Spurrier was surprised UT did not have a running back stay in to help block Clowney.

#51
#51
Perhaps your reaching a little to far here... its quite sad actually

Whatever is going to happen is going to happen, This constant campaign to prove CDD shouldn't be here is getting old. Get over it.. sit back, take a deep breath and wait for the official announcement.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 3 people
#52
#52
Ignorant OP, Tiny dominated him all game so on that play our coaches confidence in Tiny is a horrible coaching decision? Please! Not to mention, that decision has ZERO to do with Dooley. You think Dooley is calling out blocking schemes over the headset? If you dont like Dooley and want to find every chance to 'call him out for being horrible' at least make sure your evidence is at least slightly credible.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 4 people
#53
#53
The officiating was bad all the way around, but he was being held for a good majority of the game, especially on the last play where he forced the fumble. However, if you can get away with it, then more power to you.
 
#54
#54
“I thought Tennessee would tell that back to wait on him inside, but he stayed on the outside,” Spurrier said.
Clowney, who combines power and speed in a 6-foot-6, 256-pound frame, also expected to be chipped by a running back.
http://www.tennessean.com/article/2...xt|Sports Tennessee Volunteers&nclick_check=1

Just a stretch here but perhaps we didn't ask the rb to stay in and help block perhaps the best defensive player in the country on the most critical play of the game because we don't have a real coach?

Did you watch the rest of the game where Tiny handled Clowney by himself?
 
#55
#55
The officiating was bad all the way around, but he was being held for a good majority of the game, especially on the last play where he forced the fumble. However, if you can get away with it, then more power to you.

Nope. Well officiated game. Holds happen EVERY play, of EVERY game.

Tiny had a magnificent game, but Clowney being the playmaker he is, made the biggest play of the game when it mattered most.

It was a fun battle to watch all day.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
#56
#56
Nope. Well officiated game. Holds happen EVERY play, of EVERY game.

Tiny had a magnificent game, but Clowney being the playmaker he is, made the biggest play of the game when it mattered most.

It was a fun battle to watch all day.

That officiating was a joke. The horse collar was a bad call, as was the no-call for grounding. Clowney got blatantly held for a good portion of the game. Tiny was literally bearhugging him on the sack, but he got through it anyway.
 
#58
#58
That officiating was a joke. The horse collar was a bad call, as was the no-call for grounding. Clowney got blatantly held for a good portion of the game. Tiny was literally bearhugging him on the sack, but he got through it anyway.

Yes agree with you here. Holding on the line happens in every game to an extent though. I don't know if I'd say it was a bear hug as much as him trying to hold him back with one arm. I guess that would be a bear hug to the average size man.

The bad officiating hurt UT more than y'all. The 2 you mentioned were bad and I'd add the keeping the clock going when shaw stepped out of bounds forcing Dooley to use the timeout. No one saw it so he didn't know to argue it with them. The ref should of seen it.
 
#59
#59
Yes agree with you here. Holding on the line happens in every game to an extent though. I don't know if I'd say it was a bear hug as much as him trying to hold him back with one arm. I guess that would be a bear hug to the average size man.

The bad officiating hurt UT more than y'all. The 2 you mentioned were bad and I'd add the keeping the clock going when shaw stepped out of bounds forcing Dooley to use the timeout. No one saw it so he didn't know to argue it with them. The ref should of seen it.

I can agree with this.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
#60
#60
They shredded SC's defense all day.. Maybe if we could hold teams to under 500 yards in conference play, and not let them score around 40 a game... That might help...

Our offense has been awesome except against bama. Which was expected. If we even give up 10 points less a game we would have only lost one game. Even crappy defense gives up 18-22 points a game. We are far worse than crappy. How do we give up 37, 51, 41, 41, and 38 points. We played all kinds of different offense and haven't even slowed them down. Even if we give up 28 points have a chance. The offense has no choice but to just pad stats.
 
Advertisement



Back
Top