Monster Year for UGA & OU

#1
rexvol

rexvol

The Minister of Defense
Joined
Apr 29, 2006
Messages
18,124
Likes
54
#1
USA Today had a great article on recruiting yesterday and it listed the top 50 recruits. UGA is all over it and OU as well, but the Vols arent on a one yet.
 
#2
#2
that'll change... last year at this time we weren't much better than we are right now and look how we ended up.
 
#3
#3
whether you like it or not, you'll have to admit that the other schools are off to a very quick start.
 
#4
#4
lacrossepro70 said:
whether you like it or not, you'll have to admit that the other schools are off to a very quick start.
Click to expand...

I agree but look at Texas and how they started out last year... They ended up losing commitments and dropped down from the top recruiting spot. They still had a good class but wasn't as good as everyone thought it would be....
 
#5
#5
No1UtFanJmAn147 said:
I agree but look at Texas and how they started out last year... They ended up losing commitments and dropped down from the top recruiting spot. They still had a good class but wasn't as good as everyone thought it would be....
Click to expand...

Mainly because they figured they could quit recruiting and just focus on football. That's why I'm guessing they're in favor of an earlier signing period.
 
#6
#6
Last year it was UF (post from 5/4/06). Our recruiting is very rarely a major concern.

rexvol said:
Looking at what Florida did last year and how they have started this year in recruiting, they might be running away from us. How did we fall so far so fast??
Click to expand...
 
#7
#7
last year was a pleasant suprise, if you'll recall UF ended up with an awesome year in recruiting and will do so again. So Pj, how am I wrong for pointing out that UGA has commits from four guys in the top fifty already? Am I lying? Does Tennessee have one that I am unaware of? the reality is that a trend has developed over the last couple of years of top guys commiting early. just look at the list and it speaks for itself.
 
#8
#8
so far, the teams that are just killin it out there are OU, anOSU, UM, ND, UCLA, UGA, USC, and UCLA. all of these teams are tearing it up
 
#10
#10
quality is the important thing... i agree


i don't like the whole rivals/scout team rankings -- they are a product of numbers and quality.... but they disregard teams that are short on scholarships. teams that take 17 excellent players due to scholly limitations can be ranked below teams that take 25 decent players.

eh, rankings don't matter much anyway. this is a year to fill up on the big uglies.
 
#12
#12
karvassal said:
quality is the important thing... i agree


i don't like the whole rivals/scout team rankings -- they are a product of numbers and quality.... but they disregard teams that are short on scholarships. teams that take 17 excellent players due to scholly limitations can be ranked below teams that take 25 decent players.

eh, rankings don't matter much anyway. this is a year to fill up on the big uglies.
Click to expand...

number of scholarships available should have nothing to do with rankings. It's not a recruiting efficiency rating, it's the overall talent in a class and that's it.
 
New posts
You must log in or register to reply here.

VN Store



Back
Top