Tennessee vs The Maxims vs Ohio

#1

OneManGang

Senior Member
Joined
Sep 7, 2004
Messages
2,045
Likes
9,730
#1
Tennessee vs The Maxims vs Ohio

Our beloved Tennessee Volunteers have an identity problem. Are they the team that fumbled and bumbled their way to victory against Appy State and Ohio or are they the focused aggressive team that blew VaTech out of Bristol Motor Speedway?

Having seen now near fifty years of Tennessee football in the confines of Neyland Stadium, you Humble Scribe has seen this movie before. During the waning years of Johnny Majors and through most of the reign of Sir Philip of Winchester, the Vols tended to play at exactly the level of their opponent for the day. Against an Alabama or Florida they might look ready to fleet up to the NFL. The next Saturday, against a Vanderbilt or Tiger High fans would scratch their collective noggins and wonder aloud if the Vols had ever played a down together.

So it is with Team 120.

There was a warning issued in this very space last week: “Next up are the Ohio Bobcats. I caution Vol fans to remember that the last time the 'Cats hove onto the shores of Lake Loudon, they tied Tennessee in knots for most of the game and the Vols were lucky to escape with the 'W'.”

History does tend to repeat.

******

The British were up against a wall. They had sent a commission to the United States in the early days of 1940 to buy stuff. The “stuff” they were buying were the weapons needed to fight Nazi Germany.

One of the things they knew they would need were fighters. The Brits were already building Hawker Hurricanes and Supermarine Spitfires as fast as they could but it was obvious more would be needed. The American P-40 was the most advanced fighter in the arsenal and the British were negotiating to buy as many as they could from the Curtiss company. Several of the members had met James “Dutch” Kindleberger of North American Aviation (NAA) during a visit he made to England before the war.

NAA was already supplying T-6 trainers to the RAF and the Fleet Air Arm and it was decided that since Curtiss would be hard-pressed to supply P-40s to both the US Army Air Corps and to the RAF, they would approach Kindleberger about building P-40s as well.

Kindleberger had come back from Britain convinced war was coming and that NAA needed to be prepared. He drew together a design team led by Edgar Schmued to begin concept work on a new fighter design. By the time the British showed up on his doorstep, the concepts were well along. Kindleberger offered a counter-proposal. What if he could build a fighter that would out-perform the P-40 and build it instead.

In May of 1940, as the Battle of France was nearing its disastrous end, the British agreed but with a crushing proviso. They would buy 320 of the new planes IF NAA could roll out a prototype and begin testing within 120 days. Also, the new plane would use the Allison V-1710 engine already in use on the P-40. Kindleberger took a deep breath and shook on it.

To the astonishment of all, 117 days after that handshake, a sleek, gleaming new plane rolled out of the NAA doors. Unfortunately, Allison could not supply an engine for nearly another month. The British deemed the conditions met, though.

On 26 October 1940, the North American NA-73X took to the skies and soon proved to be everything Kindleberger had promised being some 30mph faster than the P-40 and much more maneuverable. The major problem was that since all this took place before the US entered the war, the engine was a civilian version and lacked any kind of turbo-charging which meant performance above about 10,000 feet fell off dramatically. The same problem bedeviled early P-38 Lightnings sold to the British at about the same time.

The Brits were happy and with war production gearing up, the US Army took an interest in the new design. The Army decided that the fighter version didn't offer enough of an improvement over the P-40 and so modified it to be an attack plane with bomb racks and sights and dive brakes. They designated it the A-36.

The A-36 and its British cousins went on to establish a solid, if unspectacular war record.

All that changed in October of 1942 when the RAF sent five of the planes to Rolls-Royce to be fitted with the outstanding Merlin engine used in the Spitfire. It was a marriage that created a legend.

Performance jumped from a pedestrian 350 mph or so at 15,000 ft to a sizzling 440 mph at 27,000 feet. The US Army Air Corps was casting about for something to match the German Bf-109s and FW-190s and immediately worked out a deal for Packard to undertake mass-production of the Merlin engine which was then mated to a NA-73 airframe and designated it …

… the P-51B Mustang.

All the P-51s (and the later D models) did was to demolish the Luftwaffe beginning in February 1944 and continuing to the point that Ike was able to tell his boys going into Normandy, “If you see planes overhead, they will be ours.”

And now you know.

****

So, the question before us and the Vols of Team 120 is this: Will they continue to be the pedestrian somewhat underperforming group we saw against the Bobcats or will they finally throw off the past and emerge as the thoroughbreds they are capable of becoming?

We will know more ere our next gathering.

So how did the team do compared to the Maxims?

1. The team that makes the fewest mistakes will win.

The Vols managed to fumble the ball a whopping FIVE times but also managed to fal on them all. Allowing Ohio to claw its way back into the game after Tennessee's first possession was nearly a mistake of epic proportions.

2. Play for and make the breaks. When one comes your way … SCORE!

The Vols created virtually no breaks Saturday. Much of this can be directly traced to the inability of the Vol defense to create any kind of pass rush with their base four down linemen. (grumbles)

3. If at first the game – or the breaks – go against you, don’t let up … PUT ON MORE STEAM!

The Vols seemed to sleepwalk through most of Saturday's tilt. They reminded me of a guy who answers an early-morning phone call, deals with whatever issue and then promptly goes back to sleep. This attitude versus an SEC opponent will be fatal.

4. Protect our kickers, our quarterback, our lead and our ballgame.

On the other side, Ohio seemed to have little difficulty generating pressure against Tennessee's “deep and talented” offensive line. Draw your own conclusions.

5. Ball! Oskie! Cover, block, cut and slice, pursue and gang tackle … THIS IS THE WINNING EDGE.

This Maxim speaks DIRECTLY to intensity. This was an attribute sorely lacking in the Vols' effort. Indeed it can be argued that except for three quarters versus VaTech it has been lacking all season.

6. Press the kicking game. Here is where the breaks are made.

This was area where the Vols performed well. However, the injury to Cam Sutton cast a pall on the remainder of the game. Medley driving his kickoffs into the end zone was a definite plus.

7. Carry the fight to Ohio and keep it there for sixty minutes.
More like about ten minutes in fits and starts over the course of sixty minutes of game time. Not enough for an SEC for. Not by a long stretch.

[FONT=Times New Roman, serif]On the plus side, Tennessee is 3-0 for the first time in TWELVE YEARS. [/FONT]

Good Lord.

Brick by Brick, Baby!

MAXOMG


Suggested Reading:

Enzo Angelucci and Peter Bowers, The American Fighter

Roger A. Freeman, The Mighty Eighth

Michael O'Leary, USAAF Fighters of World War II

© 2016
Keeping Your Stories Alive

Three restored P-51 Mustangs in flight. The nearest is a P-51B model the other two are P-51Ds.
 

Attachments

  • P-51mixedCandDflight.jpg
    P-51mixedCandDflight.jpg
    83.8 KB · Views: 6
  • Like
Reactions: 20 people
#2
#2
Great analogy. "Pedistrian" is somewhat polite for what a lot of people had to say about the first Mustangs. But when mated with the Merlin it just clicked. It became perfection. To many it became the greatest pure fighter aircraft of all time as described by many people that flew several types of both prop and pure jet variety.

We too need that switch to get thrown and "click"

Edit: Mustangs have an Achilles heel. The oil cooler. That scoop thingie on the belly. Due to their poor altitude performance due to a lack of super charging they got relegated largely to ground support. And this totally exposed their weakness. You could literally bring a Mustang down with a single 8mm Mauser round into the oil cooler. And this happened a lot (small arms fire bringing down Mustangs not necessarily a single 8mm round)

The laminar flow wing was a clean design that needed power to emphasize its benefit for low drag.

The oil cooler exaggerated a role it was forced to play due to the initial hand it was dealt

But once the Merlin was hung on the nose... An absolute vengeful beast was unleashed. And then adjustments were made in its application (from ground support to ultimately long range bomber escort all the way to Berlin) and a legend began to write its legacy in the history books.

Really hope your analogy holds true OMG. We will see this weekend.

Go Vols!
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: 2 people
#7
#7
Love to read your insights each and every time. Agree we often play down or up to our competition. I have no idea what to expect next week when " Dem Gay-t*rds" visit.
I guess that's nothing new, and why we watch, and are fans of our beloved VOLS.
Thanks OMG!

"Coach'em up Jones!
 
  • Like
Reactions: 2 people
#8
#8
Ah, P51 Mustang.

Greatest plane ever made. Period.

Even the sound of the engine as it flies overhead is awe (or fear) inducing.

AV
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
#14
#14
In my mind, which are we...Brewster Buffalo or Grumman Wildcat? Thanks, OMG.

"Brewster Buffaloes" would be 0-3, not 3-0.

The Gruman Wildcat was slower, less maneuverable, and had shorter range than the Mitsubishi AM6 Zero. However, the Wildcat could take punishment, and US Navy aviator tactics gave Wildcat pilots a 6.9/1 kill/loss ratio throughout the plane's war service. The Wildcat was not the best fighter in the Allies' arsenal, however, it was produced and flown in combat from 1940 through to the end of the war (It could take off from and land on the smaller escort carriers).

So, if you are comparing the Gruman F4F to Team 120, then the 2016 Vols aren't the best team in the P5, but, via toughness and tactics, they're 3-0. If you're going to carry this analogy any further, please, refer to the plane as the Gruman F4F. I cannot stomach inference of Vols to Wildcats. It's just not done. :hi:
 
  • Like
Reactions: 2 people
#15
#15
"Brewster Buffaloes" would be 0-3, not 3-0.

The Gruman Wildcat was slower, less maneuverable, and had shorter range than the Mitsubishi AM6 Zero. However, the Wildcat could take punishment, and US Navy aviator tactics gave Wildcat pilots a 6.9/1 kill/loss ratio throughout the plane's war service. The Wildcat was not the best fighter in the Allies' arsenal, however, it was produced and flown in combat from 1940 through to the end of the war (It could take off from and land on the smaller escort carriers).

So, if you are comparing the Gruman F4F to Team 120, then the 2016 Vols aren't the best team in the P5, but, via toughness and tactics, they're 3-0. If you're going to carry this analogy any further, please, refer to the plane as the Gruman F4F. I cannot stomach inference of Vols to Wildcats. It's just not done. :hi:

Thanks for being pedantic. I'd like to see the gloves come off on the field, too.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
Advertisement



Back
Top