mkil5
Junior Member
- Joined
- Aug 24, 2005
- Messages
- 884
- Likes
- 224
First of all, let me say that I am not huge on recruiting rankings, but I will admit, that the chance a 5* becomes a star is a lot better than a 3* becoming a star.
A lot of people have been saying that we have been going for quality over quantity, which is true, but Georgia has 18 signees, ranked 9th; Florida has 16 signees, ranked 10th; We have the most at 19 and ranked just 17th.
The average star ranking, which is what a lot of people go with by quality of the class is also the lowest at 3.53, Georgia is 3.83, and Florida at 3.94.
However, I believe that there is one stat that has been overlooked with Rivals. Would someone argue that there is a huge difference between someone that has a 5.9 RR and a 5.8 RR? I don't believe that there would be much arguing. How about a 5.8 RR and a 5.7 RR? There is a ton of arguing over the differences between these two, the reason: that is the difference between a 3* and a 4*. A 5.7 is very close to being a 4 star, and by some "scout's" judgment they are a 3 star, and vise versa.
Here is a look at the 5.7 and 5.8 players signed:
Florida - 16
5.7 3* - 2
5.8 4* - 5
Georgia - 18
5.7 3* - 4
5.8 4* - 6
Tennessee - 19
5.7 3* - 6
5.8 4* - 2
Tennessee signed the high 3* guys while the others signed the low 4* guys. While this is not a big difference at all, sometimes determined if Ohio State or Texas or whoever offered. All it does is make a huge difference in the recruiting rankings that everyone goes crazy over, which are absolutely pointless.
Now do I think that we signed a better class than those two? Not really, no, especially since it looks like UGA still has Charles on the way and we did not get the OL and DT like I was hoping. But it is a much better class than many are giving it credit for. And I thought I would share some pointless info I came up with earlier today.
Bash away!
A lot of people have been saying that we have been going for quality over quantity, which is true, but Georgia has 18 signees, ranked 9th; Florida has 16 signees, ranked 10th; We have the most at 19 and ranked just 17th.
The average star ranking, which is what a lot of people go with by quality of the class is also the lowest at 3.53, Georgia is 3.83, and Florida at 3.94.
However, I believe that there is one stat that has been overlooked with Rivals. Would someone argue that there is a huge difference between someone that has a 5.9 RR and a 5.8 RR? I don't believe that there would be much arguing. How about a 5.8 RR and a 5.7 RR? There is a ton of arguing over the differences between these two, the reason: that is the difference between a 3* and a 4*. A 5.7 is very close to being a 4 star, and by some "scout's" judgment they are a 3 star, and vise versa.
Here is a look at the 5.7 and 5.8 players signed:
Florida - 16
5.7 3* - 2
5.8 4* - 5
Georgia - 18
5.7 3* - 4
5.8 4* - 6
Tennessee - 19
5.7 3* - 6
5.8 4* - 2
Tennessee signed the high 3* guys while the others signed the low 4* guys. While this is not a big difference at all, sometimes determined if Ohio State or Texas or whoever offered. All it does is make a huge difference in the recruiting rankings that everyone goes crazy over, which are absolutely pointless.
Now do I think that we signed a better class than those two? Not really, no, especially since it looks like UGA still has Charles on the way and we did not get the OL and DT like I was hoping. But it is a much better class than many are giving it credit for. And I thought I would share some pointless info I came up with earlier today.
Bash away!