The 1/6 Hearings

#57
#57
Are you saying they weren't actually there and/or are lying

Their story/testimony has no relevance to the stated purpose of the hearing unless they are asked pointed questions on why they did and who told them to do.
 
#58
#58
It is a known fact that Trump die-hards stormed the capitol because they were pissed. The what has already been confirmed. Why weren’t capitol police prepared to deal with Trump’s redneck Randy posse?

Probably, and I'm going out on a limb here - no president has ever suggested to an angry mob that they march down the street and flick boogers at the US Capitol. Also, this isn't 1812.
 
#65
#65
So now a police officer, who was there, describing in detail all the bs they went through on that day doesn't count as evidence?

Not if it's irrelevant to the purpose of the hearing.

But we all know the real purpose of the hearing and why the officers are testifying, pure theater.
 
#75
#75
Why? Do you think they're lying?
Why don't we get a few dozen police officers from Minneapolis, Baltimore, Seattle, Portland, Chicago and Detroit to tell their stories? Let's also let the republican members pick which one testifies and also have a republican speech writer write their opening statements, sound good to you?
 

VN Store



Back
Top