volball625
Sophmore Member
- Joined
- Jan 10, 2007
- Messages
- 8,152
- Likes
- 44
Haha ridiculous.
My 10 year old sister is competent in CoD. It's ridiculously easy to play, and, like I said, is a game of whoever sees the other first.
Im not much of a video game guy, (love NCAAF tho) but bout every weekend or so Ill play it for hours with my friends. Theres a lot of "OMG are you serious I shot that guy 5ox than meleed him and..." at least for me. Where you hit the guy in the back of the head and it kills him, yet a grenade and 1,000 rounds wont do the trick. But Ill play it til the cows come home and I dont know why. I am a bigger fan of no shield game settings where its not all that crap of what you have to do to kill the guy.
I gues its because its a great game to play with a bunch of people. And teams is great.
Worst part of Halo 3 is all the accesories. I hate bubble shields. Replays are awesome.
The Button layout is better in CoD, and I also like having every weapon at your disposal before you re-enter. Rather than everyone having a BR and fighting for the one rocket or sniper on the level, and then once a good sniper gets ahold of it then it's game over.....If theres a good sniper and he is destroying our team in CoD I can get a sniper myself and counter it. I think CoD takes a lot more skill as it took me like 4 weeks right after Halo came out to get bored of being too good, and sniping the **** out of people....I Still am not on that level of CoD and it's been half a year.
what exactly do you expect? call of duty is a simulator of realistic warfare. it's not like all the soldiers are wearing super high tech energy shields that can take a million bullets like those in halo. jeez......
What do I expect? Entertainment. In which, there's not nearly as much when skills aren't required.
Since when is realistic warfare better? I mean, Mario threw fireballs, and Sonic rolled up in a ball and barreled through fiends. Who's to say they weren't great games?
Since when is realistic warfare better?
