Michigan giving South Carolina our signs

#51
#51
B81 said:
Maybe Clemson figured it out and changed their signs!

Or maybe They didn’t have clemsons signs and just beat them. As I remember that Clemson team was not great. We smoked them in a bowl game.
Click to expand...
The same reports saying they had our signs also indicated they had Clemson’s as well.
 
#53
#53
LegionnaireOfTheMiserable said:
But the reports that we had our signs stolen also said Clemson did too
Click to expand...
I only heard of the guy that admitted to filming the TN/Ky game & claimed he was to do the same at Vandy.

Like was posted earlier, maybe Clemson got wise watching the Tenn/SC game & changed their signals. Sc was clearly not as effective on offense vs Clemson as they were vs Tennessee
 
#54
#54
wmcovol said:
I only heard of the guy that admitted to filming the TN/Ky game & claimed he was to do the same at Vandy.

Like was posted earlier, maybe Clemson got wise watching the Tenn/SC game & changed their signals. Sc was clearly not as effective on offense vs Clemson as they were vs Tennessee
Click to expand...
Do you really believe SC had our signals and that’s why we lost?
 
  • Like
Reactions: Dansky, GregoryHouse and Boca Vol
#57
#57
BigOrangeTrain said:
You cannot be serious
Click to expand...
We know for a fact that Michigan stole signs from many different schools. Ohio st, Michigan state, and TCU just to name a few. Stalions admitted on the documentary that he often shared info with other programs. We know that Stalions purchased tickets to two ut games. All of these are facts from the documentary/ ncaa investigation.

The question is, why do you think they didn’t relay those signs to a desperate South Carolina staff willing to do anything to not lose their jobs
 
#58
#58
Without a doubt signals were stolen and given to SC, the evidence is overwhelming. Michigan and SC both can shampoo my crotch hope they never win another game and the fact the NCAA let them continue on is shameful.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Ernie McCracken
#61
#61
scottvols69 said:
Without a doubt signals were stolen and given to SC, the evidence is overwhelming. Michigan and SC both can shampoo my crotch hope they never win another game and the fact the NCAA let them continue on is shameful.
Click to expand...
No it’s not without a doubt. You are just trying to come up with excuses and rationalize our terrible loss. We had locker room trouble. Our defense was bad in 2022. SC played the game of their lives. It happens. We got out coached and out played that game.
 
#62
#62
scottvols69 said:
Without a doubt signals were stolen and given to SC, the evidence is overwhelming. Michigan and SC both can shampoo my crotch hope they never win another game and the fact the NCAA let them continue on is shameful.
Click to expand...
Ewwwww...
 
#63
#63
Wasn't that when Jeremy Banks stepped on the T and wouldn't do push-ups. And the only game when SC defense wore wrist coaches?
 
#67
#67
BigOrangeTrain said:
There were major problems in our locker room prior to that game. Also it’s possible that SC just put it together for two games. That happens. If, and it’s a BIG if, they did have our signs, why didn’t Heupel and the staff adjust? You mean to tell me that our staff couldn’t make some tweaks to the plays when they noticed SC was dominating?

Our defense was bad in 2022. I think Vol fans need to accept that that SC game was a perfect storm of our locker room troubles and SC having a great game.
Click to expand...
No Way was this a perfect storm by SC wo Michigan helping them out. The Big Orange Train is smoking the wrong stuff.
 
#68
#68
BigOrangeTrain said:
No it’s not without a doubt. You are just trying to come up with excuses and rationalize our terrible loss. We had locker room trouble. Our defense was bad in 2022. SC played the game of their lives. It happens. We got out coached and out played that game.
Click to expand...
And you're tying to dismiss it as if it's impossible that them having our signs had any impact on that game. If stealing signs has no impact on the game, coaches wouldn't go to so much trouble to protect them and teams like Michigan wouldn't go to so much trouble to steal them.
 
  • Like
Reactions: marcusluvsvols, barrylee, TheDeeble and 6 others
#69
#69
Freak said:
And you're tying to dismiss it as if it's impossible that them having our signs had any impact on that game. If stealing signs has no impact on the game, coaches wouldn't go to so much trouble to protect them and teams like Michigan wouldn't go to so much trouble to steal them.
Click to expand...
So….was the problem UT not hiding their signs or having them stolen? Maybe I’m wrong, but if a team is open with their signs and you can crack the code, why not use that to your advantage?
 
#71
#71
Freak said:
And you're tying to dismiss it as if it's impossible that them having our signs had any impact on that game. If stealing signs has no impact on the game, coaches wouldn't go to so much trouble to protect them and teams like Michigan wouldn't go to so much trouble to steal them.
Click to expand...
Where is the undeniable proof that they had our signals? You do realize we had over 500 total yards in that game right? We had 31 first downs and was only down by 11 at halftime. Both teams only scored once in the third quarter. So what happened? Did SC just decide in the 3rd that they were just gonna not use our signals to completely run up the score? Come on.

Some fans just want to find an excuse as to why we got blown out. The simple explanation is we got out played and out coached.
 
#72
#72
BigOrangeTrain said:
Where is the undeniable proof that they had our signals? You do realize we had over 500 total yards in that game right? We had 31 first downs and was only down by 11 at halftime. Both teams only scored once in the third quarter. So what happened? Did SC just decide in the 3rd that they were just gonna not use our signals to completely run up the score? Come on.

Some fans just want to find an excuse as to why we got blown out. The simple explanation is we got out played and out coached.
Click to expand...

There is no proof. No evidence. It’s just like, wtf? How? 63 points? From a team that only averaged 20.7 points in the other SEC games? Come on. And then they come to Neyland the next year and get run out of the stadium. It just does not compute.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Freak
#73
#73
BigOrangeTrain said:
Where is the undeniable proof that they had our signals? You do realize we had over 500 total yards in that game right? We had 31 first downs and was only down by 11 at halftime. Both teams only scored once in the third quarter. So what happened? Did SC just decide in the 3rd that they were just gonna not use our signals to completely run up the score? Come on.

Some fans just want to find an excuse as to why we got blown out. The simple explanation is we got out played and out coached.
Click to expand...
I think they had our defensive signals, and maybe not our offensive signals. Or, even if they have the offensive signals, you still have to execute and stop the other team, whereas if you have the defensive signs, there are certain routes that work against zone or man coverage, and knowing the defensive coverage would make a mediocre qb a world beater.

As far as the third quarter, maybe we figured out that they had our signs and changed them.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Freak
#74
#74
BigOrangeTrain said:
Where is the undeniable proof that they had our signals? You do realize we had over 500 total yards in that game right? We had 31 first downs and was only down by 11 at halftime. Both teams only scored once in the third quarter. So what happened? Did SC just decide in the 3rd that they were just gonna not use our signals to completely run up the score? Come on.

Some fans just want to find an excuse as to why we got blown out. The simple explanation is we got out played and out coached.
Click to expand...

Where’s the undeniable proof they didn’t? Plenty of smoke to suggest it’s a possibility.
 
  • Like
Reactions: barrylee and Big Al Orange
New posts
You must log in or register to reply here.

VN Store



Back
Top