Who cares? He won games at the University of Tennessee. Anything else is irrelevant.
He won it all on his own. It had nothing to do with several all SEC O linemen. It had nothing to do with the Dante Stallworths, Kelly Washingtons, Jason Wittens, or any other receiver. Casey Clausen single handedly won those games with his awesome competitive spirit and will to win.........Hahahahahaha. The argument that Casey Clausen is good because Crompton sucks is a horrible position to take. How about, they both suck. It just so happens that one is worse than the other.
He won it all on his own. It had nothing to do with several all SEC O linemen. It had nothing to do with the Dante Stallworths, Kelly Washingtons, Jason Wittens, or any other receiver. Casey Clausen single handedly won those games with his awesome competitive spirit and will to win.........Hahahahahaha. The argument that Casey Clausen is good because Crompton sucks is a horrible position to take. How about, they both suck. It just so happens that one is worse than the other.
He won it all on his own. It had nothing to do with several all SEC O linemen. It had nothing to do with the Dante Stallworths, Kelly Washingtons, Jason Wittens, or any other receiver. Casey Clausen single handedly won those games with his awesome competitive spirit and will to win.........
Ummm.... NO. Clausen played behind a very, very good OL. He played with better receivers than UT has now unless a couple have break out seasons. He had bricks for feet... and a barely avg arm. In short, he would have been worse than horrible if he'd been in UT's O last year.
He won it all on his own. It had nothing to do with several all SEC O linemen. It had nothing to do with the Dante Stallworths, Kelly Washingtons, Jason Wittens, or any other receiver. Casey Clausen single handedly won those games with his awesome competitive spirit and will to win.........Hahahahahaha. The argument that Casey Clausen is good because Crompton sucks is a horrible position to take. How about, they both suck. It just so happens that one is worse than the other.
Why are they morons.
Casey had a personality that rubbed some people worng therefore they didnt like him.
His record was good but there are flaws.
he never beat uga
the uf wins were against zook
the road record never included a (starting) trip to LSU
Why are they morons.
Casey had a personality that rubbed some people worng therefore they didnt like him.
His record was good but there are flaws.
he never beat uga
the uf wins were against zook
the road record never included a (starting) trip to LSU
so if you wanted to throw some darts at him you could.
but looking back at the guy i liked him and I wish all our qbs had the heart he had.
Can we take in to account the offensive coordinators in this discussion? I mean Casey benefitted from albeit an avg. coordinator (R. Sanders I think). Ainge benefited from Cutcliffe but Crompton was the result of Clawson's offense. Clawson didn't help Crompton or the offense out at all. Between the line changing and inconsistent running backs you could have plugged in Peyton Manning (yeah i said it) and that offense would still be bad. Still losing games to the likes of UCLA, and possible Wyoming.
Can we take in to account the offensive coordinators in this discussion? I mean Casey benefitted from albeit an avg. coordinator (R. Sanders I think). Ainge benefited from Cutcliffe but Crompton was the result of Clawson's offense. Clawson didn't help Crompton or the offense out at all. Between the line changing and inconsistent running backs you could have plugged in Peyton Manning (yeah i said it) and that offense would still be bad. Still losing games to the likes of UCLA, and possible Wyoming.