PFF College ranked UT 2nd best WR group?

#27
#27
We have a nice group of seasoned vets combined with some young guys who could be breakout players in Keaton and Hyatt.


I'm sure we will bring in a couple grad transfers/JUCO Wrs to supplement the young guys in 2021.
 
#28
#28
They rate WR as a top 3 position (qb, wr, cb) in terms of value also. Given we may have a slight edge at qb (their number 1 spot), can hang with them at corner when healthy, and have an edge at wr, it makes me feel like we have a real chance.
 
#29
#29
I am not sure, but I think it means we have a pretty good group of wide receivers. 🥴 Or are you one that only looks at the PFF ratings in regards to QBs?

No I’m one of those guys that thinks 2 games isn’t a large enough sample size to consider these kind of ratings practical.
 
#30
#30
They rate WR as a top 3 position (qb, wr, cb) in terms of value also. Given we may have a slight edge at qb (their number 1 spot), can hang with them at corner when healthy, and have an edge at wr, it makes me feel like we have a real chance.
Guess I’m an idiot. Thought OL and QB were most important. I wouldn’t have WR in my top 5.
 
#31
#31
Guess I’m an idiot. Thought OL and QB were most important. I wouldn’t have WR in my top 5.

Oline is 5 total positions. I wouldn’t put RG or Center above Wr or even in the same ball park in terms of importance.
 
#33
#33
It seems the WRs have been getting a lot of separation. I feel USCe and Missouri had issues keeping up. That may change against UGA but we will find out. We’ve definitely got some burners outside

Nailed it. They have been. Route running must be on point or something b.c the receivers have had lots of space to work with. SC and Mizzou were loading the box but guys were getting open. We'll have to wait and see what they do against the elite defenses.
 
Advertisement



Back
Top