Obama says iran has the right to nuke power

#2
#2
as long as he does not bow down to the Saudi King again, I can give him a pass on Iranian nukes. Personally, I am starting to think we should begin selling nukes to the Saudis, Iranians, Syrians and whoever else over in that area wants the things and can pay for them. It would help neutralize the Chinese/Russian threat and give us a massive cash infusion that might help offset the runaway inflation that is about to make beggars out of 99% of the U.S. citizenry.
 
#4
#4
VolunteerHillbilly said:
as long as he does not bow down to the Saudi King again, I can give him a pass on Iranian nukes. Personally, I am starting to think we should begin selling nukes to the Saudis, Iranians, Syrians and whoever else over in that area wants the things and can pay for them. It would help neutralize the Chinese/Russian threat and give us a massive cash infusion that might help offset the runaway inflation that is about to make beggars out of 99% of the U.S. citizenry.
Click to expand...

:no:

Iran sanctions terror as national policy. No way they should get nukes. It is basically the same thing as giving nukes to Hezbollah and Hamas.
 
#5
#5
we should just offer to send them some of our nukes. Of course the delivery system is at our discretion :whistling:
 
#7
#7
President Barack Obama reiterated that Iran may have some right to nuclear energy _ provided it takes steps to prove its aspirations are peaceful.
Click to expand...

What exactly is wrong with that? Of course, I don't think Iran is going to prove a damn thing.
 
#8
#8
emainvol said:
What exactly is wrong with that? Of course, I don't think Iran is going to prove a damn thing.
Click to expand...

Nothing is wrong with that, but the simple fact of the matter is like you said, Iran won't prove a damn thing.
 
#9
#9
It's stupid for us to pretend that the Iranians have no right to anything. They have every right in the world to develop nukes. We have every right to use any form of coercion we like in precluding their getting nukes.
 
#10
#10
BigPapaVol said:
It's stupid for us to pretend that the Iranians have no right to anything. They have every right in the world to develop nukes. We have every right to use any form of coercion we like in precluding their getting nukes.
Click to expand...

100% correct
 
#12
#12
Fine Vol said:
Do you want to play a game?
Click to expand...

saw.jpg
 
#14
#14
joevol320 said:
Obama says Iran's energy concerns legitimate

do we really believe that they'll only use nuke tech for power? this guy is worse than clinton was with china and north Korea. he's either naive and hates jews as much as iran does. what a fool
Click to expand...




This is what George Bush had to say about the subject in an interview last year:

And the Iranian people have got to understand that the United States is going to be firm in our desire to prevent the nation from developing a nuclear weapon, but reasonable in our desire to see to it that you have civilian nuclear power without enabling the government to enrich [uranium]. And the problem is that they have not told the truth in the past, and therefore it's very difficult for the United States and the rest of the world -- or much of the rest of the world -- to trust the Iranian government when it comes to telling the truth.

So I support the Russian proposal to provide Iran with enriched uranium to go into a civilian nuclear-power plant. There's a way forward. In other words, I don't know what the Iranian people believe about the United States, but they must believe that we have proposed a way forward that will yield to peace. And it's their government that is resisting these changes


There is ZERO difference between what Obama and Bush have said about the issue of civilian nuclear power.

But, let the scare machine continue. Bright bold red letters on Drudge, Oh my God Obama is selling us out again.

Frickin morons.
 
#16
#16
lawgator1 said:
This is what George Bush had to say about the subject in an interview last year:

And the Iranian people have got to understand that the United States is going to be firm in our desire to prevent the nation from developing a nuclear weapon, but reasonable in our desire to see to it that you have civilian nuclear power without enabling the government to enrich [uranium]. And the problem is that they have not told the truth in the past, and therefore it's very difficult for the United States and the rest of the world -- or much of the rest of the world -- to trust the Iranian government when it comes to telling the truth.

So I support the Russian proposal to provide Iran with enriched uranium to go into a civilian nuclear-power plant. There's a way forward. In other words, I don't know what the Iranian people believe about the United States, but they must believe that we have proposed a way forward that will yield to peace. And it's their government that is resisting these changes


There is ZERO difference between what Obama and Bush have said about the issue of civilian nuclear power.

But, let the scare machine continue. Bright bold red letters on Drudge, Oh my God Obama is selling us out again.

Frickin morons.
Click to expand...

kinda like ur scare tactic this morning about that guy who killed the abortion doc being linked to conservatives. u obviously have no idea what a conservative is
 
#18
#18
lawgator1 said:
There is ZERO difference between what Obama and Bush have said about the issue of civilian nuclear power.
.
Click to expand...
Given where the two fall in the spectrum of hawk to dove, this statement is borderline Joevol worthy.
 
#19
#19
lawgator1 said:
This is what George Bush had to say about the subject in an interview last year:

And the Iranian people have got to understand that the United States is going to be firm in our desire to prevent the nation from developing a nuclear weapon, but reasonable in our desire to see to it that you have civilian nuclear power without enabling the government to enrich [uranium]. And the problem is that they have not told the truth in the past, and therefore it's very difficult for the United States and the rest of the world -- or much of the rest of the world -- to trust the Iranian government when it comes to telling the truth.

So I support the Russian proposal to provide Iran with enriched uranium to go into a civilian nuclear-power plant. There's a way forward. In other words, I don't know what the Iranian people believe about the United States, but they must believe that we have proposed a way forward that will yield to peace. And it's their government that is resisting these changes


There is ZERO difference between what Obama and Bush have said about the issue of civilian nuclear power.

But, let the scare machine continue. Bright bold red letters on Drudge, Oh my God Obama is selling us out again.

Frickin morons.
Click to expand...

I could do that same side-by-side comparison on many issues, yet supposedly Bush was so terrible and Obama is so great. Which is it? Are they similar on a lot of policies, or are they not?
 
#20
#20
lawgator1 said:
This is what George Bush had to say about the subject in an interview last year:

And the Iranian people have got to understand that the United States is going to be firm in our desire to prevent the nation from developing a nuclear weapon, but reasonable in our desire to see to it that you have civilian nuclear power without enabling the government to enrich [uranium]. And the problem is that they have not told the truth in the past, and therefore it's very difficult for the United States and the rest of the world -- or much of the rest of the world -- to trust the Iranian government when it comes to telling the truth.

So I support the Russian proposal to provide Iran with enriched uranium to go into a civilian nuclear-power plant. There's a way forward. In other words, I don't know what the Iranian people believe about the United States, but they must believe that we have proposed a way forward that will yield to peace. And it's their government that is resisting these changes


There is ZERO difference between what Obama and Bush have said about the issue of civilian nuclear power.

But, let the scare machine continue. Bright bold red letters on Drudge, Oh my God Obama is selling us out again.

Frickin morons.
Click to expand...

the difference is that bush had the balls to stop iran from getting nukes.

thank goodness that Israel has a strong leader now. maybe they'll do it. Frickin moron.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
#22
#22
Fine Vol said:
go law go law
Click to expand...


Its just so frustrating to have these people who have the arrogance to say that they are the real media in fact be so absolutely full of sh*t at every turn.

They intentionally make it seem as though Obama has announced some new dramatic shift in American foreign policy just so that they can manufacture more fear that Obama is either weak or outright screwing us.

In reality, his foreign policy has, other than rhetoric, pretty fairly matched up with Bush's. You can make an argument that he has made moves to downsize Iraq, but only to re-focus on Afghanistan. The whole Gitmo thing is still up in the air.

But other than shaking some people's hands and pledging to work together in the inernatinal community, he hasn't made any significant changes in American foreign policy from the Bush era.

Yet he is being falsely portrayed as a namby pamby naive do-gooder who is going to get us all blown to smithereens. Such a lie.
 
#23
#23
joevol320 said:
the difference is that bush had the balls to stop iran from getting nukes. your sheppard hussein is a pussy, he will not do jack to stop them.

thank goodness that Israel has a strong leader now. maybe they'll do it. Frickin moron.
Click to expand...


Did Bush bomb Iran and I missed it?
 
#24
#24
lawgator1 said:
Did Bush bomb Iran and I missed it?
Click to expand...

he would have had the balls to give tougher restrictions than 'the muslim' would have. you don't want to see that hussein is going to cower to mideast and they're terrorist friends, even more than Bush did. that's why he's trying pressure Israel so much. thank goodness the Israwl prime minister is the opposite to that marxist we have in office.
 
#25
#25
lawgator1 said:
Its just so frustrating to have these people who have the arrogance to say that they are the real media in fact be so absolutely full of sh*t at every turn.

They intentionally make it seem as though Obama has announced some new dramatic shift in American foreign policy just so that they can manufacture more fear that Obama is either weak or outright screwing us.

In reality, his foreign policy has, other than rhetoric, pretty fairly matched up with Bush's. You can make an argument that he has made moves to downsize Iraq, but only to re-focus on Afghanistan. The whole Gitmo thing is still up in the air.

But other than shaking some people's hands and pledging to work together in the inernatinal community, he hasn't made any significant changes in American foreign policy from the Bush era.

Yet he is being falsely portrayed as a namby pamby naive do-gooder who is going to get us all blown to smithereens. Such a lie.
Click to expand...

he's is anamby pamby naive, but not a do gooder, he's a cold liberal who hates America and Israel. don't worry law, he'll take good care of his fellow lawyers.
 
New posts
You must log in or register to reply here.

VN Store



Back
Top