I don't think you cats understand how the scholarship system actually works. A coach or administration can yank a kid's scholarship anytime they choose and depending on institution and internal rules for any reason they choose. Lack of productivity (had a friend at an institution MANY years ago who played his senior year on half scholarship due to "performance" issues his junior year), effort, just see young O'Brien's dismissal recently as an example. So the shcolly is not locked in 4 years no matter what, it's day to day basically and don't think for a second some coaches using it as a carrot and stick motivational tool. So the idea these thousands of dollars are locked in on kids is pish posh. Spurrier should have bounced Clowney off the team if he were laying down and that would be my recommendation for any coach or school, but you cannot make a kid play well. What are you going to do if he's so obstinate and does not want to play he just lays down? Hence why you dont put him out there and to me keep him on the team, cut their donkey same day. But you also can't abuse the kids too much as word gets around you do kids wrong and they avoid playing for you as well, which is why Spurrier caved to Clowney most likely.