Someone please explain to me

[phi0129]

The fascination with this "Kiss of Death" thing. Because the majority of our coaching candidates lost a game this weekend, all of a sudden Fulmer is the better option because he beat Vandy? Are you kidding me????Everyone knows that upsets happen, hell we got beat by Wyoming and UCLA for crying out loud. None of the losses this past weekend even come close to the patheticness to those two. Fulmerites will look for any reason to whine and support their arguments. It's ironic that some fans think that potential coaches losing one game makes them unfit to be our coach when Fulmer is on track to provide the university with the worst season in its HISTORY.
:banghead2:

 

[SURFSIDEBEACHVOL]

The fascination is shared only by a few delusional fans

 

[erob3833]

i don't know how they can say that, if we played a well balanced offensive team we'd be screwed. the qb situation just screams coaching screw up.

 

[VolunteerHillbilly]

I am keeping my fingers crossed that the die hards will make good on thier Alex Baldwinian threats to flee the program once Fulmer is gone.

 

[BigPapaVol]

I am keeping my fingers crossed that the die hards will make good on thier Alex Baldwinian threats to flee the program once Fulmer is gone.

doesn't this descriptor make your crossed fingers moot?

 

[LIvol]

the problem is not second-guessing a hiring of a new coach, it is more about picking each coach because he is ranked in the top 15 polls, and then when they play competition up to SEC standards they lose. We have been through patterson, leach, kelly, skip holtz, jim leavitt, bronco mendenhall, and kyle whittingham.....and most of those people were on the bandwagon because the coach had just pulled off an upset or a major victory.