Orange_Crush
Resident windbag genius
- Joined
- Dec 1, 2004
- Messages
- 43,105
- Likes
- 88,889
I'll let you and OC finish the tete-a-tete....
but reread the passage....I think his "joking" relates to the VOLS were the sexy favorite last year, failed to perform, and when they do repeat again this year, will still remain the sexy favorite the next year.
He is being flippant for his gator brethren....and you're falling for it. :no:
Bingo. He stated incorrectly that the Vols were picked to win the SECE, then used that untrue statement to launch into a joke about us failing to meet expectations again and still being hyped next year.
That was the springboard for his entire pick against UT. Always hyped, never lives up to the hype, so discard this year's hype. The problem is that the Vols have not been hyped to win the east in a long time.
He digs the homer-hole deeper with the disparity in how he picks UF, compared to how he doesn't pick UT. He picks UF based on many unproven question marks as likely improvements, (i.e. transfer QBs, an inexperienced secondary, unproven/talented youth...). Then he states that UT is "on paper" a better team, while refusing to pick them because he doesn't believe until he sees.
He lists all the reasons that UT is a better team, admits that UT is a measurably better team, then discounts that for the very reasons that he used to pick UF. It's blatant and it's laughable. (Not to mention how he threw in the "streak" voodoo for good measure.)
So... UF will win the east based on unproven potentials? UT will not because they are better, but you won't give them credit for being better until they actually win it?
It's a total homer move to predict while refusing to predict favorably until it's not a prediction anymore.
So, what was he wrong about? He was wrong about the very definition and essence of predictions, within a prediction article.