My Thoughs on the Syracuse Game, After Sleeping on it

#1

NighthawkVol

Well-Known Member
Joined
Apr 7, 2007
Messages
14,966
Likes
53,183
#1
I went down to Atlanta with some friends and we had a great time. I know a lot of our fans hate the neutral site games, but I've always enjoyed them. It's a chance to have fun in another city, interact with another fan base, and make a fun trip out of it. It's kind of akin to a bowl atmosphere. While this one was fun, it lacked a lot of the umph of some past neutral site trips. A) The Syracuse fan base didn't show up. At all. The announced attendance was 46,000 and Vol fans were at least 40,000 of those. B) The noon kickoff sucks. There isn't time to do anything. I would have loved to have visited the College Football Hall of Fame, but that was impossible with that kickoff time. The Charlotte trip last year was much better.

On to the game:

1) Obviously, we have to feel good about Aguilar and the offense coming out of that, while being a little concerned about the defense. Basically, the opposite of what we expected. I thought the substitution patterns on defense were a little odd, but maybe they're just testing personnel combos early in the season. Why was Ben Bolton the 4th LB? Where was Jordan Burns? Hurt? Harmon and Anes also played. Bolton and Anes were liabilities. Harmon missed a run fit to give up a chunk run, but later settled in and made some plays. It seemed like our defense gave up plays and scores when 3 things happened: 1) our backups were in, either due to injuries or the weird substitutions; 2) we gave up 4th down conversions (and long ones at that); 3) we played zone coverage. The zone coverage has to be better. We're really good in man. I'd like to see us play less zone, but you can't play 100% man.

2) Aguilar was really good, while also having plenty of things he can improve on. That's a great position to be in. He seemed to fix the high throw issues as the game went on. Something I'll mention...folks forget that Hooker had a tendency to sail throws high at times in 2021 and early 2022 because he ended up having such a great year. But it was a slight issue. It was fixed, obviously. Something about JA reminds me of HH. Similar runners. Their ball looks similar. Both can extend plays and keep their head about them. Both are leaders. I think we're really going to enjoy our season with Joey.

3) The oline looked good, especially with Sanders out. There was 1 snap issue and we were lucky not to lose the ball there. Perry whiffed on a pulling play on the goal line, but Lewis trucked the guy anyway. Otherwise, they played well. Aguilar had a clean pocket. There were plenty of running lanes. Sham will give us good depth when Sanders returns because I thought he looked good. I'd like to see one more Olineman develop into a good depth piece as the year goes on because being 7-8 deep is ideal. Bennett Warren would be the best candidate.

4) Jalen McMurray might've been the best player on the field. Boo Carter better get it in gear because JM played like a star Saturday. He sticks his nose in there and hits, in spite of being undersized (he reminded me a little of JJ McCleskey, and not just because of the #6). He was great in coverage, great rushing the QB on blitzes (caused the Telander INT), and was just an all around menace. Conversely, Boo missed a huge tackle on the QB that led to a score. Our CB situation, assuming none of the injuries are serious, is as good as its been in forever. McCoy and Gibson will likely be early draft entrees, but Hood and Redmond are future stars. I couldn't have been more impressed with Redmond in his first game. That kid just LOOKS like a future NFL high round pick. We're really good in the 2-deep at all 3 CB positions. As for Safety, Turrentine is solid, but not spectacular. He still tends to have a play or two where I wonder what he's doing. Farooq looked good to me. But we don't have the depth at Safety that we have at CB. Can't afford an injury there. Beasley didn't play well, IMO. And where was Sidney Walton? I thought he'd be the 4th CB. It was also strange that Wright got in at CB before Goree or one of the freshmen. But I guess this staff has never had a problem playing former walk-ons over recruited guys.

5) Yes, the WRs had some drops, but I actually liked what I saw from them. Staley was as good as we could have hoped. He's fast, he ran good routes, got separation, caught the ball, and showed he can do something with it. Matthews only had 2 catches, but he's quick. On his 2nd catch, he made two moves to make guys miss. He and Brazzell need to fix the drops, but they should. Game 1 usually sees WR drops (see Jeremiah Smith dropping bis 1st 2 targets Saturday). In fact, I think the glitches in the passing game (high throws, drops) will get ironed out more as these WRs get more acclimated to JA and vice-versa. Sometimes a high throw is a timing thing because the QB expected a deeper route or the WR expected the opposite. And a drop can also be a product of timing/discomfort. We saw less "glitches" as the game went on. I expect the same of the season.

6) How about these RBs? I did not expect that from Star Thomas. He doesn't look like the RB whose Duke film I watched when he signed. He's decisive. He's powerful. He runs possessed. I think he's our best RB and that's not a knock on Bishop or Lewis...both looked good. Lewis looks like a different RB. He's not dancing in the hole anymore. He's going to break some long runs this year. Bishop ran hard and sets up blocks well. It was good to FINALLY see the RBs catching passes too. Speaking of that...

7) The offensive creativity was nice to see. We ran some pistol sets. We ran more compact formations without the wide splits. We did different things out of 12 personnel than we have in the past (like the PA bomb to Staley with 2 TEs in the backfield). We threw to the RBs. Some of the route combos look new. It was refreshing. I think having a veteran/heady QB is making this possible.

8) Obviously, JA hitting the deep ball was something UT fans were all glad to see after the overthrows of the last 2 years. That was simply a gorgeous throw. He could have had another one to Matthews, but he underthrew it slightly, forcing Matthews to slow down and giving the DB a chance to catch up. But even on his missed deep balls, at least they weren't overthrown. He gave his WR a chance and also left open the possibility of PI (which was this case on the other one). This is why it's better to underthrow than to overthrow.

9) Some other positive developments: 1) Nathan Robinson. No one talked about him preseason. He looked really good. 2) Colton Hood. He looks like a star. When McCoy comes back, what do you do with him? Good problem to have. 3) Lance Heard. He's a different player. 4) Miles Kitselman: 2 catches, a TD and a one handed by the goal line. 5) I thought Tyree Weathersby and Jamal Wallace looked good. Not great, but good. Both will contribute. 6) Arion Carter is a stud and Edwin Spillman is that dude. He's a better LB than Telander, but the coaches seem to love JT. I'm not saying JT is bad, but man, Carter and Spillman together are so athletic. Best LB combo in a long time.

10) Some concerns: 1) The injuries. I hope none are serious. We can't be getting into our depth pieces this early in the season. Moi needs to be okay. If not, Dom Bailey may move inside for good, not just rabbits or situational (with West and Weathersby available at SDE, we have the luxury there). And we may need to rush Utley's and Campbell's development. 2) I wasn't impressed with Caleb Herring. He kept crashing the end and giving up the edge, allowing chunk runs. And he got no pass rush. Jordan Ross looked a lot better and should be the #2 LEO after Saturday. Hopefully, Herring just had a bad game. 3) Where was Ethan Davis? I did notice his blocking has improved, but why isn't he being targeted? Maybe this is something we'll see in bigger games? 4) Still too many penalties. 7 for 65 yards. A lot of sloppiness, especially after we got a big lead.

11) Why did the NCAA impose a new fake injury rule, then avoid enforcing it? This crap has to stop. It's not just about the integrity of the game, it's about watchability. We're letting college football turn into soccer. It slows the game to a crawl. We'll be in the middle of an exciting drive, then boom. Fake injury. Commercial. It's awful.

It'll be interesting to see who plays and in what order against ETSU. Will Jordan Burns play? Will Goree? What about the freshman DBs like Walton, Poteat, Merritt, and Lewis? I'd like to see the young Olinemen (Warren, Ginther, Anderson, Satterwhite) and DTs (Campbell, Utley, Dye) get in early. Will any of the guys who were injured Saturday play or do they just hold them out? I look forward to seeing the personnel decisions in that game.

Anyway, fun start to the season. With Alabama losing to Florida State (and their Ty Simpson-led offense looking like garbage), the "9-3 is the median" prognostications are edging closer to 10-2.
 
Last edited:
#2
#2
I went down to Atlanta with some friends and we had a great time. I know a lot of our fans hate the neutral site games, but I've always enjoyed them. It's a chance to have fun in another city, interact with another fan base, and make a fun trip out of it. It's kind of akin to a bowl atmosphere. While this one was fun, it lacked a lot of the umph of some past neutral site trips. A) The Syracuse fan base didn't show up. At all. The announced attendance was 46,000 and Vol fans were at least 40,000 of those. B) The noon kickoff sucks. There isn't time to do anything. I would have loved to have visited the College Football Hall of Fame, but that was impossible with that kickoff time. The Charlotte trip last year was much better.

On to the game:

1) Obviously, we have to feel good about Aguilar and the offense coming out of that, while being a little concerned about the defense. Basically, the opposite of what we expected. I thought the substitution patterns on defense were a little odd, but maybe they're just testing personnel combos early in the season. Why was Ben Bolton the 4th LB? Where was Jordan Burns? Hurt? Harmon and Anes also played. Bolton and Anes were liabilities. Harmon missed a run fit to give up a chunk run, but later settled in and made some plays. It seemed like our defense gave up plays and scores when 3 things happened: 1) our backups were in, either due to injuries or the weird substitutions; 2) we gave up 4th down conversions (and long ones at that); 3) we played zone coverage. The zone coverage has to be better. We're really good in man. I'd like to see us play less zone, but you can't play 100% man.

2) Aguilar was really good, while also having plenty of things he can improve on. That's a great position to be in. He seemed to fix the high throw issues as the game went on. Something I'll mention...folks forget that Hooker had a tendency to sail throws high at times in 2021 and early 2022 because he ended up having such a great year. But it was a slight issue. It was fixed, obviously. Something about JA reminds me of HH. Similar runners. Their ball looks similar. Both can extend plays and keep their head about them. Both are leaders. I think we're really going to enjoy our season with Joey.

3) The oline looked good, especially with Sanders out. There was 1 snap issue and we were lucky not to lose the ball there. Perry whiffed on a pulling play on the goal line, but Lewis trucked the guy anyway. Otherwise, they played well. Aguilar had a clean pocket. There were plenty of running lanes. Sham will give us good depth when Sanders returns because I thought he looked good. I'd like to see one more Olineman develop into a good depth piece as the year goes on because being 7-8 deep is ideal. Bennett Warren would be the best candidate.

4) Jalen McMurray might've been the best player on the field. Boo Carter better get it in gear because JM played like a star Saturday. He sticks his nose in there and hits, in spite of being undersized (he reminded me a little of JJ McCleskey, and not just because of the #6). He was great in coverage, great rushing the QB on blitzes (caused the Telander INT), and was just an all around menace. Conversely, Boo missed a huge tackle on the QB that led to a score. Our CB situation, assuming none of the injuries are serious, is as good as its been in forever. McCoy and Gibson will likely be early draft entrees, but Hood and Redmond are future stars. I couldn't have been more impressed with Redmond in his first game. That kid just LOOKS like a future NFL high round pick. We're really good in the 2-deep at all 3 CB positions. As for Safety, Turrentine is solid, but not spectacular. He still tends to have a play or two where I wonder what he's doing. Farooq looked good to me. But we don't have the depth at Safety that we have at LB. Beasley didn't play well, IMO. And where was Sidney Walton? I thought he'd be the 4th CB. It was also strange that Wright got in at CB before Goree or one of the freshmen. But I guess this staff has never had a problem playing former walk-ons over recruited guys.

5) Yes, the WRs had some drops, but I actually liked what I saw from them. Staley was as good as we could have hoped. He's fast, he ran good routes, got separation, caught the ball, and showed he can do something with it. Matthews only had 2 catches, but he's quick. On his 2nd catch, he made two moves to make guys miss. He and Brazzell need to fix the drops, but they should. Game 1 usually sees WR drops (see Jeremiah Smith dropping bis 1st 2 targets Saturday). In fact, I think the glitches in the passing game (high throws, drops) will get ironed out more as these WRs get more acclimated to JA and vice-versa. Sometimes a high throw is a timing thing because the QB expected a deeper route or the WR expected the opposite. And a drop can also be a product of timing/discomfort. We saw less "glitches" as the game went on. I expect the same of the season.

6) How about these RBs? I did not expect that from Star Thomas. He doesn't look like the RB whose Duke film I watched when he signed. He's decisive. He's powerful. He runs possessed. I think he's our best RB and that's not a knock on Bishop or Lewis...both looked good. Lewis looks like a different RB. He's not dancing in the hole anymore. He's going to break some long runs this year. Bishop ran hard and sets up blocks well. It was good to FINALLY see the RBs catching passes too. Speaking of that...

7) The offensive creativity was nice to see. We ran some pistol sets. We ran more compact formations without the wide splits. We did different things out of 12 personnel than we have in the past (like the PA bomb to Staley with 2 TEs in the backfield). We threw to the RBs. Some of the route combos look new. It was refreshing. I think having a veteran/heady QB is making this possible.

8) Obviously, JA hitting the deep ball was something UT fans were all glad to see after the overthrows of the last 2 years. That was simply a gorgeous throw. He could have had another one to Matthews, but he underthrew it slightly, forcing Matthews to slow down and giving the DB a chance to catch up. But even on his missed deep balls, at least they weren't overthrown. He gave his WR a chance and also left open the possibility of PI (which was this case on the other one). This is why it's better to underthrow than to overthrow.

9) Some other positive developments: 1) Nathan Robinson. No one talked about him preseason. He looked really good. 2) Colton Hood. He looks like a star. When McCoy comes back, what do you do with him? Good problem to have. 3) Lance Heard. He's a different player. 4) Miles Kitselman: 2 catches, a TD and a one handed by the goal line. 5) I thought Tyree Weathersby and Jamal Wallace looked good. Not great, but good. Both will contribute. 6) Arion Carter is a stud and Edwin Spillman is that dude. He's a better LB than Telander, but the coaches seem to love JT. I'm not saying JT is bad, but man, Carter and Spillman together are so athletic. Best LB combo in a long time.

10) Some concerns: 1) The injuries. I hope none are serious. We can't be getting into our depth pieces this early in the season. Moi needs to be okay. If not, Dom Bailey may move inside for good, not just rabbits or situational (with West and Weathersby available at SDE, we have the luxury there). And we may need to rush Utley's and Campbell's development. 2) I wasn't impressed with Caleb Herring. He kept crashing the end and giving up the edge, allowing chunk runs. And he got no pass rush. Jordan Ross looked a lot better and should be the #2 LEO after Saturday. Hopefully, Herring just had a bad game. 3) Where was Ethan Davis? I did notice his blocking has improved, but why isn't he being targeted? Maybe this is something we'll see in bigger games? 4) Still too many penalties. 7 for 65 yards. A lot of sloppiness, especially after we got a big lead.

11) Why did the NCAA impose a new fake injury rule, then avoid enforcing it? This crap has to stop. It's not just about the integrity of the game, it's about watchability. We're letting college football turn into soccer. It slows the game to a crawl. We'll be in the middle of an exciting drive, then boom. Fake injury. Commercial. It's awful.

It'll be interesting to see who plays and in what order against ETSU. Will Jordan Burns play? Will Goree? What about the freshman DBs like Walton, Poteat, Merritt, and Lewis? I'd like to see the young Olinemen (Warren, Ginther, Anderson, Satterwhite) and DTs (Campbell, Utley, Dye) get in early. Will any of the guys who were injured Saturday play or do they just hold them out? I look forward to seeing the personnel decisions in that game.

Anyway, fun start to the season. With Alabama losing to Florida State (and their Ty Simpson-led offense looking like garbage), the "9-3 is the median" prognostications are edging closer to 10-2.
Well done. Although I get your point about neutral site games, I personally hate them. College games belong on college campuses with the pageantry, tail gates, home crowds, etc. Soulless NFL stadiums are stale and boring for college matchups IMHO. Heck. I live in ATL and didn’t go to the game. I was pleasantly surprised by the talent on the field on Sat. I hope Syracuse is as solid as I think they are on offense, and a little better on defense.
 
#3
#3
I went down to Atlanta with some friends and we had a great time. I know a lot of our fans hate the neutral site games, but I've always enjoyed them. It's a chance to have fun in another city, interact with another fan base, and make a fun trip out of it. It's kind of akin to a bowl atmosphere. While this one was fun, it lacked a lot of the umph of some past neutral site trips. A) The Syracuse fan base didn't show up. At all. The announced attendance was 46,000 and Vol fans were at least 40,000 of those. B) The noon kickoff sucks. There isn't time to do anything. I would have loved to have visited the College Football Hall of Fame, but that was impossible with that kickoff time. The Charlotte trip last year was much better.

On to the game:

1) Obviously, we have to feel good about Aguilar and the offense coming out of that, while being a little concerned about the defense. Basically, the opposite of what we expected. I thought the substitution patterns on defense were a little odd, but maybe they're just testing personnel combos early in the season. Why was Ben Bolton the 4th LB? Where was Jordan Burns? Hurt? Harmon and Anes also played. Bolton and Anes were liabilities. Harmon missed a run fit to give up a chunk run, but later settled in and made some plays. It seemed like our defense gave up plays and scores when 3 things happened: 1) our backups were in, either due to injuries or the weird substitutions; 2) we gave up 4th down conversions (and long ones at that); 3) we played zone coverage. The zone coverage has to be better. We're really good in man. I'd like to see us play less zone, but you can't play 100% man.

2) Aguilar was really good, while also having plenty of things he can improve on. That's a great position to be in. He seemed to fix the high throw issues as the game went on. Something I'll mention...folks forget that Hooker had a tendency to sail throws high at times in 2021 and early 2022 because he ended up having such a great year. But it was a slight issue. It was fixed, obviously. Something about JA reminds me of HH. Similar runners. Their ball looks similar. Both can extend plays and keep their head about them. Both are leaders. I think we're really going to enjoy our season with Joey.

3) The oline looked good, especially with Sanders out. There was 1 snap issue and we were lucky not to lose the ball there. Perry whiffed on a pulling play on the goal line, but Lewis trucked the guy anyway. Otherwise, they played well. Aguilar had a clean pocket. There were plenty of running lanes. Sham will give us good depth when Sanders returns because I thought he looked good. I'd like to see one more Olineman develop into a good depth piece as the year goes on because being 7-8 deep is ideal. Bennett Warren would be the best candidate.

4) Jalen McMurray might've been the best player on the field. Boo Carter better get it in gear because JM played like a star Saturday. He sticks his nose in there and hits, in spite of being undersized (he reminded me a little of JJ McCleskey, and not just because of the #6). He was great in coverage, great rushing the QB on blitzes (caused the Telander INT), and was just an all around menace. Conversely, Boo missed a huge tackle on the QB that led to a score. Our CB situation, assuming none of the injuries are serious, is as good as its been in forever. McCoy and Gibson will likely be early draft entrees, but Hood and Redmond are future stars. I couldn't have been more impressed with Redmond in his first game. That kid just LOOKS like a future NFL high round pick. We're really good in the 2-deep at all 3 CB positions. As for Safety, Turrentine is solid, but not spectacular. He still tends to have a play or two where I wonder what he's doing. Farooq looked good to me. But we don't have the depth at Safety that we have at LB. Beasley didn't play well, IMO. And where was Sidney Walton? I thought he'd be the 4th CB. It was also strange that Wright got in at CB before Goree or one of the freshmen. But I guess this staff has never had a problem playing former walk-ons over recruited guys.

5) Yes, the WRs had some drops, but I actually liked what I saw from them. Staley was as good as we could have hoped. He's fast, he ran good routes, got separation, caught the ball, and showed he can do something with it. Matthews only had 2 catches, but he's quick. On his 2nd catch, he made two moves to make guys miss. He and Brazzell need to fix the drops, but they should. Game 1 usually sees WR drops (see Jeremiah Smith dropping bis 1st 2 targets Saturday). In fact, I think the glitches in the passing game (high throws, drops) will get ironed out more as these WRs get more acclimated to JA and vice-versa. Sometimes a high throw is a timing thing because the QB expected a deeper route or the WR expected the opposite. And a drop can also be a product of timing/discomfort. We saw less "glitches" as the game went on. I expect the same of the season.

6) How about these RBs? I did not expect that from Star Thomas. He doesn't look like the RB whose Duke film I watched when he signed. He's decisive. He's powerful. He runs possessed. I think he's our best RB and that's not a knock on Bishop or Lewis...both looked good. Lewis looks like a different RB. He's not dancing in the hole anymore. He's going to break some long runs this year. Bishop ran hard and sets up blocks well. It was good to FINALLY see the RBs catching passes too. Speaking of that...

7) The offensive creativity was nice to see. We ran some pistol sets. We ran more compact formations without the wide splits. We did different things out of 12 personnel than we have in the past (like the PA bomb to Staley with 2 TEs in the backfield). We threw to the RBs. Some of the route combos look new. It was refreshing. I think having a veteran/heady QB is making this possible.

8) Obviously, JA hitting the deep ball was something UT fans were all glad to see after the overthrows of the last 2 years. That was simply a gorgeous throw. He could have had another one to Matthews, but he underthrew it slightly, forcing Matthews to slow down and giving the DB a chance to catch up. But even on his missed deep balls, at least they weren't overthrown. He gave his WR a chance and also left open the possibility of PI (which was this case on the other one). This is why it's better to underthrow than to overthrow.

9) Some other positive developments: 1) Nathan Robinson. No one talked about him preseason. He looked really good. 2) Colton Hood. He looks like a star. When McCoy comes back, what do you do with him? Good problem to have. 3) Lance Heard. He's a different player. 4) Miles Kitselman: 2 catches, a TD and a one handed by the goal line. 5) I thought Tyree Weathersby and Jamal Wallace looked good. Not great, but good. Both will contribute. 6) Arion Carter is a stud and Edwin Spillman is that dude. He's a better LB than Telander, but the coaches seem to love JT. I'm not saying JT is bad, but man, Carter and Spillman together are so athletic. Best LB combo in a long time.

10) Some concerns: 1) The injuries. I hope none are serious. We can't be getting into our depth pieces this early in the season. Moi needs to be okay. If not, Dom Bailey may move inside for good, not just rabbits or situational (with West and Weathersby available at SDE, we have the luxury there). And we may need to rush Utley's and Campbell's development. 2) I wasn't impressed with Caleb Herring. He kept crashing the end and giving up the edge, allowing chunk runs. And he got no pass rush. Jordan Ross looked a lot better and should be the #2 LEO after Saturday. Hopefully, Herring just had a bad game. 3) Where was Ethan Davis? I did notice his blocking has improved, but why isn't he being targeted? Maybe this is something we'll see in bigger games? 4) Still too many penalties. 7 for 65 yards. A lot of sloppiness, especially after we got a big lead.

11) Why did the NCAA impose a new fake injury rule, then avoid enforcing it? This crap has to stop. It's not just about the integrity of the game, it's about watchability. We're letting college football turn into soccer. It slows the game to a crawl. We'll be in the middle of an exciting drive, then boom. Fake injury. Commercial. It's awful.

It'll be interesting to see who plays and in what order against ETSU. Will Jordan Burns play? Will Goree? What about the freshman DBs like Walton, Poteat, Merritt, and Lewis? I'd like to see the young Olinemen (Warren, Ginther, Anderson, Satterwhite) and DTs (Campbell, Utley, Dye) get in early. Will any of the guys who were injured Saturday play or do they just hold them out? I look forward to seeing the personnel decisions in that game.

Anyway, fun start to the season. With Alabama losing to Florida State (and their Ty Simpson-led offense looking like garbage), the "9-3 is the median" prognostications are edging closer to 10-2.
Agree with everything you mentioned.
Yes,I suspect you will see a lot of young guys against ETSU. If for nothing else other than to let players heal up from the injury bug. I am aware that Cade is ETSUs QB, so we will need to put up 40 in the 1st half since YES our zone play in the secondary does not look good with wide open receivers.

I also would like to see the high throws worked out. I do remember HH sailing some throws. But yes, it was a nice weekend. I will be curious what College football looks like after week 4. I think by then, we will know what we have.

I'm not as down on the teams that lost as many are. I think some will rebound heavily.
 
#4
#4
Well done. Although I get your point about neutral site games, I personally hate them. College games belong on college campuses with the pageantry, tail gates, home crowds, etc. Soulless NFL stadiums are stale and boring for college matchups IMHO. Heck. I live in ATL and didn’t go to the game. I was pleasantly surprised by the talent on the field on Sat. I hope Syracuse is as solid as I think they are on offense, and a little better on defense.
I get it. And if the game had replaced a game on campus, I’d have a bigger issue with it.

BTW, that was my first time at Mercedes and that place is NICE.
 
#5
#5
I went down to Atlanta with some friends and we had a great time. I know a lot of our fans hate the neutral site games, but I've always enjoyed them. It's a chance to have fun in another city, interact with another fan base, and make a fun trip out of it. It's kind of akin to a bowl atmosphere. While this one was fun, it lacked a lot of the umph of some past neutral site trips. A) The Syracuse fan base didn't show up. At all. The announced attendance was 46,000 and Vol fans were at least 40,000 of those. B) The noon kickoff sucks. There isn't time to do anything. I would have loved to have visited the College Football Hall of Fame, but that was impossible with that kickoff time. The Charlotte trip last year was much better.

On to the game:

1) Obviously, we have to feel good about Aguilar and the offense coming out of that, while being a little concerned about the defense. Basically, the opposite of what we expected. I thought the substitution patterns on defense were a little odd, but maybe they're just testing personnel combos early in the season. Why was Ben Bolton the 4th LB? Where was Jordan Burns? Hurt? Harmon and Anes also played. Bolton and Anes were liabilities. Harmon missed a run fit to give up a chunk run, but later settled in and made some plays. It seemed like our defense gave up plays and scores when 3 things happened: 1) our backups were in, either due to injuries or the weird substitutions; 2) we gave up 4th down conversions (and long ones at that); 3) we played zone coverage. The zone coverage has to be better. We're really good in man. I'd like to see us play less zone, but you can't play 100% man.

2) Aguilar was really good, while also having plenty of things he can improve on. That's a great position to be in. He seemed to fix the high throw issues as the game went on. Something I'll mention...folks forget that Hooker had a tendency to sail throws high at times in 2021 and early 2022 because he ended up having such a great year. But it was a slight issue. It was fixed, obviously. Something about JA reminds me of HH. Similar runners. Their ball looks similar. Both can extend plays and keep their head about them. Both are leaders. I think we're really going to enjoy our season with Joey.

3) The oline looked good, especially with Sanders out. There was 1 snap issue and we were lucky not to lose the ball there. Perry whiffed on a pulling play on the goal line, but Lewis trucked the guy anyway. Otherwise, they played well. Aguilar had a clean pocket. There were plenty of running lanes. Sham will give us good depth when Sanders returns because I thought he looked good. I'd like to see one more Olineman develop into a good depth piece as the year goes on because being 7-8 deep is ideal. Bennett Warren would be the best candidate.

4) Jalen McMurray might've been the best player on the field. Boo Carter better get it in gear because JM played like a star Saturday. He sticks his nose in there and hits, in spite of being undersized (he reminded me a little of JJ McCleskey, and not just because of the #6). He was great in coverage, great rushing the QB on blitzes (caused the Telander INT), and was just an all around menace. Conversely, Boo missed a huge tackle on the QB that led to a score. Our CB situation, assuming none of the injuries are serious, is as good as its been in forever. McCoy and Gibson will likely be early draft entrees, but Hood and Redmond are future stars. I couldn't have been more impressed with Redmond in his first game. That kid just LOOKS like a future NFL high round pick. We're really good in the 2-deep at all 3 CB positions. As for Safety, Turrentine is solid, but not spectacular. He still tends to have a play or two where I wonder what he's doing. Farooq looked good to me. But we don't have the depth at Safety that we have at CB. Can't afford an injury there. Beasley didn't play well, IMO. And where was Sidney Walton? I thought he'd be the 4th CB. It was also strange that Wright got in at CB before Goree or one of the freshmen. But I guess this staff has never had a problem playing former walk-ons over recruited guys.

5) Yes, the WRs had some drops, but I actually liked what I saw from them. Staley was as good as we could have hoped. He's fast, he ran good routes, got separation, caught the ball, and showed he can do something with it. Matthews only had 2 catches, but he's quick. On his 2nd catch, he made two moves to make guys miss. He and Brazzell need to fix the drops, but they should. Game 1 usually sees WR drops (see Jeremiah Smith dropping bis 1st 2 targets Saturday). In fact, I think the glitches in the passing game (high throws, drops) will get ironed out more as these WRs get more acclimated to JA and vice-versa. Sometimes a high throw is a timing thing because the QB expected a deeper route or the WR expected the opposite. And a drop can also be a product of timing/discomfort. We saw less "glitches" as the game went on. I expect the same of the season.

6) How about these RBs? I did not expect that from Star Thomas. He doesn't look like the RB whose Duke film I watched when he signed. He's decisive. He's powerful. He runs possessed. I think he's our best RB and that's not a knock on Bishop or Lewis...both looked good. Lewis looks like a different RB. He's not dancing in the hole anymore. He's going to break some long runs this year. Bishop ran hard and sets up blocks well. It was good to FINALLY see the RBs catching passes too. Speaking of that...

7) The offensive creativity was nice to see. We ran some pistol sets. We ran more compact formations without the wide splits. We did different things out of 12 personnel than we have in the past (like the PA bomb to Staley with 2 TEs in the backfield). We threw to the RBs. Some of the route combos look new. It was refreshing. I think having a veteran/heady QB is making this possible.

8) Obviously, JA hitting the deep ball was something UT fans were all glad to see after the overthrows of the last 2 years. That was simply a gorgeous throw. He could have had another one to Matthews, but he underthrew it slightly, forcing Matthews to slow down and giving the DB a chance to catch up. But even on his missed deep balls, at least they weren't overthrown. He gave his WR a chance and also left open the possibility of PI (which was this case on the other one). This is why it's better to underthrow than to overthrow.

9) Some other positive developments: 1) Nathan Robinson. No one talked about him preseason. He looked really good. 2) Colton Hood. He looks like a star. When McCoy comes back, what do you do with him? Good problem to have. 3) Lance Heard. He's a different player. 4) Miles Kitselman: 2 catches, a TD and a one handed by the goal line. 5) I thought Tyree Weathersby and Jamal Wallace looked good. Not great, but good. Both will contribute. 6) Arion Carter is a stud and Edwin Spillman is that dude. He's a better LB than Telander, but the coaches seem to love JT. I'm not saying JT is bad, but man, Carter and Spillman together are so athletic. Best LB combo in a long time.

10) Some concerns: 1) The injuries. I hope none are serious. We can't be getting into our depth pieces this early in the season. Moi needs to be okay. If not, Dom Bailey may move inside for good, not just rabbits or situational (with West and Weathersby available at SDE, we have the luxury there). And we may need to rush Utley's and Campbell's development. 2) I wasn't impressed with Caleb Herring. He kept crashing the end and giving up the edge, allowing chunk runs. And he got no pass rush. Jordan Ross looked a lot better and should be the #2 LEO after Saturday. Hopefully, Herring just had a bad game. 3) Where was Ethan Davis? I did notice his blocking has improved, but why isn't he being targeted? Maybe this is something we'll see in bigger games? 4) Still too many penalties. 7 for 65 yards. A lot of sloppiness, especially after we got a big lead.

11) Why did the NCAA impose a new fake injury rule, then avoid enforcing it? This crap has to stop. It's not just about the integrity of the game, it's about watchability. We're letting college football turn into soccer. It slows the game to a crawl. We'll be in the middle of an exciting drive, then boom. Fake injury. Commercial. It's awful.

It'll be interesting to see who plays and in what order against ETSU. Will Jordan Burns play? Will Goree? What about the freshman DBs like Walton, Poteat, Merritt, and Lewis? I'd like to see the young Olinemen (Warren, Ginther, Anderson, Satterwhite) and DTs (Campbell, Utley, Dye) get in early. Will any of the guys who were injured Saturday play or do they just hold them out? I look forward to seeing the personnel decisions in that game.

Anyway, fun start to the season. With Alabama losing to Florida State (and their Ty Simpson-led offense looking like garbage), the "9-3 is the median" prognostications are edging closer to 10-2.
Great summary. I look forward to meeting whatever friend or relative wrote this. But seriously… Good stuff.

It’s unfair to do anything but laud that qb performance. He showed up in June, and put in a game that looked like a Senior with years in the system. He’s running about 1/2 the playbook, and there’s much more coming. Aguilar threw very well from a clean pocket. He made very smart reads on run/pass options, pre-snap calls, and check downs. Such a relief after Milton and Nico staring down routes. He threw a couple of dangerous balls, and the short ball to MM was one. Most of JA’s interceptions last year were caused by him short-stepping with the pocket collapsing. Short throwing step typically sends a high ball or a floater if the pressure causes an even shorter step. This was the case with Hooker too, and is common with QBs that don’t have tall frames/long arms. When we play big SEC lines, he’ll need to throw it out or tuck and run. Against Syracuse he threw a couple of balls that shouldn’t have come out, but didn’t pay for it. ETSU will give him some live timing throws deeper in the playbook. It’s worth noting that he does not throw the flat/out ball well. He did handle the quick screens and swing pass very well, but the most dangerous ball we throw is the out. That’s a pick six if you get it wrong. He’s going to have to get that one on a rope. Overall sigh of relief at the QB.


Our DL is a serious concern with the injuries and our safeties are not handling there assignments in man well. Unfortunately that means more standard zone coverage to limit gains. We’re going to have to watch a lot of slants cooking our coverage until we can get healthy and smart, and play more man.

Georgia will come with the same defensive scheme that has eaten us alive for the last two years. I think our OL can do better than in the past, but we’ll need big improvements to face them toe to toe. Similar story with defense. If we can’t play them at the line, it’ll be a long day.

Lots to build on, lots of growth needed. The floor feels like eight wins. The ceiling is probably ten. The difference is probably defined by our health and qb play against the big three.
 
#6
#6
A team is only penalized for faking injuries if they do it after the ball is spotted. Syracuse was doing it before the ref could spot the ball, therefore no penalties were called.

They have got to get this under control. Our game lasted 4 hours, which is ridiculous. The Texas/OSU game started after ours and finished before ours!
 
#7
#7
I went down to Atlanta with some friends and we had a great time. I know a lot of our fans hate the neutral site games, but I've always enjoyed them. It's a chance to have fun in another city, interact with another fan base, and make a fun trip out of it. It's kind of akin to a bowl atmosphere. While this one was fun, it lacked a lot of the umph of some past neutral site trips. A) The Syracuse fan base didn't show up. At all. The announced attendance was 46,000 and Vol fans were at least 40,000 of those. B) The noon kickoff sucks. There isn't time to do anything. I would have loved to have visited the College Football Hall of Fame, but that was impossible with that kickoff time. The Charlotte trip last year was much better.

On to the game:

1) Obviously, we have to feel good about Aguilar and the offense coming out of that, while being a little concerned about the defense. Basically, the opposite of what we expected. I thought the substitution patterns on defense were a little odd, but maybe they're just testing personnel combos early in the season. Why was Ben Bolton the 4th LB? Where was Jordan Burns? Hurt? Harmon and Anes also played. Bolton and Anes were liabilities. Harmon missed a run fit to give up a chunk run, but later settled in and made some plays. It seemed like our defense gave up plays and scores when 3 things happened: 1) our backups were in, either due to injuries or the weird substitutions; 2) we gave up 4th down conversions (and long ones at that); 3) we played zone coverage. The zone coverage has to be better. We're really good in man. I'd like to see us play less zone, but you can't play 100% man.

2) Aguilar was really good, while also having plenty of things he can improve on. That's a great position to be in. He seemed to fix the high throw issues as the game went on. Something I'll mention...folks forget that Hooker had a tendency to sail throws high at times in 2021 and early 2022 because he ended up having such a great year. But it was a slight issue. It was fixed, obviously. Something about JA reminds me of HH. Similar runners. Their ball looks similar. Both can extend plays and keep their head about them. Both are leaders. I think we're really going to enjoy our season with Joey.

3) The oline looked good, especially with Sanders out. There was 1 snap issue and we were lucky not to lose the ball there. Perry whiffed on a pulling play on the goal line, but Lewis trucked the guy anyway. Otherwise, they played well. Aguilar had a clean pocket. There were plenty of running lanes. Sham will give us good depth when Sanders returns because I thought he looked good. I'd like to see one more Olineman develop into a good depth piece as the year goes on because being 7-8 deep is ideal. Bennett Warren would be the best candidate.

4) Jalen McMurray might've been the best player on the field. Boo Carter better get it in gear because JM played like a star Saturday. He sticks his nose in there and hits, in spite of being undersized (he reminded me a little of JJ McCleskey, and not just because of the #6). He was great in coverage, great rushing the QB on blitzes (caused the Telander INT), and was just an all around menace. Conversely, Boo missed a huge tackle on the QB that led to a score. Our CB situation, assuming none of the injuries are serious, is as good as its been in forever. McCoy and Gibson will likely be early draft entrees, but Hood and Redmond are future stars. I couldn't have been more impressed with Redmond in his first game. That kid just LOOKS like a future NFL high round pick. We're really good in the 2-deep at all 3 CB positions. As for Safety, Turrentine is solid, but not spectacular. He still tends to have a play or two where I wonder what he's doing. Farooq looked good to me. But we don't have the depth at Safety that we have at CB. Can't afford an injury there. Beasley didn't play well, IMO. And where was Sidney Walton? I thought he'd be the 4th CB. It was also strange that Wright got in at CB before Goree or one of the freshmen. But I guess this staff has never had a problem playing former walk-ons over recruited guys.

5) Yes, the WRs had some drops, but I actually liked what I saw from them. Staley was as good as we could have hoped. He's fast, he ran good routes, got separation, caught the ball, and showed he can do something with it. Matthews only had 2 catches, but he's quick. On his 2nd catch, he made two moves to make guys miss. He and Brazzell need to fix the drops, but they should. Game 1 usually sees WR drops (see Jeremiah Smith dropping bis 1st 2 targets Saturday). In fact, I think the glitches in the passing game (high throws, drops) will get ironed out more as these WRs get more acclimated to JA and vice-versa. Sometimes a high throw is a timing thing because the QB expected a deeper route or the WR expected the opposite. And a drop can also be a product of timing/discomfort. We saw less "glitches" as the game went on. I expect the same of the season.

6) How about these RBs? I did not expect that from Star Thomas. He doesn't look like the RB whose Duke film I watched when he signed. He's decisive. He's powerful. He runs possessed. I think he's our best RB and that's not a knock on Bishop or Lewis...both looked good. Lewis looks like a different RB. He's not dancing in the hole anymore. He's going to break some long runs this year. Bishop ran hard and sets up blocks well. It was good to FINALLY see the RBs catching passes too. Speaking of that...

7) The offensive creativity was nice to see. We ran some pistol sets. We ran more compact formations without the wide splits. We did different things out of 12 personnel than we have in the past (like the PA bomb to Staley with 2 TEs in the backfield). We threw to the RBs. Some of the route combos look new. It was refreshing. I think having a veteran/heady QB is making this possible.

8) Obviously, JA hitting the deep ball was something UT fans were all glad to see after the overthrows of the last 2 years. That was simply a gorgeous throw. He could have had another one to Matthews, but he underthrew it slightly, forcing Matthews to slow down and giving the DB a chance to catch up. But even on his missed deep balls, at least they weren't overthrown. He gave his WR a chance and also left open the possibility of PI (which was this case on the other one). This is why it's better to underthrow than to overthrow.

9) Some other positive developments: 1) Nathan Robinson. No one talked about him preseason. He looked really good. 2) Colton Hood. He looks like a star. When McCoy comes back, what do you do with him? Good problem to have. 3) Lance Heard. He's a different player. 4) Miles Kitselman: 2 catches, a TD and a one handed by the goal line. 5) I thought Tyree Weathersby and Jamal Wallace looked good. Not great, but good. Both will contribute. 6) Arion Carter is a stud and Edwin Spillman is that dude. He's a better LB than Telander, but the coaches seem to love JT. I'm not saying JT is bad, but man, Carter and Spillman together are so athletic. Best LB combo in a long time.

10) Some concerns: 1) The injuries. I hope none are serious. We can't be getting into our depth pieces this early in the season. Moi needs to be okay. If not, Dom Bailey may move inside for good, not just rabbits or situational (with West and Weathersby available at SDE, we have the luxury there). And we may need to rush Utley's and Campbell's development. 2) I wasn't impressed with Caleb Herring. He kept crashing the end and giving up the edge, allowing chunk runs. And he got no pass rush. Jordan Ross looked a lot better and should be the #2 LEO after Saturday. Hopefully, Herring just had a bad game. 3) Where was Ethan Davis? I did notice his blocking has improved, but why isn't he being targeted? Maybe this is something we'll see in bigger games? 4) Still too many penalties. 7 for 65 yards. A lot of sloppiness, especially after we got a big lead.

11) Why did the NCAA impose a new fake injury rule, then avoid enforcing it? This crap has to stop. It's not just about the integrity of the game, it's about watchability. We're letting college football turn into soccer. It slows the game to a crawl. We'll be in the middle of an exciting drive, then boom. Fake injury. Commercial. It's awful.

It'll be interesting to see who plays and in what order against ETSU. Will Jordan Burns play? Will Goree? What about the freshman DBs like Walton, Poteat, Merritt, and Lewis? I'd like to see the young Olinemen (Warren, Ginther, Anderson, Satterwhite) and DTs (Campbell, Utley, Dye) get in early. Will any of the guys who were injured Saturday play or do they just hold them out? I look forward to seeing the personnel decisions in that game.

Anyway, fun start to the season. With Alabama losing to Florida State (and their Ty Simpson-led offense looking like garbage), the "9-3 is the median" prognostications are edging closer to 10-2.
Remember we play Bama in Tuscaloosa we won’t get any calls down there
 
#9
#9
I went down to Atlanta with some friends and we had a great time. I know a lot of our fans hate the neutral site games, but I've always enjoyed them. It's a chance to have fun in another city, interact with another fan base, and make a fun trip out of it. It's kind of akin to a bowl atmosphere. While this one was fun, it lacked a lot of the umph of some past neutral site trips. A) The Syracuse fan base didn't show up. At all. The announced attendance was 46,000 and Vol fans were at least 40,000 of those. B) The noon kickoff sucks. There isn't time to do anything. I would have loved to have visited the College Football Hall of Fame, but that was impossible with that kickoff time. The Charlotte trip last year was much better.

On to the game:

1) Obviously, we have to feel good about Aguilar and the offense coming out of that, while being a little concerned about the defense. Basically, the opposite of what we expected. I thought the substitution patterns on defense were a little odd, but maybe they're just testing personnel combos early in the season. Why was Ben Bolton the 4th LB? Where was Jordan Burns? Hurt? Harmon and Anes also played. Bolton and Anes were liabilities. Harmon missed a run fit to give up a chunk run, but later settled in and made some plays. It seemed like our defense gave up plays and scores when 3 things happened: 1) our backups were in, either due to injuries or the weird substitutions; 2) we gave up 4th down conversions (and long ones at that); 3) we played zone coverage. The zone coverage has to be better. We're really good in man. I'd like to see us play less zone, but you can't play 100% man.

2) Aguilar was really good, while also having plenty of things he can improve on. That's a great position to be in. He seemed to fix the high throw issues as the game went on. Something I'll mention...folks forget that Hooker had a tendency to sail throws high at times in 2021 and early 2022 because he ended up having such a great year. But it was a slight issue. It was fixed, obviously. Something about JA reminds me of HH. Similar runners. Their ball looks similar. Both can extend plays and keep their head about them. Both are leaders. I think we're really going to enjoy our season with Joey.

3) The oline looked good, especially with Sanders out. There was 1 snap issue and we were lucky not to lose the ball there. Perry whiffed on a pulling play on the goal line, but Lewis trucked the guy anyway. Otherwise, they played well. Aguilar had a clean pocket. There were plenty of running lanes. Sham will give us good depth when Sanders returns because I thought he looked good. I'd like to see one more Olineman develop into a good depth piece as the year goes on because being 7-8 deep is ideal. Bennett Warren would be the best candidate.

4) Jalen McMurray might've been the best player on the field. Boo Carter better get it in gear because JM played like a star Saturday. He sticks his nose in there and hits, in spite of being undersized (he reminded me a little of JJ McCleskey, and not just because of the #6). He was great in coverage, great rushing the QB on blitzes (caused the Telander INT), and was just an all around menace. Conversely, Boo missed a huge tackle on the QB that led to a score. Our CB situation, assuming none of the injuries are serious, is as good as its been in forever. McCoy and Gibson will likely be early draft entrees, but Hood and Redmond are future stars. I couldn't have been more impressed with Redmond in his first game. That kid just LOOKS like a future NFL high round pick. We're really good in the 2-deep at all 3 CB positions. As for Safety, Turrentine is solid, but not spectacular. He still tends to have a play or two where I wonder what he's doing. Farooq looked good to me. But we don't have the depth at Safety that we have at CB. Can't afford an injury there. Beasley didn't play well, IMO. And where was Sidney Walton? I thought he'd be the 4th CB. It was also strange that Wright got in at CB before Goree or one of the freshmen. But I guess this staff has never had a problem playing former walk-ons over recruited guys.

5) Yes, the WRs had some drops, but I actually liked what I saw from them. Staley was as good as we could have hoped. He's fast, he ran good routes, got separation, caught the ball, and showed he can do something with it. Matthews only had 2 catches, but he's quick. On his 2nd catch, he made two moves to make guys miss. He and Brazzell need to fix the drops, but they should. Game 1 usually sees WR drops (see Jeremiah Smith dropping bis 1st 2 targets Saturday). In fact, I think the glitches in the passing game (high throws, drops) will get ironed out more as these WRs get more acclimated to JA and vice-versa. Sometimes a high throw is a timing thing because the QB expected a deeper route or the WR expected the opposite. And a drop can also be a product of timing/discomfort. We saw less "glitches" as the game went on. I expect the same of the season.

6) How about these RBs? I did not expect that from Star Thomas. He doesn't look like the RB whose Duke film I watched when he signed. He's decisive. He's powerful. He runs possessed. I think he's our best RB and that's not a knock on Bishop or Lewis...both looked good. Lewis looks like a different RB. He's not dancing in the hole anymore. He's going to break some long runs this year. Bishop ran hard and sets up blocks well. It was good to FINALLY see the RBs catching passes too. Speaking of that...

7) The offensive creativity was nice to see. We ran some pistol sets. We ran more compact formations without the wide splits. We did different things out of 12 personnel than we have in the past (like the PA bomb to Staley with 2 TEs in the backfield). We threw to the RBs. Some of the route combos look new. It was refreshing. I think having a veteran/heady QB is making this possible.

8) Obviously, JA hitting the deep ball was something UT fans were all glad to see after the overthrows of the last 2 years. That was simply a gorgeous throw. He could have had another one to Matthews, but he underthrew it slightly, forcing Matthews to slow down and giving the DB a chance to catch up. But even on his missed deep balls, at least they weren't overthrown. He gave his WR a chance and also left open the possibility of PI (which was this case on the other one). This is why it's better to underthrow than to overthrow.

9) Some other positive developments: 1) Nathan Robinson. No one talked about him preseason. He looked really good. 2) Colton Hood. He looks like a star. When McCoy comes back, what do you do with him? Good problem to have. 3) Lance Heard. He's a different player. 4) Miles Kitselman: 2 catches, a TD and a one handed by the goal line. 5) I thought Tyree Weathersby and Jamal Wallace looked good. Not great, but good. Both will contribute. 6) Arion Carter is a stud and Edwin Spillman is that dude. He's a better LB than Telander, but the coaches seem to love JT. I'm not saying JT is bad, but man, Carter and Spillman together are so athletic. Best LB combo in a long time.

10) Some concerns: 1) The injuries. I hope none are serious. We can't be getting into our depth pieces this early in the season. Moi needs to be okay. If not, Dom Bailey may move inside for good, not just rabbits or situational (with West and Weathersby available at SDE, we have the luxury there). And we may need to rush Utley's and Campbell's development. 2) I wasn't impressed with Caleb Herring. He kept crashing the end and giving up the edge, allowing chunk runs. And he got no pass rush. Jordan Ross looked a lot better and should be the #2 LEO after Saturday. Hopefully, Herring just had a bad game. 3) Where was Ethan Davis? I did notice his blocking has improved, but why isn't he being targeted? Maybe this is something we'll see in bigger games? 4) Still too many penalties. 7 for 65 yards. A lot of sloppiness, especially after we got a big lead.

11) Why did the NCAA impose a new fake injury rule, then avoid enforcing it? This crap has to stop. It's not just about the integrity of the game, it's about watchability. We're letting college football turn into soccer. It slows the game to a crawl. We'll be in the middle of an exciting drive, then boom. Fake injury. Commercial. It's awful.

It'll be interesting to see who plays and in what order against ETSU. Will Jordan Burns play? Will Goree? What about the freshman DBs like Walton, Poteat, Merritt, and Lewis? I'd like to see the young Olinemen (Warren, Ginther, Anderson, Satterwhite) and DTs (Campbell, Utley, Dye) get in early. Will any of the guys who were injured Saturday play or do they just hold them out? I look forward to seeing the personnel decisions in that game.

Anyway, fun start to the season. With Alabama losing to Florida State (and their Ty Simpson-led offense looking like garbage), the "9-3 is the median" prognostications are edging closer to 10-2.
My thoughs exactly!
 
#10
#10
Great summary. I look forward to meeting whatever friend or relative wrote this. But seriously… Good stuff.

It’s unfair to do anything but laud that qb performance. He showed up in June, and put in a game that looked like a Senior with years in the system. He’s running about 1/2 the playbook, and there’s much more coming. Aguilar threw very well from a clean pocket. He made very smart reads on run/pass options, pre-snap calls, and check downs. Such a relief after Milton and Nico staring down routes. He threw a couple of dangerous balls, and the short ball to MM was one. Most of JA’s interceptions last year were caused by him short-stepping with the pocket collapsing. Short throwing step typically sends a high ball or a floater if the pressure causes an even shorter step. This was the case with Hooker too, and is common with QBs that don’t have tall frames/long arms. When we play big SEC lines, he’ll need to throw it out or tuck and run. Against Syracuse he threw a couple of balls that shouldn’t have come out, but didn’t pay for it. ETSU will give him some live timing throws deeper in the playbook. It’s worth noting that he does not throw the flat/out ball well. He did handle the quick screens and swing pass very well, but the most dangerous ball we throw is the out. That’s a pick six if you get it wrong. He’s going to have to get that one on a rope. Overall sigh of relief at the QB.


Our DL is a serious concern with the injuries and our safeties are not handling there assignments in man well. Unfortunately that means more standard zone coverage to limit gains. We’re going to have to watch a lot of slants cooking our coverage until we can get healthy and smart, and play more man.

Georgia will come with the same defensive scheme that has eaten us alive for the last two years. I think our OL can do better than in the past, but we’ll need big improvements to face them toe to toe. Similar story with defense. If we can’t play them at the line, it’ll be a long day.

Lots to build on, lots of growth needed. The floor feels like eight wins. The ceiling is probably ten. The difference is probably defined by our health and qb play against the big three.
I'm not hopeful for the Georgia game. I'm much more hopeful for the Alabama game than I was. If we can beat Bama and OU (Mateer looks good), and hold serve in the games we're supposed to win, then we're in the CFP. Florida is also a possibility, but there was nothing to take from their game. Both teams will look very different by then.
 
#11
#11
I went down to Atlanta with some friends and we had a great time. I know a lot of our fans hate the neutral site games, but I've always enjoyed them. It's a chance to have fun in another city, interact with another fan base, and make a fun trip out of it. It's kind of akin to a bowl atmosphere. While this one was fun, it lacked a lot of the umph of some past neutral site trips. A) The Syracuse fan base didn't show up. At all. The announced attendance was 46,000 and Vol fans were at least 40,000 of those. B) The noon kickoff sucks. There isn't time to do anything. I would have loved to have visited the College Football Hall of Fame, but that was impossible with that kickoff time. The Charlotte trip last year was much better.

On to the game:

1) Obviously, we have to feel good about Aguilar and the offense coming out of that, while being a little concerned about the defense. Basically, the opposite of what we expected. I thought the substitution patterns on defense were a little odd, but maybe they're just testing personnel combos early in the season. Why was Ben Bolton the 4th LB? Where was Jordan Burns? Hurt? Harmon and Anes also played. Bolton and Anes were liabilities. Harmon missed a run fit to give up a chunk run, but later settled in and made some plays. It seemed like our defense gave up plays and scores when 3 things happened: 1) our backups were in, either due to injuries or the weird substitutions; 2) we gave up 4th down conversions (and long ones at that); 3) we played zone coverage. The zone coverage has to be better. We're really good in man. I'd like to see us play less zone, but you can't play 100% man.

2) Aguilar was really good, while also having plenty of things he can improve on. That's a great position to be in. He seemed to fix the high throw issues as the game went on. Something I'll mention...folks forget that Hooker had a tendency to sail throws high at times in 2021 and early 2022 because he ended up having such a great year. But it was a slight issue. It was fixed, obviously. Something about JA reminds me of HH. Similar runners. Their ball looks similar. Both can extend plays and keep their head about them. Both are leaders. I think we're really going to enjoy our season with Joey.

3) The oline looked good, especially with Sanders out. There was 1 snap issue and we were lucky not to lose the ball there. Perry whiffed on a pulling play on the goal line, but Lewis trucked the guy anyway. Otherwise, they played well. Aguilar had a clean pocket. There were plenty of running lanes. Sham will give us good depth when Sanders returns because I thought he looked good. I'd like to see one more Olineman develop into a good depth piece as the year goes on because being 7-8 deep is ideal. Bennett Warren would be the best candidate.

4) Jalen McMurray might've been the best player on the field. Boo Carter better get it in gear because JM played like a star Saturday. He sticks his nose in there and hits, in spite of being undersized (he reminded me a little of JJ McCleskey, and not just because of the #6). He was great in coverage, great rushing the QB on blitzes (caused the Telander INT), and was just an all around menace. Conversely, Boo missed a huge tackle on the QB that led to a score. Our CB situation, assuming none of the injuries are serious, is as good as its been in forever. McCoy and Gibson will likely be early draft entrees, but Hood and Redmond are future stars. I couldn't have been more impressed with Redmond in his first game. That kid just LOOKS like a future NFL high round pick. We're really good in the 2-deep at all 3 CB positions. As for Safety, Turrentine is solid, but not spectacular. He still tends to have a play or two where I wonder what he's doing. Farooq looked good to me. But we don't have the depth at Safety that we have at CB. Can't afford an injury there. Beasley didn't play well, IMO. And where was Sidney Walton? I thought he'd be the 4th CB. It was also strange that Wright got in at CB before Goree or one of the freshmen. But I guess this staff has never had a problem playing former walk-ons over recruited guys.

5) Yes, the WRs had some drops, but I actually liked what I saw from them. Staley was as good as we could have hoped. He's fast, he ran good routes, got separation, caught the ball, and showed he can do something with it. Matthews only had 2 catches, but he's quick. On his 2nd catch, he made two moves to make guys miss. He and Brazzell need to fix the drops, but they should. Game 1 usually sees WR drops (see Jeremiah Smith dropping bis 1st 2 targets Saturday). In fact, I think the glitches in the passing game (high throws, drops) will get ironed out more as these WRs get more acclimated to JA and vice-versa. Sometimes a high throw is a timing thing because the QB expected a deeper route or the WR expected the opposite. And a drop can also be a product of timing/discomfort. We saw less "glitches" as the game went on. I expect the same of the season.

6) How about these RBs? I did not expect that from Star Thomas. He doesn't look like the RB whose Duke film I watched when he signed. He's decisive. He's powerful. He runs possessed. I think he's our best RB and that's not a knock on Bishop or Lewis...both looked good. Lewis looks like a different RB. He's not dancing in the hole anymore. He's going to break some long runs this year. Bishop ran hard and sets up blocks well. It was good to FINALLY see the RBs catching passes too. Speaking of that...

7) The offensive creativity was nice to see. We ran some pistol sets. We ran more compact formations without the wide splits. We did different things out of 12 personnel than we have in the past (like the PA bomb to Staley with 2 TEs in the backfield). We threw to the RBs. Some of the route combos look new. It was refreshing. I think having a veteran/heady QB is making this possible.

8) Obviously, JA hitting the deep ball was something UT fans were all glad to see after the overthrows of the last 2 years. That was simply a gorgeous throw. He could have had another one to Matthews, but he underthrew it slightly, forcing Matthews to slow down and giving the DB a chance to catch up. But even on his missed deep balls, at least they weren't overthrown. He gave his WR a chance and also left open the possibility of PI (which was this case on the other one). This is why it's better to underthrow than to overthrow.

9) Some other positive developments: 1) Nathan Robinson. No one talked about him preseason. He looked really good. 2) Colton Hood. He looks like a star. When McCoy comes back, what do you do with him? Good problem to have. 3) Lance Heard. He's a different player. 4) Miles Kitselman: 2 catches, a TD and a one handed by the goal line. 5) I thought Tyree Weathersby and Jamal Wallace looked good. Not great, but good. Both will contribute. 6) Arion Carter is a stud and Edwin Spillman is that dude. He's a better LB than Telander, but the coaches seem to love JT. I'm not saying JT is bad, but man, Carter and Spillman together are so athletic. Best LB combo in a long time.

10) Some concerns: 1) The injuries. I hope none are serious. We can't be getting into our depth pieces this early in the season. Moi needs to be okay. If not, Dom Bailey may move inside for good, not just rabbits or situational (with West and Weathersby available at SDE, we have the luxury there). And we may need to rush Utley's and Campbell's development. 2) I wasn't impressed with Caleb Herring. He kept crashing the end and giving up the edge, allowing chunk runs. And he got no pass rush. Jordan Ross looked a lot better and should be the #2 LEO after Saturday. Hopefully, Herring just had a bad game. 3) Where was Ethan Davis? I did notice his blocking has improved, but why isn't he being targeted? Maybe this is something we'll see in bigger games? 4) Still too many penalties. 7 for 65 yards. A lot of sloppiness, especially after we got a big lead.

11) Why did the NCAA impose a new fake injury rule, then avoid enforcing it? This crap has to stop. It's not just about the integrity of the game, it's about watchability. We're letting college football turn into soccer. It slows the game to a crawl. We'll be in the middle of an exciting drive, then boom. Fake injury. Commercial. It's awful.

It'll be interesting to see who plays and in what order against ETSU. Will Jordan Burns play? Will Goree? What about the freshman DBs like Walton, Poteat, Merritt, and Lewis? I'd like to see the young Olinemen (Warren, Ginther, Anderson, Satterwhite) and DTs (Campbell, Utley, Dye) get in early. Will any of the guys who were injured Saturday play or do they just hold them out? I look forward to seeing the personnel decisions in that game.

Anyway, fun start to the season. With Alabama losing to Florida State (and their Ty Simpson-led offense looking like garbage), the "9-3 is the median" prognostications are edging closer to 10-2.
My son and I got great seats for $50 each, but a 3:30 or later kickoff would have been great.
It was still a blast, even though splitting a bucket of beers at 10:15 am is a little more difficult for me than it was years ago.

And Mercedes is great. Been there a few times now (saw TN play GT in the second game ever played in the Benz)
We got 2 hamburgers, 2 orders of fries, 2 beers, and a refillable soda for $35. Got a $2 bag of popcorn later in the game.
You will not find cheaper prices at any stadium.
 
#13
#13
I went down to Atlanta with some friends and we had a great time. I know a lot of our fans hate the neutral site games, but I've always enjoyed them. It's a chance to have fun in another city, interact with another fan base, and make a fun trip out of it. It's kind of akin to a bowl atmosphere. While this one was fun, it lacked a lot of the umph of some past neutral site trips. A) The Syracuse fan base didn't show up. At all. The announced attendance was 46,000 and Vol fans were at least 40,000 of those. B) The noon kickoff sucks. There isn't time to do anything. I would have loved to have visited the College Football Hall of Fame, but that was impossible with that kickoff time. The Charlotte trip last year was much better.

On to the game:

1) Obviously, we have to feel good about Aguilar and the offense coming out of that, while being a little concerned about the defense. Basically, the opposite of what we expected. I thought the substitution patterns on defense were a little odd, but maybe they're just testing personnel combos early in the season. Why was Ben Bolton the 4th LB? Where was Jordan Burns? Hurt? Harmon and Anes also played. Bolton and Anes were liabilities. Harmon missed a run fit to give up a chunk run, but later settled in and made some plays. It seemed like our defense gave up plays and scores when 3 things happened: 1) our backups were in, either due to injuries or the weird substitutions; 2) we gave up 4th down conversions (and long ones at that); 3) we played zone coverage. The zone coverage has to be better. We're really good in man. I'd like to see us play less zone, but you can't play 100% man.

2) Aguilar was really good, while also having plenty of things he can improve on. That's a great position to be in. He seemed to fix the high throw issues as the game went on. Something I'll mention...folks forget that Hooker had a tendency to sail throws high at times in 2021 and early 2022 because he ended up having such a great year. But it was a slight issue. It was fixed, obviously. Something about JA reminds me of HH. Similar runners. Their ball looks similar. Both can extend plays and keep their head about them. Both are leaders. I think we're really going to enjoy our season with Joey.

3) The oline looked good, especially with Sanders out. There was 1 snap issue and we were lucky not to lose the ball there. Perry whiffed on a pulling play on the goal line, but Lewis trucked the guy anyway. Otherwise, they played well. Aguilar had a clean pocket. There were plenty of running lanes. Sham will give us good depth when Sanders returns because I thought he looked good. I'd like to see one more Olineman develop into a good depth piece as the year goes on because being 7-8 deep is ideal. Bennett Warren would be the best candidate.

4) Jalen McMurray might've been the best player on the field. Boo Carter better get it in gear because JM played like a star Saturday. He sticks his nose in there and hits, in spite of being undersized (he reminded me a little of JJ McCleskey, and not just because of the #6). He was great in coverage, great rushing the QB on blitzes (caused the Telander INT), and was just an all around menace. Conversely, Boo missed a huge tackle on the QB that led to a score. Our CB situation, assuming none of the injuries are serious, is as good as its been in forever. McCoy and Gibson will likely be early draft entrees, but Hood and Redmond are future stars. I couldn't have been more impressed with Redmond in his first game. That kid just LOOKS like a future NFL high round pick. We're really good in the 2-deep at all 3 CB positions. As for Safety, Turrentine is solid, but not spectacular. He still tends to have a play or two where I wonder what he's doing. Farooq looked good to me. But we don't have the depth at Safety that we have at CB. Can't afford an injury there. Beasley didn't play well, IMO. And where was Sidney Walton? I thought he'd be the 4th CB. It was also strange that Wright got in at CB before Goree or one of the freshmen. But I guess this staff has never had a problem playing former walk-ons over recruited guys.

5) Yes, the WRs had some drops, but I actually liked what I saw from them. Staley was as good as we could have hoped. He's fast, he ran good routes, got separation, caught the ball, and showed he can do something with it. Matthews only had 2 catches, but he's quick. On his 2nd catch, he made two moves to make guys miss. He and Brazzell need to fix the drops, but they should. Game 1 usually sees WR drops (see Jeremiah Smith dropping bis 1st 2 targets Saturday). In fact, I think the glitches in the passing game (high throws, drops) will get ironed out more as these WRs get more acclimated to JA and vice-versa. Sometimes a high throw is a timing thing because the QB expected a deeper route or the WR expected the opposite. And a drop can also be a product of timing/discomfort. We saw less "glitches" as the game went on. I expect the same of the season.

6) How about these RBs? I did not expect that from Star Thomas. He doesn't look like the RB whose Duke film I watched when he signed. He's decisive. He's powerful. He runs possessed. I think he's our best RB and that's not a knock on Bishop or Lewis...both looked good. Lewis looks like a different RB. He's not dancing in the hole anymore. He's going to break some long runs this year. Bishop ran hard and sets up blocks well. It was good to FINALLY see the RBs catching passes too. Speaking of that...

7) The offensive creativity was nice to see. We ran some pistol sets. We ran more compact formations without the wide splits. We did different things out of 12 personnel than we have in the past (like the PA bomb to Staley with 2 TEs in the backfield). We threw to the RBs. Some of the route combos look new. It was refreshing. I think having a veteran/heady QB is making this possible.

8) Obviously, JA hitting the deep ball was something UT fans were all glad to see after the overthrows of the last 2 years. That was simply a gorgeous throw. He could have had another one to Matthews, but he underthrew it slightly, forcing Matthews to slow down and giving the DB a chance to catch up. But even on his missed deep balls, at least they weren't overthrown. He gave his WR a chance and also left open the possibility of PI (which was this case on the other one). This is why it's better to underthrow than to overthrow.

9) Some other positive developments: 1) Nathan Robinson. No one talked about him preseason. He looked really good. 2) Colton Hood. He looks like a star. When McCoy comes back, what do you do with him? Good problem to have. 3) Lance Heard. He's a different player. 4) Miles Kitselman: 2 catches, a TD and a one handed by the goal line. 5) I thought Tyree Weathersby and Jamal Wallace looked good. Not great, but good. Both will contribute. 6) Arion Carter is a stud and Edwin Spillman is that dude. He's a better LB than Telander, but the coaches seem to love JT. I'm not saying JT is bad, but man, Carter and Spillman together are so athletic. Best LB combo in a long time.

10) Some concerns: 1) The injuries. I hope none are serious. We can't be getting into our depth pieces this early in the season. Moi needs to be okay. If not, Dom Bailey may move inside for good, not just rabbits or situational (with West and Weathersby available at SDE, we have the luxury there). And we may need to rush Utley's and Campbell's development. 2) I wasn't impressed with Caleb Herring. He kept crashing the end and giving up the edge, allowing chunk runs. And he got no pass rush. Jordan Ross looked a lot better and should be the #2 LEO after Saturday. Hopefully, Herring just had a bad game. 3) Where was Ethan Davis? I did notice his blocking has improved, but why isn't he being targeted? Maybe this is something we'll see in bigger games? 4) Still too many penalties. 7 for 65 yards. A lot of sloppiness, especially after we got a big lead.

11) Why did the NCAA impose a new fake injury rule, then avoid enforcing it? This crap has to stop. It's not just about the integrity of the game, it's about watchability. We're letting college football turn into soccer. It slows the game to a crawl. We'll be in the middle of an exciting drive, then boom. Fake injury. Commercial. It's awful.

It'll be interesting to see who plays and in what order against ETSU. Will Jordan Burns play? Will Goree? What about the freshman DBs like Walton, Poteat, Merritt, and Lewis? I'd like to see the young Olinemen (Warren, Ginther, Anderson, Satterwhite) and DTs (Campbell, Utley, Dye) get in early. Will any of the guys who were injured Saturday play or do they just hold them out? I look forward to seeing the personnel decisions in that game.

Anyway, fun start to the season. With Alabama losing to Florida State (and their Ty Simpson-led offense looking like garbage), the "9-3 is the median" prognostications are edging closer to 10-2.
NCAA is irrelevant in SEC play, because Sankey as stated he is going to start fining coaches for the flopping
 
#14
#14
Thought the defense would be better and ahead of the offense. Hope it was only first game jitters. Better step it up in two weeks. Syracuse is good. Not like NC State or Virginia.
 
#17
#17
I'm not hopeful for the Georgia game. I'm much more hopeful for the Alabama game than I was. If we can beat Bama and OU (Mateer looks good), and hold serve in the games we're supposed to win, then we're in the CFP. Florida is also a possibility, but there was nothing to take from their game. Both teams will look very different by then.
Agree. Sadly I think Florida is very deep and very talented too. Could be a tough one.
 
  • Like
Reactions: VollerNbham
#18
#18
A team is only penalized for faking injuries if they do it after the ball is spotted. Syracuse was doing it before the ref could spot the ball, therefore no penalties were called.

They have got to get this under control. Our game lasted 4 hours, which is ridiculous. The Texas/OSU game started after ours and finished before ours!
You do know that we (Vols) fake injuries all the time also. Just about every XP after the offense scores quickly has an injury timeout ( extra time to rest the defense). I agree it's got to be cleaned up.
 
#20
#20
A team is only penalized for faking injuries if they do it after the ball is spotted. Syracuse was doing it before the ref could spot the ball, therefore no penalties were called.

They have got to get this under control. Our game lasted 4 hours, which is ridiculous. The Texas/OSU game started after ours and finished before ours!
Yep, it’s basically a rule with no teeth. Just go down right after the play ends and you are allowed to stop the game.
 
#22
#22
I agree with most but I think the defense is better than most think. Josh Pate said on participation stats, we had 21 people registered as making tackles. I think between injuries and Banks seeing what he has, created some of the issues. By the way Rickey Gibson out for extended period according to Heupel today. I’m going on a limb saying we will beat Georgia
 
#23
#23
Biggest concern is the interior DL. We didnt get the constant penetration like in years past and with the injuries, we may be in serous trouble. Would like for Tyre West to get more run, 14 snaps are not enough.

Agree about Herring, he never set the edge and crashed down too much on several runs. J Ross should be the #2 LEO.
 
Advertisement



Back
Top