NCAA's Emmert in favor of "payout" to athletes

#6
#6
The $$$$$$$$$ that schools make off thier time I think it's fair. It might put clean Dooley a little more level. cause ask Scam Newton schools pay.
 
#7
#7
Only a slight improvement over the indentured servitude that currently serves as the ncaa model.
 
#12
#12
BigPapaVol said:
How is a hard number slippery?
Posted via VolNation Mobile
Click to expand...

Because who gets to decide the number? Is the football team, who generates multpile millions upon millions for the school going to be ok with the women's volleyball team getting the same $ for generating nothing for the school? Besides, it's completely arbitrary and does nothing to solve the issue of agents and athletes getting paid
 
#13
#13
fade route said:
Because who gets to decide the number? Is the football team, who generates multpile millions upon millions for the school going to be ok with the women's volleyball team getting the same $ for generating nothing for the school? Besides, it's completely arbitrary and does nothing to solve the issue of agents and athletes getting paid
Click to expand...

Who in the world do you think decides the number?

And yes, walking around money does address the issue.
Posted via VolNation Mobile
 
#14
#14
BigPapaVol said:
Who in the world do you think decides the number?

And yes, walking around money does address the issue.
Posted via VolNation Mobile
Click to expand...

To your first point, if it's the same number for all schools, all conferences, doesn't that give some schools and conferences a competitive edge? By that I mean, $2000 will go alot further in Tuscaloosa than it will in Palo Alto, CA, so Bama athlestes will in essence have more to spend because cost of food, apartment, etc is cheaper

To your second point - you have to be kidding
 
#17
#17
fade route said:
To your first point, if it's the same number for all schools, all conferences, doesn't that give some schools and conferences a competitive edge? By that I mean, $2000 will go alot further in Tuscaloosa than it will in Palo Alto, CA, so Bama athlestes will in essence have more to spend because cost of food, apartment, etc is cheaper

To your second point - you have to be kidding
Click to expand...
If they want index the number to a federal cost of living index, so be it.

Much of the issue about money from agents really is about having none. It won't address everything, but will relieve some pressure.
Posted via VolNation Mobile
 
#19
#19
BigPapaVol said:
]If they want index the number to a federal cost of living index, so be it.[/B]

Much of the issue about money from agents really is about having none. It won't address everything, but will relieve some pressure.
Posted via VolNation Mobile
Click to expand...

Maybe, but I'm still skeptical
 
#20
#20
jessee james said:
The $$$$$$$$$ that schools make off thier time I think it's fair. It might put clean Dooley a little more level. cause ask Scam Newton schools pay.
Click to expand...

They payment would have to come from the NCAA. Only 10-15 athletic departments make money. But I do like the idea.

Really, they should be cutting coaches pay and giving it to the athletes.
 
#21
#21
BigPapaVol said:
Nobody is saying it's a panacea, but it will stop some.
Posted via VolNation Mobile
Click to expand...

very little, did you see the amount of money the Miami football players were getting? my guess thats closer to the norm than what we think for most major programs.
 
#25
#25
I wonder how many infractions have come from players taking a few bucks here and there on the side to get by. Quite a large percentage, I'd imagine.

No, it wouldn't stop the Terrelle Pryor and Cam Newton situations, but it would help quite a bit.
 
New posts
You must log in or register to reply here.
Advertisement



Back
Top