VolPack22
Jessica Alba wears my Daddy hat
- Joined
- Aug 11, 2014
- Messages
- 36,719
- Likes
- 100,196
Just saw on ESPN where they said Tennessee and South Carolina are excited to renew their rivalry. Why do people use the word rivalry so loosely? To me we only have 3 true rivals in the SEC. Alabama, Florida, and Georgia. I guess you could say Auburn too but we really don't play them but every 6 years now that they have the stupid rotation for cross-divisional games since they stubbornly keep the 8 game setup as opposed to going to 9 games but that's another subject. The real reason for this thread is to ask everyone do they really consider Vanderbilt, Kentucky and South Carolina as rivals? I know I sure as heck don't. They all have been our personal doormats for an extended period of time now. I mean look at the record against each:
Vanderbilt: 75-30-5(11 losses against since 1935)
Kentucky: 78-24-9(14 losses against since 1935)
South Carolina: 25-7-2(SEC member since 1992, only played sparingly before then)
Total: 178-61-16
We have beaten these 3 teams 75% of the time throughout our history and that's including the first 20 or so years where our football team just wasn't really a football team and lost to Vanderbilt and Kentucky a lot to start off those series. If you take out those first 20 years then I'm sure our winning percentage is in the 80s without a doubt. So if you beat teams as much as we have beaten these 3 over an extended period of time why do people consider them rivals? I see no justification to even consider them as legit SEC football teams, let alone rivals.
Vanderbilt: 75-30-5(11 losses against since 1935)
Kentucky: 78-24-9(14 losses against since 1935)
South Carolina: 25-7-2(SEC member since 1992, only played sparingly before then)
Total: 178-61-16
We have beaten these 3 teams 75% of the time throughout our history and that's including the first 20 or so years where our football team just wasn't really a football team and lost to Vanderbilt and Kentucky a lot to start off those series. If you take out those first 20 years then I'm sure our winning percentage is in the 80s without a doubt. So if you beat teams as much as we have beaten these 3 over an extended period of time why do people consider them rivals? I see no justification to even consider them as legit SEC football teams, let alone rivals.