Girth Brooks
What’chu say about my mama?
- Joined
- Apr 30, 2019
- Messages
- 2,551
- Likes
- 50,664
I had bad dreams about mountain lions for years after I read "Where the red fern grows" in the third grade.Not sure. I do know microscopically, in Yellowstone that after their reintroduction i Hayden Valley Mule Deer and Elk Populations stabilized, where they had been declining.
They are very, very smart animals. And integral. Ergo doesnt surprise me one bit.
Anyway, one animal that always had me un nerved is Mountain Lion. You'll never know what hit you.
I liked the sit for a year if you transfer rule, but if they are going let some be eligible immediately then all should be. The SEC finally caved on the grad transfer and will eventually have to with the one time transfer rule. We'll just have to live with the consequences.Not really overriding, just additional rules, like the sec having control over sec transfer waivers now. They can always have stricter rules for themselves, just not looser, which would be overriding. I think there was similar lag with grad transfers, with the SEC still restricting years after the NCAA allowed them.
Honestly I would hate to get Mondon and Mims and have to wonder how often Auburn and UGA kept inviting them to cabins and such all freshmen year and trying to get them to transfer through backchannels.
That's me. Except spiders. They must die.See, I'm a quarter mile from Broadway, I-40 and 640, in Knoxville, so I've never seen or heard a coyote, around my house and probably never will. So, although I've heard, what a pain in the a$$, they are, I've never seen it. Plus, I'm soft, I don't even like to kill spiders, the only thing I've really killed on purpose is a couple of mice and rats and I felt bad about the mice
I think it was the livestock association in Texas...the local ranchers straight up hated those things, I can't remember how much it was, it was 36 years ago, but I rememberbeing shocked at the number. The bounty hunters kept them well in check.In the old days state paid a bounty, and then you could sell the hides. FLA should do the same with pythons.
And not just ag but all development, residential, parks, whatever. We’ve unwittingly created a perfect habitat for a clever, stealthy, adaptable and very mobile animal that can eat damn near anything, and we’ve removed all natural predators above them. They’re here to stay.Also, by changing the landscape from woodlands to more agriculture was another key factor in the expansion of the coyote. Their expansion was most definitely aided by humans.
they are in suburbs now.
TWRA considers nuisance animal. Refuse to relocate. I was told 'check with municipality before discharging a weapon'...'we wont intervene'.
My wife said it cant get in over our fence check that, they can.
Unfortunately in city its either poison or hand to hand combat.
We’re neighbors! I live about 2 miles from Halls High school, myself.See, I'm a quarter mile from Broadway, I-40 and 640, in Knoxville, so I've never seen or heard a coyote, around my house and probably never will. So, although I've heard, what a pain in the a$$, they are, I've never seen it. Plus, I'm soft, I don't even like to kill spiders, the only thing I've really killed on purpose is a couple of mice and rats and I felt bad about the mice
Correct. Both grey and red wolf extirpation from the contiguous states were contributing factors. It allowed them to expand without predation and fill the niche. I would call that indirect. When I say "direct" I mean humans didn't introduce the animal to new areas.Their expansion was aided by the overhunting of the timber wolf and extirpation from many states across the country.
Again, 100% aided by what I would call indirect contribution. Direct contribution, by my terminology, would be the introduction of a non-native. With coyotes, humans indirectly created optimal conditions and they took advantage of it and naturalized themselves on the landscape.Also, by changing the landscape from woodlands to more agriculture was another key factor in the expansion of the coyote. Their expansion was most definitely aided by humans.
I agree with Soil here. Just because it was humans that cleared out farmland does not mean they have a direct impact. Niches need to be filled and the coyote took advantage of itAgain, 100% aided by what I would call indirect contribution. Direct contribution, by my terminology, would be the introduction of a non-native. With coyotes, humans indirectly created optimal conditions and they took advantage of it and naturalized themselves on the landscape.