05_never_again
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Aug 28, 2006
- Messages
- 26,090
- Likes
- 24,386
I would still put his legacy in the "mixed" or "it's complicated" category, particularly because we seem to be avoiding harsh penalties for Pruitt, but it certainly can be argued that he completely tarnished it.Also, Fulmer ruined his legacy. Never want to see that dude at a school sponsored function or event again
I would still put his legacy in the "mixed" or "it's complicated" category, particularly because we seem to be avoiding harsh penalties for Pruitt, but it certainly can be argued that he completely tarnished it.
Phil was one of the best I've ever seen at describing something that was the best for him as the best for the University. I suppose there could be some overlap, but definitely not always. He was great at intentionally conflating those two things.He did. He involved himself and weasels himself into that job, tanked multiple hires that would have been better than Pruitt and almost got us in the tank with the ncaa. His ego was so massive he couldn’t let go.
“What’s good for the goose is good for the gander” - philPhil was one of the best I've ever seen at describing something that was the best for him as the best for the University. I suppose there could be some overlap, but definitely not always. He was great at intentionally conflating those two things.