Enigmatic_Vol
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Oct 27, 2012
- Messages
- 410
- Likes
- 804
People have "idealistic" memories of certain coaches due to media without realizing that head coach was either A) scumbag cheater (like Sherrill or Bear) or B) a mediocre head coach (like Leach or Beamer)Jackie Sherrill cheated. Every coaching job he had, he broke the rules. He’d get caught, and the program paid the price. That’s not a great coach, in my opinion. I don’t care if he was good with the Xs and Os. He was “dirty.”

Jackie Sherrill cheated. Every coaching job he had, he broke the rules. He’d get caught, and the program paid the price. That’s not a great coach, in my opinion. I don’t care if he was good with the Xs and Os. He was “dirty.”
As did many other coaches with Alabama connections: Bahr, Sherrill, Mike Dubose, Danny Ford, Howard Schnellenberger, Nick Saban.............and many others, brain's not working right now.Jackie Sherrill cheated. Every coaching job he had, he broke the rules. He’d get caught, and the program paid the price. That’s not a great coach, in my opinion. I don’t care if he was good with the Xs and Os. He was “dirty.”
Every coach was dirty. It was impossible to win at a high level if you didn’t cheat.Jackie Sherrill cheated. Every coaching job he had, he broke the rules. He’d get caught, and the program paid the price. That’s not a great coach, in my opinion. I don’t care if he was good with the Xs and Os. He was “dirty.”
I've taken this argument on before, but the players in 1999 that replaced Peerless Price, Shawn Bryson, Al Wilson, Jermaine Copeland, all had to be better than each of them for the 1999 team to be "more talented". None of them were close to as good. For me, 1998 wins the talent competition.I think the ‘99 team was more talented, they just lacked the leadership of the previous year.
I agree on talent....Cedrick Wilson while good was not a replacement for Peerless Price and having Eric Parker as a feature WR was not it...I've taken this argument on before, but the players in 1999 that replaced Peerless Price, Shawn Bryson, Al Wilson, Jermaine Copeland, all had to be better than each of them for the 1999 team to be "more talented". None of them were close to as good. For me, 1998 wins the talent competition.
I have think you nailed it as far as going through the motions. There were several players that I always thought made business decisions as the year wore on. I guess it’s inevitable once a group gets a ring.I agree on talent....Cedrick Wilson while good was not a replacement for Peerless Price and having Eric Parker as a feature WR was not it...
Losing Al Wilson was a leader that couldn't be replaced....most of the coaching staff and team (especially Tee Martin) went thru the motions after the Florida loss....
That team was one bad Chavis defensive drive from playing Florida State for the NC again, and also was one lucky Tee Martin Hail Mary against Memphis from going 8-4
1989-90, 1995, 1997 and 2001 were more "talented" than the NC team and 1999 teams though
