O'Neal or Rogers

[UT IE 95]

Rogers? We need to replace Briscoe first. Briscoe is flat out terrible. Lets get Moore and O'Neil in there for some actin.

Tough actin tanactin.

I agree on Briscoe. Rogers is the least of our worries - the guy is in the top 10 statistically in the SEC.

I really liked seeing Moore on the field, but it seems to have been reduced the last two games. Maybe he'll get in mix more as the season progresses.

At this point, Kenny is viewed as a bust - nothing more nothing less. Hopefully he'll turn it around and show his stuff.

 

[lacrossepro70]

Yea hes definately not slow...

Whatever he lacks in speed, he obviously lacks in size and strength. That speed of his hasn't helped him go deep or break any short passes for 50 yard gains. No he isn't one of the better recievers out there, and don't let people tell you otherwise. BUT in order to run an efficient no huddle you need to minimize substitutions and get players on the field who know the playbook. Apparently, O'Neil has a lot to learn, otherwise he'd be out there.

 

[utvolpj]

I think that it was he couldn't chase down a LB...who had a quick burst to get out in front of him.

oh the LB the grabbed the ball and had a head start in a short race. I now see how he's slow.

 

[hoss44]

How bout Griffith calling Rogers and Briscoe jokers and scrubs yesterday

 

[TennTradition]

oh the LB the grabbed the ball and had a head start in a short race. I now see how he's slow.

yup..the LB had the ball bounce into his hands and didn't have to slow his momentum at all it seemed...