My idea for football.

[LadyinOrange]

I don't see why the scout teams can't play each other in the off-season. Losing one of them to injury (NOT that I want them to get hurt!&#33 wouldn't be as big a deal as losing a first-teamer, and since most of them are walk-on and non-scholarship, why would the NCAA care? Some of the second-teamers might emerge as surprise stars. At least the kids that never get to play would have their moment and football fans wouldn't have to suffer a 7-8 month drought. I know things like weather, travel expense, etc would be huge factors, but if baseball can run for almost a whole dadgum year, why can't football?? I bet OUR scout team is better than Florida's. LOL

 

[Freak]

I would be for it. Did you think this up on your own??

 

[LadyinOrange]

Originally posted by vol_freak@Feb 16 2004, 07:48 PM
I would be for it. Did you think this up on your own??

Yes, I did. Does that surprise you?


Another benefit would be our scout team getting better by playing other teams and then giving the first team more competition.

 

[Freak]

It doesn't suprise me...I just thought maybe you had seen it somewhere else. :dunno:

It seems like the problem would be the coaches having enough time to oversee something like that.

 

[LadyinOrange]

Assistant coaches could earn their pay.

 

[Freak]

Originally posted by LadyinOrange@Feb 16 2004, 03:11 PM
Assistant coaches could earn their pay.

Or certain ones could further prove that it is impossible for them to earn their pay.

 

[LadyinOrange]

Originally posted by vol_freak+Feb 16 2004, 08:24 PM--></div><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td>QUOTE (vol_freak @ Feb 16 2004, 08:24 PM)</td></tr><tr><td id='QUOTE'> <!--QuoteBegin-LadyinOrange@Feb 16 2004, 03:11 PM
Assistant coaches could earn their pay. 

Or certain ones could further prove that it is impossible for them to earn their pay. [/quote]
:lolup: :lolup: :lolup: