Let me know what you think?

#2
#2
i'm trying not to be too critical here, but was the shaky camera some sort of weird effect? If so, it's not needed. If not, I'd hire a new camera guy.
 
#3
#3
Love the touch of putting on the life vest when stealing the seadoo and being chased by murderous villains... :haha_oh:
 
#5
#5
volfanbill said:
i'm trying not to be too critical here, but was the shaky camera some sort of weird effect? If so, it's not needed. If not, I'd hire a new camera guy.
Click to expand...

Yeah, its called rack focusing. Its like they shoot on the show 24. It is supposed to be a little shaky to simulate more motion.
 
#6
#6
hmanvolfan said:
Love the touch of putting on the life vest when stealing the seadoo and being chased by murderous villains... :haha_oh:
Click to expand...

Ha ha. We shot that take 2 times before the TWRA came over and got pissed that I was on the jet ski without a life vest. Since the insurance policy didnt cover that in our filming permit, we had to have a life vest on me. I know. SUCKS.
 
#8
#8
I thought it was pretty good, liked the fight scenes. One movie pet peeve of mine, though, is when the hero is outnumbered by villians with guns yet manages to fight his way out of it. The man would have shot you as soon as you took out the bikini triplets.
 
#9
#9
The Dude said:
I thought it was pretty good, liked the fight scenes. One movie pet peeve of mine, though, is when the hero is outnumbered by villians with guns yet manages to fight his way out of it. The man would have shot you as soon as you took out the bikini triplets.
Click to expand...

True. But Jason Bourne would have been shot in the first 10 minutes too. I guess its what makes it a movie. ha ha. Thanks for the feedback.
 
#10
#10
Dawson said:
Yeah, its called rack focusing. Its like they shoot on the show 24. It is supposed to be a little shaky to simulate more motion.
Click to expand...

That was not rack focusing by any stretch of the imagination. It was a camera guy who kept bouncing around. The camera moves, but it doesn't constantly bobble up and down like that in rack focusing.
Posted via VolNation Mobile
 
#11
#11
Well, Im not a camera man or cinematographer. All I know is, the director has won more than 20 awards for music videos, short films, and documentaries. The camera guy is pretty accomplished too.
 
#12
#12
I thought it was good Dawson. Funny in alot of parts. I assumed funny was what you were going after. If it was action you failed. If it was parody you win.
 
#15
#15
It was supposed to be a spoof of sorts of action films with a little twist in the end. This was mostly a first attempt at action sequences with using camera techniques. The quick cutting in and out is typical of Jerry Bruckheimer films and also utilized in music videos. Thank for the feed back.
 
#16
#16
volger said:
I thought it was good Dawson. Funny in alot of parts. I assumed funny was what you were going after. If it was action you failed. If it was parody you win.
Click to expand...

Well, it was supposed to be a parody, spoof, funny at the end, and action too. Again, we had the guys at Lavorshia Films and Harpeth Productions add their expertise as well. The only people that had done any real acting before was myself and JD Hart (main bad guy). The rest of them were friends that were standing in as henchmen. We used ZERO money on this so when we get the funding for a feature, we will do something based upon an action film. The current feature film is a horror movie. Filming will start this summer.
 
New Posts
You must log in or register to reply here.

Advertisement



Back
Top