OM v UT 20 Injury Timeouts

#76
#76
OP gave half the infornation and pretended like he gave everything there was needed to know.
Well, talk specifics, cite which specific plays you are talking about and what else you would add so that people can look at it themselves and decide between you who is right. If you will refer to specific plays we can all interact so we can have an adult conversation. The way you are doing it is basically just an ad hominem attack against the OP and your generalizing makes it seem like you can't rebut the OP using the record, otherwise you'd say, "hey you missed this injury at ____:____ in the ___ quarter" or "where you are wrong about the play you mention at ___:___ in the ___quarter is _______." When someone is as specific as OP was it lends them credibility, if you want to effectively rebut him you've got to do the same thing.
 
Last edited:
#77
#77
So, what advantage did OM gain by Corral being ‘injured’? OM could have allowed the play clock to run to :00 and called timeout without Corral having an injury, right? Not sure what the advantage would be.
No you’re not correct. He wasn’t faking an injury in this instance. He clearly got dinged up. If the game has to be stopped to get you off the field, you can’t come right back in, even if there is a timeout. He got dinged up and the officials had to stop the game to get him off the field. The very next play, their backup threw an incomplete pass on 3rd and 10 and Ole Miss had to punt to us. We were having issues stopping their 3rd and longs all game long. Kiffin was clearly trying to sneak him back out their for that play. It worked to our advantage ultimately because the ref was actually doing his job and didn’t allow him to come back into the game.
 

VN Store



Back
Top