IfDickeyStayed
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- May 4, 2026
- Messages
- 80
- Likes
- 217
This offseason, Josh Heupel has consistently ranked near the bottom of every major college football coaching list I've seen. I know these rankings ultimately don't mean much, but I don't understand the reasoning behind them.
Examples:
Before anyone says "the media just hates Tennessee," that's not really the discussion I'm trying to have. While these rankings don't directly affect wins and losses, national perception does matter. It influences preseason narratives, recruiting, postseason conversations, and the overall prestige of a program.
I have made it known around here that I do have some issues with Heupel's program, like clock management, offseason personnel turnover, and loyalty to bad assistant coaches, but we are still the 14th-winningest program since Heupel took over in a hard conference, and his career winning percentage as a HC is (0.723). Also, few coaches took over worse situations than Heupel.
What are these reporters collectively seeing that TN fans, or just I, are missing?
Examples:
- CBS Sports: 19
- ON3: 19
- The Athletic: 17
- A to Z Sports: 22
- Josh Pate (SEC only): 9
- Crain & Cone (SEC only): 9
Before anyone says "the media just hates Tennessee," that's not really the discussion I'm trying to have. While these rankings don't directly affect wins and losses, national perception does matter. It influences preseason narratives, recruiting, postseason conversations, and the overall prestige of a program.
I have made it known around here that I do have some issues with Heupel's program, like clock management, offseason personnel turnover, and loyalty to bad assistant coaches, but we are still the 14th-winningest program since Heupel took over in a hard conference, and his career winning percentage as a HC is (0.723). Also, few coaches took over worse situations than Heupel.
What are these reporters collectively seeing that TN fans, or just I, are missing?
