RPI

[rwemyss]

not THAT good. This is using the formula the selection committee will use at the end of the year... while it doesn't mean crap right now, its fun to look at.

http://teamrankings.com/ncb/8powerratings.php3

 

[volbreaker]

not THAT good. This is using the formula the selection committee will use at the end of the year... while it doesn't mean crap right now, its fun to look at.

http://teamrankings.com/ncb/8powerratings.php3

Wow !!!

 

[McCat]

Wow !!!

It's a nice feather in your cap, fo sho.

 

[BocaVol]

These rankings are nice, but they are severely out of whack. They have UT #4 going 1-0 vs. top 25, 0-0 against 26-50 and 2-1 vs. 51-100 while Pittsburgh who is undefeated is #9 while going 3-0 vs. top 25, 1-0 vs. 26-50, and 3-0 vs. 51-100. Go figure.

 

[Hoosier_Vol]

This will continue to help us in march if we keep it up!

 

[rwemyss]

These rankings are nice, but they are severely out of whack. They have UT #4 going 1-0 vs. top 25, 0-0 against 26-50 and 2-1 vs. 51-100 while Pittsburgh who is undefeated is #9 while going 3-0 vs. top 25, 1-0 vs. 26-50, and 3-0 vs. 51-100. Go figure.

Maybe if you understood how RPI works then you'd understand why the Vols make their way up to #4... It uses not only YOUR winning percentage, but that of your opponents. Pitt must have some numbers going against them. Maybe a couple of their opponents have been EXTREMELY poor? I dunno, but the numbers don't lie. Its not like some biased guy voting in a poll... this is the RPI formula, and it has been used this way for years.