Risky hires of the past...

[volfannbama]

I never said it didn’t happen. I mean after the initial hires and initial bashing it was all good.

I agree. Like whats going on the pastors thread. We might make it a moral issue whether you are for or against but it really has nothing to do with morality for most. It's more risk/ reward.
If you are willing to accept the risk people will make a "moral" argument for forgivness etc.
If you think the risk is too much, people will make a "moral" argument against adultery etc.
The morality is only used in an attmept to sway like minded thinkers. But in reality it's all risk / reward.

 

[GetEmVols]

I agree. Like whats going on the pastors thread. We might make it a moral issue whether you are for or against but it really has nothing to do with morality for most. It's more risk/ reward.
If you are willing to accept the risk people will make a "moral" argument for forgivness etc.
If you think the risk is too much, people will make a "moral" argument against adultery etc.
The morality is only used in an attmept to sway like minded thinkers. But in reality it's all risk / reward.

And all of our opponents will be like Jesus when it comes to morals.

 

[Samuellbronkowitz]

Luckily, we put a stop to one last year before he became our next HC.

 

[GetEmVols]

Luckily, we put a stop to one last year before he became our next HC.

Very true

 

[orangerush]

There all risky hires until proven otherwise.

 

[Doberman]

Ray Lewis

 

[TheVolsFrog]

And yet the media doesn’t bash him anymore. Just like they won’t with Hugh Freeze.

Winning takes care of everything and I'm ready to win.
If you got a guy who's known for winning and you can land him, you go get him.
Doubt any program at this level is squeaky clean and I'm not saying if X jumps off a bridge we follow but this team has got to stop worry about what the next team thinks or what the so called analyst will say.
The only real exception is touching on kids. No matter how many wins they have that type of person is a no go