DaUndergroundMan
If your name ain't YKK, get off my .....
- Joined
- Sep 25, 2016
- Messages
- 1,539
- Likes
- 1,910
Definitely, but think Pruitt will want to try and run it if we can. If we're scoring quickly, and Miz matching us with long drives, it could be a shootout. Just like with GA and SC, if our D has been on the field alot, we could have a tough time in 4th qtr because we're gassed with lack of depth. So, I think Pruitt will want some long time consuming drives to keep their offense off the field...though certainly taking shots down field.
I think this is a bad match up. It's the WVU game all over again but Drew Lock is a better QB, and Mizzou has a better stable of WRs, RBs than WV had.
I'm excited because we will get to see how much progress our corners have made since game 1, and the defense as a whole.
As far as attacking their defense, I think it's a catch 22. If we hit on the deep passes that's fine. But if we are passing alot, we are lengthening the game, and therefore giving their offense more snaps. An offense that can strike quick.
I'd like to see us run the ball and string together a few 5-7 minute drives to limit their offensive flow and snaps. We need to get it to the 4th qtr. and hope we're in position for a punchers chance. I think Mizzou has one of the more deceptive records in the country. They could easily be a 1 loss team in one of the garbage conferences like B12 or Pac.
Tied for 30th in the country. They’re tied with LSU’s run defense when it comes to rushing yards per game.
Though I don’t know whether or not that’s more an effect of teams opting to pass against them more (due to the higher rate of success).
Got it. 50pass/50rush. Hut hut!!!I think this is a bad match up. It's the WVU game all over again but Drew Lock is a better QB, and Mizzou has a better stable of WRs, RBs than WV had.
I'm excited because we will get to see how much progress our corners have made since game 1, and the defense as a whole.
As far as attacking their defense, I think it's a catch 22. If we hit on the deep passes that's fine. But if we are passing alot, we are lengthening the game, and therefore giving their offense more snaps. An offense that can strike quick.
I'd like to see us run the ball and string together a few 5-7 minute drives to limit their offensive flow and snaps. We need to get it to the 4th qtr. and hope we're in position for a punchers chance. I think Mizzou has one of the more deceptive records in the country. They could easily be a 1 loss team in one of the garbage conferences like B12 or Pac.
Really? Not giving our defense enough credit imo.
You are crazier than hell if Lock is better than Grier and the weapons WVU has. Seen both play in person and Lock is good but makes a lot more mistakes than Grier plus first game of the year.I think this is a bad match up. It's the WVU game all over again but Drew Lock is a better QB, and Mizzou has a better stable of WRs, RBs than WV had.
I'm excited because we will get to see how much progress our corners have made since game 1, and the defense as a whole.
As far as attacking their defense, I think it's a catch 22. If we hit on the deep passes that's fine. But if we are passing alot, we are lengthening the game, and therefore giving their offense more snaps. An offense that can strike quick.
I'd like to see us run the ball and string together a few 5-7 minute drives to limit their offensive flow and snaps. We need to get it to the 4th qtr. and hope we're in position for a punchers chance. I think Mizzou has one of the more deceptive records in the country. They could easily be a 1 loss team in one of the garbage conferences like B12 or Pac.
Not sure I buy your take. Drew Locke is a couple of levels below Will Grier. And WVUs WRs are night and day better than Missouri’s. No way Kentucky could hold WVU to 13 points. Locke is an inconsistent QB. The key to this game is stifling Missouri’s running attack. If we can get them in predictable passing situations, I like our chances. Our secondary has developed to become a formidable unit. And this week with Flowers coming back, this will be the 1st time in awhile that they are at full strength.I think this is a bad match up. It's the WVU game all over again but Drew Lock is a better QB, and Mizzou has a better stable of WRs, RBs than WV had.
I'm excited because we will get to see how much progress our corners have made since game 1, and the defense as a whole.
As far as attacking their defense, I think it's a catch 22. If we hit on the deep passes that's fine. But if we are passing alot, we are lengthening the game, and therefore giving their offense more snaps. An offense that can strike quick.
I'd like to see us run the ball and string together a few 5-7 minute drives to limit their offensive flow and snaps. We need to get it to the 4th qtr. and hope we're in position for a punchers chance. I think Mizzou has one of the more deceptive records in the country. They could easily be a 1 loss team in one of the garbage conferences like B12 or Pac.
Mizzous offense has better RBs than WVU, that would be their only edge.
It will take pressure on the QB and stopping the run. Far better QB than Kentucky has need Taylor to stay in his face all game while we make them one dimensional. Seems to be a game where we'll have to score 30 to win. I don't think they can cover our WR's hopefully our running game is effective that will make it even tougher for them to defense the pass.
Not sure I buy your take. Drew Locke is a couple of levels below Will Grier. And WVUs WRs are night and day better than Missouri’s. No way Kentucky could hold WVU to 13 points. Locke is an inconsistent QB. The key to this game is stifling Missouri’s running attack. If we can get them in predictable passing situations, I like our chances. Our secondary has developed to become a formidable unit. And this week with Flowers coming back, this will be the 1st time in awhile that they are at full strength.
On offense we need to attack their secondary with the deep ball and then implement a running attack. This is a winnable game at home.