Targeting call

#2
#2
They just need to be more consistent with it. Many that I have seen called today should have and that stuff needs to be taken out of the game.
 
#11
#11
True, but gosh, I wish they would leave a little room in their for judgement based on intent.
Intent doesn't matter. You lead with the head above the shoulders and it's going to get flagged.

I think they should make exceptions for a ball carrier lowering his head since he's not really defenseless, but until they do....
 
#13
#13
Intent doesn't matter. You lead with the head above the shoulders and it's going to get flagged.

I think they should make exceptions for a ball carrier lowering his head since he's not really defenseless, but until they do....
That is exactly why I specifically said I wish judgement was allowed for intent.
 
#20
#20
They need to change the whole in game suspended the Next game. That’s just dumb.

You should Only be suspended for the amount of time that was left in that quarter. You definitely shouldn’t be suspended for an entire quarter for something that happened with 40s left in the game. That is the ridiculous part.
 
#24
#24
35 had already done so, from that point its targeting regardless.

He lowered his helmet to make the tackle. It is not illegal to lower your helmet and drive your shoulder through a defender. The contact came as the runner stopped his momentum and Lowered his head and changed direction. That’s how they ended up hitting heads. If he (the offensive player) wouldn’t of lowered his head the defenders head would have never of made contact.

Edit: When he ducked his head where exactly was the defender supposed to be able to attack cleanly? Because the only point that could be attacked was the head.
 
  • Like
Reactions: TennesseeJet
Advertisement



Back
Top