Muschamp's reaction to a bad call versus Dooley's.

#1
V

volumnus

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jun 22, 2009
Messages
232
Likes
0
#1
To me, Muschamp made it abundantly clear that he wouldn't tolerate any more officiating BS. If it wasn't perfectly clear, he called a timeout and drove the point home once more. Dooley just kind of smiles. I'd like to see him get in the officials' faces a little more. Is it rape if you just let it happen?
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
#7
#7
ole_orange said:
Muschamp is a joke.
Click to expand...

He was Tennessee's first choice after being left in a lurch by Kiffin, but he turned us down. I don't think he represents what I'd like college football to be, but I don't think any of the successful coaches do? I like him better than Calipari!
 
#8
#8
volumnus said:
To me, Muschamp made it abundantly clear that he wouldn't tolerate any more officiating BS. If it wasn't perfectly clear, he called a timeout and drove the point home once more. Dooley just kind of smiles. I'd like to see him get in the officials' faces a little more. Is it rape if you just let it happen?
Click to expand...


Ya and did you read his lips in what he was saying to the referee!!!!! He is an out of control and arrogant loud mouth!!!!!
 
  • Like
Reactions: 3 people
#10
#10
i still can't believe we didn't get that facemask call on our second drive. that would have put us in position to score. I'm sure it wouldn't have mattered in the grand scheme but how the hell do you miss that?
 
  • Like
Reactions: 5 people
#11
#11
volumnus said:
To me, Muschamp made it abundantly clear that he wouldn't tolerate any more officiating BS. If it wasn't perfectly clear, he called a timeout and drove the point home once more. Dooley just kind of smiles. I'd like to see him get in the officials' faces a little more. Is it rape if you just let it happen?
Click to expand...

btw, were talking about football not rape but the answer is yes.
 
#16
#16
Jmavols2 said:
And u know this how?
Click to expand...

Dooley is not favored by the players. That's okay if you are a proven winner.

Dooley envisions himself as a disciplinarian, but he has no record of success. Some might say he has a legacy of failure. It's hard to be a hardass when you lack winning credentials.
 
#17
#17
volumnus said:
Dooley is not favored by the players. That's okay if you are a proven winner.

Dooley envisions himself as a disciplinarian, but he has no record of success. Some might say he has a legacy of failure. It's hard to be a hardass when you lack winning credentials.
Click to expand...

So what players have you talked to that do not like him?
 
#18
#18
volumnus said:
Dooley is not favored by the players. That's okay if you are a proven winner.

Dooley envisions himself as a disciplinarian, but he has no record of success. Some might say he has a legacy of failure. It's hard to be a hardass when you lack winning credentials.
Click to expand...

None of what you are saying is true.
 
#21
#21
volumnus said:
To me, Muschamp made it abundantly clear that he wouldn't tolerate any more officiating BS. If it wasn't perfectly clear, he called a timeout and drove the point home once more. Dooley just kind of smiles. I'd like to see him get in the officials' faces a little more. Is it rape if you just let it happen?
Click to expand...
When the Tennessee job was open didn't Muschamp turn us down. (which i am glad he did) And didn't Muschamp tell Hammy to talk to Dooley?
 
#23
#23
We should all be thankful we ended up with Dooley rather than Muschamp. I would have to strongly consider becoming a Vandy fan if I had to watch him on our sideline.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
New posts
You must log in or register to reply here.
Advertisement



Back
Top