Bert Rechichar
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Oct 4, 2015
- Messages
- 186
- Likes
- 487
Those days you could only watch 3 or 4 games per year on TV and those were on little 25 inch squares. Tickets were cheap, salaries were practically nothing and people had nothing else to do on a weekend. Obesity was considered a bad thing. Times have changed.
If I'm going to a game. I don't want to be getting cooked, squeezed between thirteen 250 plus pounders on a row so that my seat area is down to 5 inches across, high priced concessions, listening to some rude drunk scream at another rude drunk, no back on my seat, etc. Yeah, I'll stay home, and enjoy most games in comfort.
You do know that these renovations aren't doing anything about the complaints you mentioned above, at all? The seats will still be 9 inches wide on a bleacher, unless you have a season ticket on the blue hair west sideline near the field. The only difference is there will only be 92,000 9 inch sets instead of what we have now.
Hi
But you got time to comment and speak as if I didn't know I was in a thread about stadium renovations.
Did the university change the way they reference capacity? Before we were at 102455 we didn’t seem to have a set ‘capacity’. It seemed like we got two numbers, one that seemed to indicate actual seating or tickets sold and then the total number that seemed to include everyone there. I’m talking about all the attendance records we set when we generally would hear a number like 109071 that was easily understood as everyone present and not just seats, which I believe was around 104000.
I guess what I am asking is why doesn’t the University tell us what the actual seating capacity is? Are they paranoid that the fan base’s self-esteem will take a hit if it was known Neyland doesn’t actually have 100000 seats?
Whatever the math works out to is irrelevant. I was a season ticket holder when the admin shrunk the seat size. It was all about numbers then and now we’re hearing it’s not. If the UTAD is ok with lowering capacity then they should accommodate more butt room on the bleachers. The Jumbotron is unneeded and likely unwanted by many fans. I do t trust their research one bit. As a family who has been holding season tickets for over half a century they’ve not ONCE asked what we thought.
Sometimes we have to use actual facts, real numbers, for example if for 10 years we averaged only 15000 empty seats/game (it is actually higher) and had only 8 games at Neyland/year (this year will be 9) that would be 120,000 tickets-if you use the very low $60/ticket (it is closer to $70) AVERAGE price, the is 72million dollars ($72,000,000) in lost revenue. If we use the more accurate number of 25,000/game, and $69/ticket (average) and 8 games/season we see 10x8x25,000x69=128 Million dollars ($128,000,000) in lost revenue.Because the team has sucked for 10yrs. Empty seats at TN is not because of TV's, it is the product on the fielf. This fanbase still puts a ton of butts in seats even after the past 10yrs. Win big again and it will go back to weekly sellouts.
This. If you can't fit into one space and you're not going to stop downing pizza, hot dogs, Twinkies, and soft drinks while never exercising, buy 2 tickets.
Sometimes we have to use actual facts, real numbers, for example if for 10 years we averaged only 15000 empty seats/game (it is actually higher) and had only 8 games at Neyland/year (this year will be 9) that would be 120,000 tickets-if you use the very low $60/ticket (it is closer to $70) AVERAGE price, the is 72million dollars ($72,000,000) in lost revenue. If we use the more accurate number of 25,000/game, and $69/ticket (average) and 8 games/season we see 10x8x25,000x69=128 Million dollars ($128,000,000) in lost revenue.
If we gave up 15,000 seats (remember seating and capacity are not the same number) but had a sell out, we would be picking up 10,000 tickets/game. At $69/ticket (average)=$690,000/game, on an eight game (home games) season, 5,520,000 in increased revenue. Empty seats are expensive, they still need to be maintained etc.. Now- offsets from concerts (if they sell out those unused seats from football games) or other uses may change the revenue stream forecasts (I don't have any of those numbers). The fact remains, reducing seating cap, improve the seats, and the other improvements, if this resulted in near sell outs-every game, would be a big boost to the program.
My numbers are neither arbitrary, nor are they made up. You clearly do not understand English very well, I guess you are a transplant from Iran-but the term Average has escaped your attention, most likely due to the fact English is your second language, please take a moment to look it up. I'm impressed you can speak English at all-God Bless you. Your assertion that I stated anything about 25,000 seats-every game is laughable … laughable, hahahahaha, you are a funnnneeee little fella. In Fact, anyone that reads and understands English, could count the number of times I used the word, AVERAGE. In fact, I capitalized the word in line two, and had already used it in line one!!! In one of your earlier posts, where you stated, "I've been bringing in a flask of Jack Daniels, to every home game, for over 10 years...." shows what kind of person you are. I didn't think Iranians drank liquor-but that is your business.Lol. Your "real" numbers imply that reducing the numbers increases sales but you have no "real" numbers besides your arbitrary, made-up estimates to validate your claims and assumptions that these "improvements" are what will attract butts to the seats. The fact that the product on the field has been shat seems to be lost on you. But you're clearly a mid-level management type of guy who likes to use arbitrary numbers for your TPS reports but don't understand the bigger picture. Good thing you're not making the final decisions on The Hill.
And to argue that we have had 25,000 empty seats every home game for 10yrs is laughable...laughable.
This fanbase is hungry for a winner. The amount of people in the stands that continue to show-up after the past 10yrs while other schools in the top 25 can't sellout proves it. People will come. People want TN to win. I went to almost every home game for 17yrs but after the continued clown show refused to support the TN AD and their idiocy. With Fulmer on the Hill and a competent coach I will rethink my financial support in 2020 and am confident others will too. Win some football games, put a top 15-20 team on the field and enjoy a packed Neyland for 8 weekends a year. Then get our idiot Mayor to drop their entertainment tax, or whatever they want to call it, and use Neyland and TBA for concerts more often to generate additional revenues.
It's not rocket science kid.
I hate what they've done to us.Well that's one way to solve declining attendance I guess. I would have preferred winning games but ... *shrug*
I remember when it seemed like the goal was to have the biggest and the best at everything. Feels like those days get further and further behind us with each passing year. If they drop Neyland to 92,000 we'll be smaller than LSU, Georgia, Alabama, and Texas A&M in conference, and out of conference Michigan, Ohio State, Texas, and Penn State. Plus anyone else who is still on the tail end of expanding. I hate having a smaller stadium than the Bammers. Never cared about having more screens. Cared about having a towering mass of screaming Vols bearing down on people. Cared about being on equal footing with the other big names in the sport. Someone will happily tell me it's all about amenities and club seats and special access and all that; always seems to come down to that stuff now.