I think it's the fact that we did play a pretty good first half (can't be great with 15 turnovers) that keeps it from being a total disaster and a "poor representation of the game and the program." You have to give UCONN credit for turning up the pressure and exposing our weak ballhandling. The unforced errors were present in both halves, yet we led by 3 at the half. We actually committed fewer turnovers in the second half. If we had committed the same number in both halves and won by six, there would be joy in Mudville regardless.
I seem to remember Parker's national championship team blowing a huge halftime lead to lose by a wide margin, and no one called that team "garbage." Yes, cutting out turnovers is Priority #1. But it can be done. We've got a thin team with some outstanding talent mixed with youth, lack of mobility due to injuries or conditioning, some one-dimensional reserves, and a new team and staff.
These are the bumps in the road we expected, and they are frustrating, especially when the potential can be seen. The ball handling and passing have to improve, and the careless passes have to stop. If these players aren't capable of doing that, they have to be benched in favor of (future) players who will take better care of the ball. Current players who get careless need to come out and settle down; unfortunately, there's a huge dropoff when that happens.
I would never put Kasi and Kam on the floor together unless there was absolutely no other choice. The reserves, IMO, need to only come in to give the first six a blow and the team should try to maintain at least four of the first six on the floor at any given time.
Glad to have this over-hyped game over. It would have been fun to win, but it's a lot more important to address the glaring weaknesses. Maybe it will be more a priority now that the team sees what could be possible with smarter work ethic.