their son, with Acosta himself describing it as a “beautiful thing.”The backlash led Acosta to disable comments on X, though criticism persisted on other platforms. The debate raised ethical questions about using AI to recreate deceased individuals for advocacy or public discourse, balancing the parents’ intentions with concerns about authenticity and exploitation.
 

"You mentioned Mamdani and you are in New York sort of speaking on behalf of him to a certain extent," Faber said on CNBC's "Squawk on the Street." "New York does not operate in a vacuum. It competes with other cities. And so this idea of somehow raising taxes on the wealthiest New Yorkers, who, by the way, would point out pay roughly 15 percent of their income right now between city and state. Raising taxes on them will simply drive them away."

"Shouldn’t the focus of a mayor be on delivering services to the constituents of the city and doing that by raising the most revenue as possible without chasing businesses and the high-income taxpayers out of the city?" he asked. "Because they can go to Austin. They can go to Dallas. They can go to Atlanta. They can go to Nashville. This is your issue. It’s a national issue, not a local issue."


"These are national issues," Faber said. "But if you deal with them in that way, by what is always your backup, just tax them more. They will leave."

"I think many people would disagree to the extent that by raising taxes and making it more onerous for businesses that create the jobs, that create the revenues on which taxes are – tax revenues come from, that you’d ultimately be dealing with a smaller pie. He may succeed by driving everybody out. Rents will go down," Faber said as Warren kept her argument focused on billionaires.

"If you think that the best way to run city government or national government is to start with the billionaires and say, what will work best for you? Vote Republican," she said. "


Get 'em Tits On A Bull.
 
  • Like
Reactions: marcusluvsvols



grok:
Jim Acosta, a former CNN journalist, conducted an interview with an AI-generated avatar of Joaquin Oliver, a 17-year-old victim of the 2018 Parkland school shooting, on what would have been Oliver’s 25th birthday, August 4, 2025. The interview, aired on Acosta’s Substack, was facilitated by Oliver’s parents, Manuel and Patricia, who created the AI using their son’s writings and posts to advocate for gun control through their organization, Change the Ref.

The AI avatar discussed gun violence solutions, suggesting stronger gun control laws, mental health support, and community engagement, and also touched on lighter topics like basketball and movies such as Star Wars and Remember the Titans.Manuel Oliver emphasized that the AI was not an attempt to “bring back” his son but a way to hear his voice again and amplify his message on gun safety. He noted the AI was trained on Joaquin’s own words, making it “very legit,” and expressed plans to continue using it for advocacy, including posting videos to build a following. This was not the first use of Joaquin’s AI likeness; in 2024, it was used in a robocalling campaign called The Shotline to urge lawmakers to act on gun reform.

The interview sparked significant controversy. Critics on social media platforms like X and Bluesky called it “creepy,” “unsettling,” “exploitative,” and “grotesque,” arguing it was unethical to use an AI recreation of a deceased person for journalistic purposes. Some, like Reason reporter Billy Binion, criticized it as “chasing clicks” by animating a child to speak words he never said, while others questioned the journalistic ethics of platforming an AI over living survivors.

Supporters, however, viewed it as a touching experiment and an expression of the Oliver family’s love for their son, with Acosta himself describing it as a “beautiful thing.”The backlash led Acosta to disable comments on X, though criticism persisted on other platforms. The debate raised ethical questions about using AI to recreate deceased individuals for advocacy or public discourse, balancing the parents’ intentions with concerns about authenticity and exploitation.

Despicable
 
  • Like
Reactions: BreatheUT
Funny how everything the Republicans do its always a "threat to our democracy".
These moron idiots have used that line now so much it means nothing at all.
Same old lie these scumbag dems like to use to try and scare people as usual.

The fan favorite Texas governor just signed an order Banning DEI. How will he get up steps? He is a DEI example. Magas = dumas
 
Advertisement

Back
Top