Qanon -The Storm

New: Title TBD
2754

Q!!mG7VJxZNCI 17 Feb 2019 - 1:28:46 PM


DL_Map_July2015.gif

📁
It's very simple - w/o the illegal vote D's lose.
Previous illegal imm high pop v D win by county provided.
[Example 2]
Why do D's push for illegals to obtain a driver's license?
Does having a DL make it easier to vote?
http://www.ncsl.org/research/immigration/states-offering-driver-s-licenses-to-immigrants.aspx📁
What states provide DL's to illegals?
What checks are in place within each of the 'DL granted states' to prevent 2x-3x-4x-5x voting?
Compare v. 2016 Presidential election results.
What do you notice?
Do you believe in coincidences?
Memes are important.
#FactsMatter
Q

I know that in one district in i think it was Maryland in Obama vs romney, 104% of the district voted and 99% of the 104% was Obama.
 
New: Title TBD
2768
Q!!mG7VJxZNCI17 Feb 2019 - 5:04:54 PM

DzlpRPbVsAEYuyS.jpg-large.jpg
Cory Booker 'withholding' judgment on Smollett case after calling it 'attempted modern-day lynching'📁
Harris & Booker applying political pressure re: Chicago PD re: Smollett FF case?
What Bill did the Senate recently pass re: lynching?
Who were the authors of the Bill?
What FF event took place just prior to the passing of the Bill?
Did the FF event involve a 'noose'?
Did the FF event sway Senators in their decision to prevent FAKE NEWS attacks re: Smollett case?
Did FAKE NEWS contact many Senators prior to vote seeking out pro/nay in attempt to coerce using Smollett case as foundation for possible future smear?
What is the mathematical probability of these [2] events occurring within this same time period?
What is the relationship of Smollett & Booker/Harris?
Will Rahm Emanuel get involved?
Will the Chicago PD cave under pressure?
These people are sick!
#WakeUpAmerica
Q
 
  • Like
Reactions: BigOrangeD
New: Title TBD
2769
Q!!mG7VJxZNCI17 Feb 2019 - 5:13:42 PM
New: Title TBD
2768
Q!!mG7VJxZNCI17 Feb 2019 - 5:04:54 PM

DzlpRPbVsAEYuyS.jpg-large.jpg
Cory Booker 'withholding' judgment on Smollett case after calling it 'attempted modern-day lynching'📁
Harris & Booker applying political pressure re: Chicago PD re: Smollett FF case?
What Bill did the Senate recently pass re: lynching?
Who were the authors of the Bill?
What FF event took place just prior to the passing of the Bill?
Did the FF event involve a 'noose'?
Did the FF event sway Senators in their decision to prevent FAKE NEWS attacks re: Smollett case?
Did FAKE NEWS contact many Senators prior to vote seeking out pro/nay in attempt to coerce using Smollett case as foundation for possible future smear?
What is the mathematical probability of these [2] events occurring within this same time period?
What is the relationship of Smollett & Booker/Harris?
Will Rahm Emanuel get involved?
Will the Chicago PD cave under pressure?
These people are sick!
#WakeUpAmerica
Q

DbgWwt6V4AA-nua.jpg
>>5228903
Irony.
Q
 
New: Title TBD
2770
Q!!mG7VJxZNCI17 Feb 2019 - 6:23:28 PM
How do you infiltrate the MSM?
[Example 1]
ABC NEWS exec producer Ian Cameron married to Susan Rice (Nat Sec Advisor - HUSSEIN)?
CBS NEWS/CNN Journ Bianna Vitalievna married to Peter R Orszag (Dir of Office of Mgmt/Budget - HUSSEIN)?
CBS NEWS president David Rhodes brother of Ben Rhodes (Del Nat Sec Advisor - HUSSEIN)?
ABC NEWS correspondent Claire Shipman married to Jay Carney (WH Press Sec - HUSSEIN)?
……………
MSM = arm/extension of the [D] party?
Nothing to See Here.
Q
 
New: Title TBD
2772
Q!!mG7VJxZNCI17 Feb 2019 - 6:44:38 PM
Anonymous17 Feb 2019 - 6:32:20 PM

Influential POTUS.png

Influential Q.png
>>5230278
>time.com/5324130/most-influential-internet/

DzpRF05XcAAv49t.jpg
>>5230378
The World is waking up to the TRUTH.
Expect 'attacks' to dramatically intensify across all platforms.
Q
 
  • Like
Reactions: BigOrangeD
New: Title TBD
2776
Q!!mG7VJxZNCI17 Feb 2019 - 10:02:02 PM
Barr to Mueller:
“Bob, show me the evidence and reasoning for why this investigation was started and still ongoing.”
Mueller to Bart:
“With regards to the President we have found no links or ties to any foreign entity etc”
Barr to Mueller:
“Mandate was clear - verify and investigate reports of possible foreign collusion between President & Russia.” “What justification existed to effectively launch a massive domestic / foreign surv campaign against the President (pres elect / president) and members of his transition / campaign team?”
Mueller to Barr:
“Steele dossier along w/ media corroboration of those findings.”
Barr to Mueller:
“Was the Steele report a ‘trusted and verified’ report per Intel to continue especially considering the funding party was the opposition party?”
Mueller to Barr:
“Those facts were never taken into consideration.” “FISC granted auth to conduct based on conclusions presented.”
Barr to Mueller:
“Was FISC made aware of all details surrounding the dossier?”
Mueller to Barr:
“No.” “We believe there was urgency placed on the auth given the gravity and timeline of events that those involved negated to populate fully.”
Barr to Mueller:
“Why were efforts made to continue investigating the President, interrupt his official capacity in governing, if the only doc presented was unsubstantiated and unverified?” “Why were questions and threat of subpoena communicated to the President if no factual foundation existed?”
“All charges thus far are unrelated to the original mandate - why are you still active and pursuing a crime if no verifiable evidence or evidence through discovery exists?”
Barr to RR:
“What justification did you have to effectively expand the mandate, not report that expansion to Congress, in order to seek a crime outside of R collusion?” “What specific reasoning and/or facts existed to justify the appointment of a SC to begin with per the law?” “Why did you recommend to Sessions that he should recuse?” “Why wasn’t the mandate / budget and regular updates provided to Congress upon request?” “Why is everything kept confidential and under inappropriate classification?” “Was the purpose of investigating to find a crime vs investigate evidence of a crime?”
CLAS 1-99
Q
 
New: Title TBD
2777
Q!!mG7VJxZNCI17 Feb 2019 - 10:03:09 PM
New: Title TBD
2776
Q!!mG7VJxZNCI17 Feb 2019 - 10:02:02 PM
Barr to Mueller:
“Bob, show me the evidence and reasoning for why this investigation was started and still ongoing.”
Mueller to Bart:
“With regards to the President we have found no links or ties to any foreign entity etc”
Barr to Mueller:
“Mandate was clear - verify and investigate reports of possible foreign collusion between President & Russia.” “What justification existed to effectively launch a massive domestic / foreign surv campaign against the President (pres elect / president) and members of his transition / campaign team?”
Mueller to Barr:
“Steele dossier along w/ media corroboration of those findings.”
Barr to Mueller:
“Was the Steele report a ‘trusted and verified’ report per Intel to continue especially considering the funding party was the opposition party?”
Mueller to Barr:
“Those facts were never taken into consideration.” “FISC granted auth to conduct based on conclusions presented.”
Barr to Mueller:
“Was FISC made aware of all details surrounding the dossier?”
Mueller to Barr:
“No.” “We believe there was urgency placed on the auth given the gravity and timeline of events that those involved negated to populate fully.”
Barr to Mueller:
“Why were efforts made to continue investigating the President, interrupt his official capacity in governing, if the only doc presented was unsubstantiated and unverified?” “Why were questions and threat of subpoena communicated to the President if no factual foundation existed?”
“All charges thus far are unrelated to the original mandate - why are you still active and pursuing a crime if no verifiable evidence or evidence through discovery exists?”
Barr to RR:
“What justification did you have to effectively expand the mandate, not report that expansion to Congress, in order to seek a crime outside of R collusion?” “What specific reasoning and/or facts existed to justify the appointment of a SC to begin with per the law?” “Why did you recommend to Sessions that he should recuse?” “Why wasn’t the mandate / budget and regular updates provided to Congress upon request?” “Why is everything kept confidential and under inappropriate classification?” “Was the purpose of investigating to find a crime vs investigate evidence of a crime?”
CLAS 1-99
Q
>>5234560
Disregard any misspelling.
On the move.
Q
 
POTUS Tweets About Barr Restoring Credibility to DOJ 79 Minutes After Q's Barr Drop
2778
Q!!mG7VJxZNCI17 Feb 2019 - 11:34:08 PM
AG Barr, Special Counsel Mueller and Rod Rosenstein Discuss Russia Investigation
2776
Q!!mG7VJxZNCI17 Feb 2019 - 10:02:02 PM
Barr to Mueller:
“Bob, show me the evidence and reasoning for why this investigation was started and still ongoing.”
Mueller to Bart:
“With regards to the President we have found no links or ties to any foreign entity etc”
Barr to Mueller:
“Mandate was clear - verify and investigate reports of possible foreign collusion between President & Russia.” “What justification existed to effectively launch a massive domestic / foreign surv campaign against the President (pres elect / president) and members of his transition / campaign team?”
Mueller to Barr:
“Steele dossier along w/ media corroboration of those findings.”
Barr to Mueller:
“Was the Steele report a ‘trusted and verified’ report per Intel to continue especially considering the funding party was the opposition party?”
Mueller to Barr:
“Those facts were never taken into consideration.” “FISC granted auth to conduct based on conclusions presented.”
Barr to Mueller:
“Was FISC made aware of all details surrounding the dossier?”
Mueller to Barr:
“No.” “We believe there was urgency placed on the auth given the gravity and timeline of events that those involved negated to populate fully.”
Barr to Mueller:
“Why were efforts made to continue investigating the President, interrupt his official capacity in governing, if the only doc presented was unsubstantiated and unverified?” “Why were questions and threat of subpoena communicated to the President if no factual foundation existed?”
“All charges thus far are unrelated to the original mandate - why are you still active and pursuing a crime if no verifiable evidence or evidence through discovery exists?”
Barr to RR:
“What justification did you have to effectively expand the mandate, not report that expansion to Congress, in order to seek a crime outside of R collusion?” “What specific reasoning and/or facts existed to justify the appointment of a SC to begin with per the law?” “Why did you recommend to Sessions that he should recuse?” “Why wasn’t the mandate / budget and regular updates provided to Congress upon request?” “Why is everything kept confidential and under inappropriate classification?” “Was the purpose of investigating to find a crime vs investigate evidence of a crime?”
CLAS 1-99
Q
>>5234560
📁
Do you believe in coincidences?
Kitchen is HOT.
Q
 
Nothing Can Stop This
2780
Q!!mG7VJxZNCI18 Feb 2019 - 1:07:37 AM
Anonymous18 Feb 2019 - 1:00:22 AM

ClipboardImage.png
Classic deflection - "the dog ate my homework". Evidence of crime is what you need mr FBI, not dislike and bias to open an investigation.

"Former acting FBI Director Andrew McCabe says President Trump's own words were among the reasons top officials decided to open a counterintelligence probe and obstruction of justice investigation into him"



📁
>>5237651

Dead cat bounce.
Nothing can stop this.
Q
 

VN Store



Back
Top