Rodman was a top 10 player?
Nice analysis. Must be why Chamberlain's teams killed everyone.All time? No. League-wide in his prime? Yes.
16 rpg from one player is like playing 6 on 5. If your other players can just rebound a little bit you will dominate ball possession.
The Bulls added Rodman to a team that lost in the Eastern Semi-Finals and they won 70 games, and smoked everybody in the playoffs (16-3).
Nice analysis. Must be why Chamberlain's teams killed everyone.
I don't know how old you might be, but if you watched, he wasn't one of the top 4 or 5 players on his title teams, much less in the league.
Posted via VolNation Mobile
Nice analysis. Must be why Chamberlain's teams killed everyone.
I don't know how old you might be, but if you watched, he wasn't one of the top 4 or 5 players on his title teams, much less in the league.
Posted via VolNation Mobile
The problem I'm seeing with this list is the probable result of the fact that there has yet to be a good stat to track defense.
Since I like to use Trail Blazers for examples of everything, this ranking saying there are 47 guys in the league better than Gerald Wallace is evidence of this IMO.
But that's too high IMO... He's a great defender and all, but I still don't buy that there is any good statistical measurement of overall defensive ability. There are great ways to measure certain aspects of defense, but there is so much that goes into that end of the game that there is no statistical measure of.
I like the spreesheet with Love sitting at the top spot, the last line has wins produced...25 wins...the Timberwolves wish they could win 25 games.