BruisedOrange
Well... known member
- Joined
- Oct 21, 2013
- Messages
- 8,500
- Likes
- 24,127
Poorly worded. I meant build into the contract legally that unsafe or untested chemicals won't be introduced by various manufacturers in order to meet deadlines. But that should include having independent labs testing batches regularly to confirm that they are abiding by the contract. Otherwise, you might as well do it on a handshake and save money on lawyers.Not saying you're wrong, but do you really think the chemical compound of dyes in the uniforms is something the UTAD spends time concerning themselves over? I find that difficult to believe. Furthermore, how exactly do you "monitor" such a thing? Isn't that Nike's or Adidas' job?
Global supply chains are currently less predictable into the near future than they have been in decades. For example: Trump is about to end/replace the USMCA agreement with Canada and Mexico. GE Appliances (owned by China's Haier Group) is moving their production from China to Kentucky. Much of China's export into the US is assembled in and comes through Canada and Mexico. Everything tangible is moving, changing, rerouting.
I'm just saying that with so much instability, this is not the time to blindly trust large corporations who operate on small margins. That's not a political statement. It's just an economic-logistical reality. Everything is in flux, and if we've learned anything over the past 6 years, it's that protecting the end users is the last priority.