Story on ESPN

#4
#4
VolTSX23 said:
Yea I just think its B.S. that they can, but wont do anything
Click to expand...


Yeah, kind of makes me want to put my hands around Barker's neck. A damn teacher in the school system got 90 days and this kid gets 10 years? He was only 17. I can't believe they won't make the new law retroactive for him.
 
#6
#6
Jasongivm6 said:
Yeah, kind of makes me want to put my hands around Barker's neck. A damn teacher in the school system got 90 days and this kid gets 10 years? He was only 17. I can't believe they won't make the new law retroactive for him.
Click to expand...

Barker sounds like a huge egotistical prick! That was the same thing I thought The teacher only gets 90 days, how'd that happen in the first place. Second he as 17 and she was 15. She was doing it to him so he gets 10 yrs? I found this absolutely crazy!
 
#8
#8
I dont know about that. The way I read that law was that a 15 and 17 year olds get you 10 years, yet, a 17 and a 10 will get you nothing? :no:
 
#9
#9
tdtnvols2004 said:
I dont know about that. The way I read that law was that a 15 and 17 year olds get you 10 years, yet, a 17 and a 10 will get you nothing? :no:
Click to expand...


A 17 year old and 15 having intercourse will get you a misdemeanor. A 17 year old getting oral sex from a 15 year old is a felony. I'm pretty sure that most teachers are older than 18, too.
 
#11
#11
Jasongivm6 said:
A 17 year old and 15 having intercourse will get you a misdemeanor. A 17 year old getting oral sex from a 15 year old is a felony. I'm pretty sure that most teachers are older than 18, too.
Click to expand...
So if he would've stuck it in her instead of getting a bj it wouldn't have been as bad? That is absurd.

I hope that most wasn't too suggestive. If it was I apologize.
 
#12
#12
utvol0427 said:
So if he would've stuck it in her instead of getting a bj it wouldn't have been as bad? That is absurd.

I hope that most wasn't too suggestive. If it was I apologize.
Click to expand...

Thats what I dont understand, what the big deal is. He would have gotten a lesser sentence if they actually had intercourse? But just cause he got oral from a girl willing to do it he gets 10 years. This is said, and the worst part is the changed the law, but he doesnt qualify for it. B.S.
 
New Posts
You must log in or register to reply here.

Advertisement



Back
Top