Kiffin recruiting Tennessee talent

#101
#101
AbsenteeTrojan said:
USC traveled to Oregon with 43 scholarship players. It's a fact.


I'm not sure what you're arguing about. You said that they had three years in the program. They didn't have three years in the program - they had two.


Where did I argue this? Hint - I didn't.


But your argument wasn't "3 summers in the program"... your argument was "3 years in the program". Do you not see the difference?

By the way, you can't count Isaih Wiley as a player who had ANY time in the program. He was a JUCO transfer that arrived late in the fall.


Really? The conference was "extremely weak"?

A conference with 3 teams in the top-7 in the final rankings is "extremely weak"? Good to know.
Click to expand...

Couple of things. Yelling something is a 'fact' doesn't make it automatically a credible sourse. Links do that, like the one that showed USC had 67 scholarship players. So kill ot with Sparta analogy of taking on the Persian Ducks.

2ndly, Don't really answer this, it's a rhetorical question, but how did the other 9 Pac 12 teams do?

College Football - Pacific-12 Conference Standings
 
#102
#102
jasonvol18 said:
There was alao huge drop off from Ala, LSU and maybe Ark last year. Oregon runs a great system and has a great coach like Boise so they dont necessarily need top 10 classes to compete.Kiffin is an elite recruiter and a really good play caller.
Click to expand...

Yeah from great teams, to solid teams, to mid level teams.
The Pac 12 nosedives after you get past the top 3.
 
#103
#103
sanddune50 said:
Couple of things. Yelling something is a 'fact' doesn't make it automatically a credible sourse. Links do that, like the one that showed USC had 67 scholarship players. So kill ot with Sparta analogy of taking on the Persian Ducks.
Click to expand...
Think about it for a second. 67 scholarship players total. Minus all of the redshirts (the poster quoted... 16?). Down to 51 available players. Then take out injuries, etc.

I'm not doing the research for you. It is well documented that USC traveled to Oregon with 43 scholarship players.
 
#104
#104
AbsenteeTrojan said:
Think about it for a second. 67 scholarship players total. Minus all of the redshirts (the poster quoted... 16?). Down to 51 available players. Then take out injuries, etc.

I'm not doing the research for you. It is well documented that USC traveled to Oregon with 43 scholarship players.
Click to expand...

redshirts are still available players
 
#108
#108
utvolpj said:
then the coach made a choice as to how many players he used so depth is a weak excuse. They were absolutely "available" options to the head coach
Click to expand...
Really? Because a bunch of true freshman will be the difference maker when it comes to "depth"?

If true freshman (who should be redshirting) end up playing, USC would be screwed anyway.

And who's using depth as an excuse? We won the game. The fact is that we took 43 scholarship players to top-10 Oregon and gave Chip Kelly his first loss at Autzen.
 
#109
#109
VolGraduate said:
So someone told you there are/were USC posters in our complex and you believed them???
Click to expand...

He did show USC film to recruits to demonstrate the offense he planned to use, but I seriously doubt he "installed" any USC posters anywhere. Pretty ridiculous if you ask me.
 
New posts
You must log in or register to reply here.
Advertisement



Back
Top