Just want to add some perspective on this thread. I was recruited by the Naval Academy to run track and cross-country and did my 4 years in Annapolis from 1989 to 1993. I then paid back my education with 6 years of service in the Marine Corps.
Appointment Process and treatment of athletes being recruited: There are about 10,000+ qualified nominations a year. Congressman, Senators, and even Secretary of Defense have nomination power. I received my nomination from Jimmy Quillen, R-TN. In the end the Appointment Board determines by vote who out of the 10,000 nominations get in (which has been running a little over 1,000 per year for all academies).
Athletes in the appointment process do have an advantage, but must meet the requirements. In my case I met the requirements (barely), but would not have stood on my own without athletics. So not having the strongest case for me, the Athletic Director pulled my file so he was the one presenting me to the appointment board and not a representative from the State of Tennessee.
After an athlete is appointed if he/she decides they do not want to play the sport that got them there in the first place (along with academics nonetheless) they can drop out of the sport and continue life as a Cadet/Midshipman etc... What happens is since it is so rigorous some athletes who got in to play football for instance, do drop out of the sport along the way to focus on academics (aka actually graduating). Even out of these kids who are our best and brightest some have to make a choice that the sport is infringing on their ability to make academic requirements and focus on graduation (we do not have PE majors at the Academies). Some guys I was recruited along side dropped out of track to focus on academy life.
Concerning pay, I remember my pay was exactly $453 per month. Out of this I paid for uniforms, tailoring of uniforms, shoes, shoe repair, books, alumni fund, etc.. etc... etc... So basically year 1 at the end of deductions per month I received around $50-$75. That went to buying cleaning supplies for my room and maybe occasionally a meal out in town on the 12 hours I was able to leave the premises each week year 1 (but most weekends I was on a bus traveling to a track meet). By my last year I was able to pocket $250 or so but now had a car on campus and they actually trusted me to leave the entire weekend! (only seniors can have cars on campus).
The above pay scenario forms my opinion on how we could pay athletes. Flat rate for everyone. Basically college football players are very much like we were at the academy. Scholarship, or in my case appointment paid for everything including 3 square meals a day, tuition etc.. BUT very similar to a college football player at a major D1 school, if the Academy allowed me to have a job, there was absolutely not enough time in the day to hold down a part time job to have a little spend cash. But I still needed some money to have some sort of relief or else for 4 years I would have to stay on campus and never be able to leave making me a social retard. This is why people who say that for NCAA athletes the scholly is their pay for play do not get it. You have more expenses in college than room, board and tuition. Football much like my track took up all my non-academic time (Track for me was 3 seasons, fall cross-country, winter indoor track, spring outdoor track). My parents did send me $100 every now and then. But some of these football players coming from places like Pahokee, FL do not have 2 nickels to rub together. Give them a couple hundred a month so they can go buy a slice of pizza (but NO TACOS, LOL), take a girl to a movie, or buy some clothes. Hold them to some standard on class attendance etc.. to receive the money or better yet make it tied to their APR promoting the student/athlete not dividing athletes on one side and students on the other.
Just some perspective. Go Navy, Beat Army! They are going to need those 45 players to catch up with us. 12 in a row!