I will admit that I was downing the Gruden Kool-Aid a little over a month ago, but I have definately joined the CLK bandwagon. The only issue that bothered me with CLK was his lack of experience. But, since the naming of Monte and Orgeron I have been as big a CLK fan and supporter as one can be....
So it must have bothered you even worse when UT hired Dickey,Battle and Fulmer, because LK's resume is better than all of those at the time they were hired by UT
I don't necessarily understand the reason to try to make me see that CLK had more experience than they did. Did I not say in my post that I am a complete CLK backer?
If I had said, "Screw Lane.....Fulmer is a god"....then I might understand it. But, as a loyal, life-long fan of the Vols, I just wouldn't want to try to start crap with another fan. Seems to me like two fans of the same team would be on the same side? Course, I am not all that intelligent; I got my education on The Hill.....
Believe it or not, there are those who post here who resort to calling you a Fulmerite or Negavol when you don't believe the same thing they do. The ignore user and ignore thread buttons work wonders.