VolFootballIsLife
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Oct 4, 2014
- Messages
- 1,531
- Likes
- 1,712
This will probably be a lost cause but let's see if we can keep the discussion on topic for at least a few pages. In-game coaching decisions aside, play calling was actually a bright spot and not the reason for lack of WR production. Here's my take after listening to comments, coaches, players and going back to watch the game (as much as it pained me):
1) First and foremost, NOBODY had an issue with our play calling and gameplan until 4 minutes to go in the 4th. There's no way anyone can honestly say that. It was good enough to give us a 2 score lead with 10 min to go.
2) We owned the ground game and even with that being said we called over 25 passing plays. The reason they didn't produce was mainly OL. UF pass rush got in quick-3 sacks plenty of hurries. That caused Dobbs to either get rid of it quickly, scramble for his life, or abandon the play and run (sometimes a little too soon).
3) We actually threw the ball twice inside the red zone in the 4th with a lead: 10 yard curl completed to WR and the 50/50 ball caught by Von for a TD called back on a penalty. Not bad for aggressive play calling. Hurd eventually ran for the TD.
4) Kerbyson was right when referring to the 16 play 70+ yard drive when he stated we ran the ball 88% of that drive and they couldn't stop it...why would you stray from that.
5) 5 Scoring Drives against a very good D....no need to expand on that
In any case, play calling in that game was, in reality, excellent. It was very successful in fact. Bottom line: if I told you that this was the formula to put you up 2 scores mid way through the 4th in the Swamp to break the streak, why would you argue that considering how successful we were against a very solid D?
1) First and foremost, NOBODY had an issue with our play calling and gameplan until 4 minutes to go in the 4th. There's no way anyone can honestly say that. It was good enough to give us a 2 score lead with 10 min to go.
2) We owned the ground game and even with that being said we called over 25 passing plays. The reason they didn't produce was mainly OL. UF pass rush got in quick-3 sacks plenty of hurries. That caused Dobbs to either get rid of it quickly, scramble for his life, or abandon the play and run (sometimes a little too soon).
3) We actually threw the ball twice inside the red zone in the 4th with a lead: 10 yard curl completed to WR and the 50/50 ball caught by Von for a TD called back on a penalty. Not bad for aggressive play calling. Hurd eventually ran for the TD.
4) Kerbyson was right when referring to the 16 play 70+ yard drive when he stated we ran the ball 88% of that drive and they couldn't stop it...why would you stray from that.
5) 5 Scoring Drives against a very good D....no need to expand on that
In any case, play calling in that game was, in reality, excellent. It was very successful in fact. Bottom line: if I told you that this was the formula to put you up 2 scores mid way through the 4th in the Swamp to break the streak, why would you argue that considering how successful we were against a very solid D?