LibertyVol
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Nov 26, 2011
- Messages
- 2,678
- Likes
- 3,288
The point I'm making is, I don't care whose offense it is, Hooker made Golesh look like a superstar. Halzle had no Hooker---not that we know of..lol.This is Josh Heupel's offense. I don't get any sort of narrative that the change from Golesh to Halzle has had any sort of negative impact on the offense. I might buy that if it weren't still Josh Heupel's offense. Now, has it evolved? Yes. Do they change things based on their talent? Yes, and you want that. But as far as there being some dropoff just due to that move, I don't buy it. Heupel has had success everywhere.
Yeah, I got your point. Was just wanting to make an overarching comment on the narrative that the offense took a step back explicitly because Golesh left. I just don't believe that had as much an effect as so many other factors.The point I'm making is, I don't care whose offense it is, Hooker made Golesh look like a superstar. Halzle had no Hooker---not that we know of..lol.