I'd take Simms, at this point. He's more of a threat and Rick had a far better OL and running game going for him.
Simms, if he has time to make his reads and can relax while making his throws, will be more than a serviceable QB.
Neither one is great but who would you rather have. Rick pulled one hell of a over time win could matt do the same? Both have the same ball skills.
At this point in Simms career, I'd take Clausen. He was what Simms needs to be. Consistent, but good enough to win if he needs too.
Simms is playing behind the worst line in UT history and has improved week to week. He's not Manning but he's not nearly as bad as some of you make him out to be.
I am going to agree with sentence two, but I have to say "common man" to sentence one. The line is bad but there were times he had forever, for...eeee....ver, foooor...eeeeeeee...veeeeer to throw and still either 1) missed the receiver high or behind, or 2) got sacked.
I am going to agree with sentence two, but I have to say "common man" to sentence one. The line is bad but there were times he had forever, for...eeee....ver, foooor...eeeeeeee...veeeeer to throw and still either 1) missed the receiver high or behind, or 2) got sacked.
Need open receivers to throw it to, and I recall several drops in key situations that would have kept drives alive or scored TDs (Stocker's drop). Can't put it all on Simms, everyone contributed to the poor play. It takes seasoning to get to the point where you have all parts mesh together.