BigOrangeTrain
Morior Invictus
- Joined
- Jan 30, 2013
- Messages
- 81,924
- Likes
- 94,875
This guys take is one of an a$$ hat. We are 100% a top 20-25 team and would beat AZ, Tulane, Ptt, SMU, ASU. Likely beat GT, Virginia, UofU, BYU. Could beat TT, but only because I think they are way overrated. Trembly can pound sand. We were competitive with UGA, Bama, OK and simply blew a winnable game against Vandy....
What would you define as „great“? Obviously 8 and 4 isn’t even close. But I always wonder exactly what a coach has to do to be considered top tier.It looks like BVS has reset the bar. This is the attitude that kills programs. Good is the enemy of great. One thing I’ve learned on this forum is I have very little in common with most Vol fans.
And I seem to remember 2 of those wins could have went either way. Half full or half empty. We can make stats says whatever we want. You are what your record says you are. Glad the $13.5 million NIL money was there, or we could have been in real trouble.All the teams we lost to are top 12 teams in the country. Our losses only indicate we're not a top 12 team. We are definitely a top 25 team! 2 of those 4 games could have went either way.
Yep I'm one of those half full type of people!And I seem to remember 2 of those wins could have went either way. Half full or half empty. We can make stats says whatever we want. You are what your record says you are. Glad the $13.5 million NIL money was there, or we could have been in real trouble.
Well the Vols didn't make their schedule. They won the games they were "supposed to". The ball literally bounces another way or a different call here or there and the UGA and OU games are wins.
Tennessee played the BEST team Vanderbilt has ever had in 135 years of their football program, a now 10 win team with a Heisman Trophy contending QB and a roster full of seniors and grad students. Can Vanderbilt get even better? Maybe, with the new college football in the NIL and transfer portal era......
We all know that fist and foremost Tennessee HAS to stockpile quality defensive players in multiple positions.
YOU SIMPLY CANNOT WIN IN THIS LEAGUE WITH NO DEFENSE OR EVEN AN OKAY DEFENSIVE CONSISTENTLY.
Score a lot of points and out score people here and there? Sure every once in a while. But that's how you want to live? Have to be excellent on defense and get off the field or you just simply have no legitimate chance.
Two of those on the list went 11-1. That's not a comparison to 8-4 with the only win over a team with a .500+ conference record and a winning overall record is ETSU, who only finished 3rd in their conference.I’m not impressed or depressed. You’re the one saying there’s no comparison to a list of teams that includes GT.
exactly. you could say the same thing about a lot of ranked teams.
Notre Dame's only "big" win was 9-3 USC
(L) Miami 10-2
(L) TAMU 11-1
(W) Purdue 2-10
(W) Arkansas 2-10
(W) Boise State 8-4 G5
(W) NC State 7-5
(W) USC 9-3
(W) Boston College 2-10
(W) Navy 9-2 G5
(W) Pitt 8-4
(W) Stanford 4-8
P4 teams they beat had a combined 34-50 record
So, 7 of the top 9 have a .500 or better vs the top 9 except for us and Mizzou. Both of us with the big 0-fer. This almost makes it worse.Let's look at the top 9 in the SEC. - I cut it off at 9 instead of 8 because Missouri and Tennessee have the same record.
A&M did not play Georgia, Alabama, Oklahoma or Vandy - let that sink in. They only played 2 teams (Texas and Missouri) in the top 9 of the conference and they were 1-1.
Ole Miss did not play Alabama, Oklahoma, Vandy or A&M. They only played 2 teams in the top 9 of the conference and they were 1-1.
Bama played 5 of the top 9. They were 4-1.
Georgia played 4 of the top 9. They were 3-1.
Vandy played 4 of the top 9. They were 2-2.
Oklahoma played 5 of the top 9. They were 3-2.
Texas played 4 of the top 9. They were 3-1.
Missouri played 4 of the top 9. They were 0-4.
Tennessee played 4 of the top 9. They were 0-4.
Of the teams in the top 9, the only schools that played both the teams in the SEC title game (Georgia and Bama) were Tennessee and Auburn.
