Swain is correct.
He's taking an unpopular position, but it's the right one. For whatever reason, the fans want to blame EVERY SINGLE PROBLEM with the offense on the O-line. The O-line has struggled at times, but the issue is that even when it's providing great pass protection, Dobbs' accuracy on medium- and long- passes has been suspect.
Fans who think our "O-LINE IS TERRIBLE!" are in denial. At the end of last season, our O-line was fantastic. Our O-line absolutely destroyed Northwestern. We dominated against Vanderbilt and Kentucky. Dobbs still struggled with accuracy on deep balls. Sure, the O-line struggled with pass protection during parts of the App State and VT games, but even when the O-line gave Dobbs 8 seconds to throw, Dobbs still had troubles. Yet, there are so many people here at VN who continue to blame every single problem with the offense on the O-line.
It's very simple: Dobbs is not a very good medium- and long- range passer. That's all there is to it. It doesn't mean he doesn't give us the best chance to win. It doesn't mean he's not a great player. It just means that he does not thrive as a "pocket passer" who "airs it out". Dobbs is more Tim Tebow than Peyton Manning. Let's accept that.
However, Dobbs' passing struggles are one reason why I think a 2-QB system (similar to what Texas is doing) with Dobbs and Dormady would be intriguing. Dormady is a much better passer than Dobbs, but Dobbs creates an intangible element with his running abilities. Regardless, the worst mistake we could make is turning Dobbs into something he isn't (which is what it looked like we tried to do versus App State).
So I agree with Swain. Fans are in denial, but look at Dobbs' career stats. He's always had issues with accuracy on medium and long range throws. It's not "the O-line." Our pass protection has been poor in a few games over the past few seasons, but Dobbs has struggled throwing even when pass protection has been great.