Well, I think the primary purpose was because Dooley thought he would a good DC. He was Alabama's LB coach and they had some ridiculous LB groups during his tenure. Of course, a big part of that was talent, but most thought Sunseri was a pretty good hire. It turned out that, like Dooley, he was a good position coach but a terrible X's and O's guy. He couldn't communicate the gameplan, as evidenced by some of the disgustingly bad sets we ran on defense with players way out of position.
I don't think it was anything more than people thinking it would work out and it didn't. That's what it comes down to most of the time.
Wow.Dooley being a lawyer, I always thought he was never in it for coaching... just the money. I feel Dooley made a deal with Sunseri. He told Sunseri to make the defense too complicated for anyone to understand so that it would cave. So bad that it would cause the UT staff to fire the entire staff...
Why would a man want to be fired? Easy, big paycheck after forcing the University's hand to breach the contract by sucking.
I like juicy stories. The Dooley era is over, but it's always fun to bring back the past till game day. I'm hoping this forum has members who can now tell us the real story on things.
Question number 1:
What was the purpose of Sunseri being our DC at that time?
Thanks.
Personally, I think that Lance Thompson would have done a better job than Sal did. Lance was already on board with us as the LB coach and did a good job. The defensive players even wanted him to be promoted to D.C.
When Sal was hired, Lance left and returned to "O Bama". That hire got Dooley fired! Just like Fulmer's hire of Clawson got him fired!
Had the defense been better coached, in 2012, we would have had a real good season. The offense was good with C.P., Zack Rogers, etc. etc.so offense was not an issue.
I like juicy stories. The Dooley era is over, but it's always fun to bring back the past till game day. I'm hoping this forum has members who can now tell us the real story on things.
Question number 1:
What was the purpose of Sunseri being our DC at that time?
Thanks.
(1) Word gets around in the coaching circles of how he treated the other D.C. before he left for Washington.
I like juicy stories. The Dooley era is over, but it's always fun to bring back the past till game day. I'm hoping this forum has members who can now tell us the real story on things.
Question number 1:
What was the purpose of Sunseri being our DC at that time?
Thanks.
No reputable DC wanted to come work for a coach who was clearly on a path to be fired sooner rather than later. That's why Dooley could only find a position coach who wasn't a current DC. Wilcox saw the writing on the wall and jumped off the sinking ship. Only a guy a like Buddy Hackett would sign on to take a pay raise and change in title for one year and then move back to being a position coach.
Dooley being a lawyer, I always thought he was never in it for coaching... just the money. I feel Dooley made a deal with Sunseri. He told Sunseri to make the defense too complicated for anyone to understand so that it would cave. So bad that it would cause the UT staff to fire the entire staff...
Why would a man want to be fired? Easy, big paycheck after forcing the University's hand to breach the contract by sucking.