Orange Studs
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Jun 24, 2010
- Messages
- 25,663
- Likes
- 48,708
Even if there isn't a morals clause in his contract (incredibly doubtful), or his morals clause doesn't mention stuff like this, they could still get him for a violation of university policy. "You must follow university rules" clauses are boilerplate too and I'm sure having an affair with a subordinate is forbidden under those rules.
The enemy of our enemies (Bama and UGA) is our friend, which makes Auburn (enemies: Bama and UGA) as much of a friend as one can have in the SEC, where we just hate more.
But it's always nice to have the dumpster fire burning on someone else's campus.
You're talking when Alabama was down though. And those were good times.I see a lot of hypothetical "Strong Auburn should help Tennessee" but when has that been true? When did we directly benefit from Auburn being good? They didn't help us get to Atlanta in 2007. They beat us twice in 2004 when we went to Atlanta. They didn't have anything to do with us going to Atlanta in 2001. They didn't help or hurt us in 1998. We had to beat a "strong Auburn" in 1997 to win the SEC.
In reality, I can think of many, many occasions that they have beat us for recruits that we need.
They have directly and indirectly done more damage to Tennessee since 2000 than we have directly or indirectly benefited from a "strong Auburn." A weak Tennessee has benefited Auburn far more than a strong Auburn would ever benefit Tennessee.
So I'll ask again, when have we directly benefited from a strong Auburn?
Just a minor quibble: we don’t go to Atlanta without Auburn beating Florida in 2007.I see a lot of hypothetical "Strong Auburn should help Tennessee" but when has that been true? When did we directly benefit from Auburn being good? They didn't help us get to Atlanta in 2007. They beat us twice in 2004 when we went to Atlanta. They didn't have anything to do with us going to Atlanta in 2001. They didn't help or hurt us in 1998. We had to beat a "strong Auburn" in 1997 to win the SEC.
In reality, I can think of many, many occasions that they have beat us for recruits that we need.
They have directly and indirectly done more damage to Tennessee since 2000 than we have directly or indirectly benefited from a "strong Auburn." A weak Tennessee has benefited Auburn far more than a strong Auburn would ever benefit Tennessee.
So I'll ask again, when have we directly benefited from a strong Auburn?
Being relevant in the not too distant past does wonders for your PR. It's also why Florida doesn't really get picked on.And they should be rightfully flamed by everyone in the media like we are. Yet they won’t.
That's a fair point, but we owe just as much to South Carolina for us getting to Atlanta in 07. That season was just crazy in general. And it ultimately took us beating UGA's ass by our damn selves to secure our trip to Atlanta.Just a minor quibble: we don’t go to Atlanta without Auburn beating Florida in 2007.