unfrozencvmanvol
Nico came, he saw, he conquered.
- Joined
- Jul 3, 2018
- Messages
- 10,642
- Likes
- 19,346
Well, talk specifics, cite which specific plays you are talking about and what else you would add so that people can look at it themselves and decide between you who is right. If you will refer to specific plays we can all interact so we can have an adult conversation. The way you are doing it is basically just an ad hominem attack against the OP and your generalizing makes it seem like you can't rebut the OP using the record, otherwise you'd say, "hey you missed this injury at ____:____ in the ___ quarter" or "where you are wrong about the play you mention at ___:___ in the ___quarter is _______." When someone is as specific as OP was it lends them credibility, if you want to effectively rebut him you've got to do the same thing.OP gave half the infornation and pretended like he gave everything there was needed to know.
Last edited: