SaintLouisVol
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Feb 8, 2010
- Messages
- 3,049
- Likes
- 4,338
I've lived in the St. Louis area for nearly 15 years. I don't live in the city. I live in the western, middle class 'burbs in one of the more conservative pockets. I've raised three kids here. It's a safe, friendly place to be. I am quite happy.
Once you get used to the traffic and congestion of nearly 3 million people, it's no big deal.
It's not the south. It's Midwest and has far more diversity in heritage. It's not like East Tennessee where 80 percent of the people are Scots Irish. The oddest thing for me to get used to is that it is probably 90 percent Catholic. As a boy raised in East Tennessee, that has taken some getting used to.
It's nice have a MLB team, an NFL team and an NHL team in town. It also has a top symphony and a beautiful theater that hosts most all touring Broadway productions.
As for O'Fallon, IL. It is a St. Louis Suburb also. It doesn't surprise me the MU is pressing there. Pinkel has been working to secure St. Louis since he got to Missouri.
As for the MU, itself, it is a wonderful campus. It's smaller than UT and less industrial looking. Overall, I would agree that it is nicer.
The town of Columbia is pretty scruffy. I don't care for it at all. Plus, it's VERY small. It's not much bigger than Morristown or Jackson. It has to be one of the smallest towns (that is a decent distance from a bigger town) in the SEC. That's a strike against them for sure.
If you are more interested in the lifestyle and glamour of college mixed in with some football, I can certainly see how Missouri would be unattractive.
But, if are someone who sees football as an opportunity to get a free college degree and can actually see life beyond football, MU would be an excellent choice. It is an excellent school with an outstanding academic reputation. It that sense, I believe it would trump UT. (depending on your major).
Once you get used to the traffic and congestion of nearly 3 million people, it's no big deal.
It's not the south. It's Midwest and has far more diversity in heritage. It's not like East Tennessee where 80 percent of the people are Scots Irish. The oddest thing for me to get used to is that it is probably 90 percent Catholic. As a boy raised in East Tennessee, that has taken some getting used to.
It's nice have a MLB team, an NFL team and an NHL team in town. It also has a top symphony and a beautiful theater that hosts most all touring Broadway productions.
As for O'Fallon, IL. It is a St. Louis Suburb also. It doesn't surprise me the MU is pressing there. Pinkel has been working to secure St. Louis since he got to Missouri.
As for the MU, itself, it is a wonderful campus. It's smaller than UT and less industrial looking. Overall, I would agree that it is nicer.
The town of Columbia is pretty scruffy. I don't care for it at all. Plus, it's VERY small. It's not much bigger than Morristown or Jackson. It has to be one of the smallest towns (that is a decent distance from a bigger town) in the SEC. That's a strike against them for sure.
If you are more interested in the lifestyle and glamour of college mixed in with some football, I can certainly see how Missouri would be unattractive.
But, if are someone who sees football as an opportunity to get a free college degree and can actually see life beyond football, MU would be an excellent choice. It is an excellent school with an outstanding academic reputation. It that sense, I believe it would trump UT. (depending on your major).