MJ: I could beat LeBron 1-on-1 in my prime

Stop collaborate and listen
Huff is back on a trollin mission
Something absurd he's spittin
Worse than the Bruce Pearl petition
Trollin like a boss daily and nightly
A crazy thought grabs his brain so damn tightly
Will it ever stop...yo I don't know
If I keep this up he might blow
To the extreme I poke the bear like camper
Watch him cry, please Huff put on a pamper

VolNation Huffhines baby...he trolls he trolls, VolNation Huffhines baby...he trolls he trolls,

I'm out, word to your mother
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: 4 people
rB0MHXu.png
 
You win by being more efficient than the other team, or by out-rebounding them, or both. There's no way around that fact.

Your exact words about their efficiency was "they weren't very efficient"....they still won so it doesn't matter if they "weren't very efficient".
 
Your exact words about their efficiency was "they weren't very efficient"....they still won so it doesn't matter if they "weren't very efficient".

"....shooting the ball"

You forgot that part. Offensive efficiency and shooting efficiency are not the same thing.

They still won because they were good at other things. We're in agreement that their shooting efficiency didn't matter because they still won. I'm explaining why they still won.
 
Last edited:
"....shooting the ball"

You forgot that part. Offensive efficiency and shooting efficiency are not the same thing.

They still won because they were good at other things. We're in agreement that they're shooting efficiency didn't matter because they still won. I'm explaining why they still won.

So you're arguing just to argue, if we are in agreement?


Im out.
 
I didn't know we were arguing. You're talking about whether or not efficiency matters. I'm talking about why they won.
 
MClRyft.gif


You just ended every basketball conversation that would have ever existed on this site. Shut down the forum!
 

VN Store



Back
Top